P23-03 remains submitted49445d4, same immutable7 conditions/6 categories/30packages88units. Your previous actual OPUS_R13_VISUAL_ORDER_DIRECTION allowed auxiliary read-only actual Opus image judgments before one fresh full177, compact tuples [row_index, category_bool,state_bool,position_bool] with exact typed lossless mapping and no inferred values. Normal all-condition review remains after full177.
Actual new evidence: Complete R13 proof copied read-only and byte-verified into a frozen49445d4 review cwd .review-material,11242files,76 unique manifest SHAs/1780 eligible rows; all original images/manifests/crops/source accessible, no material cap. Actual Runner.llm reviewer claude-opus-5-5 single bulk pass terminated124 at registered900 seconds. stdout0/stderr0, no structured judgment and no acceptance credit. It is terminal; child PID gone. Do not rerun same bulk request, repair product, recollect native or relax required judgments.
Please design a concrete minimal Root continuation for collecting ALL76/1780 exact independent judgments as smaller serial managed reviewer calls over THE SAME existing frozen checkout/material, using the existing Runner.llm reviewer lifecycle and original900 timeout. Proposal: partition frames in deterministic original order into about8-12frames/call, each schema requires its exact manifestSHA+all original eligible row indices and explicit3bool tuples, preserve each successful actual provider raw output/session/modelSHA immediately, then aggregate only disjoint exact cover and existing typed round-trip extraction. Each call retains access to complete original materials and source; partition output assignment is NOT a file/byte access cap. Do not clone/copy complete proof again, parallelize reviewers, infer omitted row decisions, or repeat successful batches. If900 still insufficient, subdivide only terminal failed batch with no judgments; preserve failed receipts. Actual false judgments retained; investigate before full. Is this compliant, choose sensible frame/row workload and exact safeguards/repair scope if needed. Does global visual-only evidence production require an additional cross-frame synthesis or can all-condition review after full provide that? Answer valid action wait and actionable reasoning; do not dispatch or claim acceptance. Select Sol unless actual implementation needs Astra.
Resource recovery: all cold Drive verified, third closed test profile content-preserving compression restored measured4.54GB. Fresh full177 reserve computed3.82GB including prior full176 profiles1,941,279,622B+output179,357,034B+167,772,160B source allowance,20percent margin+OS1GiB. Full-r01 had58PASS0failed119unexecuted; no splice. Candidate and original native proof untouched. We continue permitted independent work; no owner question needed for technical batching within unchanged acceptance/model/timeout/services.
