Actual Opus: continue SAME registered P18-01-CODE. Worker repair3 terminal, realPID68482 gone, only IMPLEMENTATION.md policy note changed, no product/test edits. Preserved0084760e same worktree, never reset. Root ordinary repair4 applied, state repair_ready, used4 capnull. Return action=run with concrete full direction and model choice, preserving immutable4backendconditions/12paths and originalP18-01 conditions. Model defaultSol; chooseAstra only justified.

Prior worker stopped all repairs because baseline int() also accepts numericstrings and from_snapshot defaults corrupt containers; unchanged spec says wrongtypesreject and legacyvalidpreserved. User explicitly says do not invent unknowns and CONTINUE independent work. Your prior instruction said record genuine conflicts; it did NOT require stopping independent fixes. Correct this in concrete instructions. No new gameplay/value decision exists here.

First inspect actual legitimate PRODUCER snapshots (RelationshipState.get_snapshot and serviceget_snapshot), saved-v1 representative fixtures and actual Reader. Determine whether numeric-string/coerced-garbage containers were ever LEGITIMATE produced save formats, rather than equating every permissive decoder fallback with supported valid format. Derive compatibility vs corrupt rejection from unchanged contract and producer evidence. If this resolves apparent conflict, explicitly state engineering interpretation and evidence without changing spec/values. If a real contradiction remains, retain that precise gap but still implement ALL independent repairs below; do not terminate entire task before them and do not silently select a new input policy. No new human question until a concrete reviewable proposal exists.

Required independent fixes unchanged: remove new unjustified legacy activeactor loop (keep original-specific identities), candidate restored_catalog notlivecatalog, actual alias-bearing affection/dependence mutations throughService/Runtime/save+rebind preserving rawaliases/unknown/order, canonicalprecedence, unconfiguredoriginal, UNIQUEremove/retire actualguards and saved original survivingrefusal, originalduplicate/wrongversiontype/projection/nonheroineUNIQUE/rivalnotcounterpart/nonstaff atomicnegativechecks. Legitimate finite JSONnumeric legacy cases can be handled/tested independently of numericstring policy. Inputbytes and prior state must notmutateonfailure. Existing5suitesunchanged.

One additional concrete ACCEPTANCE dependency observed by Root before expensive testing: tools/run_p18_relationship_tests.py currently hardcodes len(parse_paths)==308, but tracked GD sources have grown on latestmain (415 versus old390; effective active sourcecount must actually derivefromshared.source_refs, nottrackedcount). Same contract requires all active scripts parsed, strict full-source evidence, real latest-main integration/final. This stale count will reject otherwise correct merged-source validation. Fix only as needed: derive and strictly bind parse list to exact actual source map, parse EVERY selectedGD, preserve strict per-script receipts/roster/marker/source/profile validation, no count-based omissions or skips. New changes must continue to verify frozen308 whereactual308 and actual expandedmergedsourcewhereexpanded; do not weaken to anycount/ignorefiles. Review actual verify() path too; only collection/preflight count may not be enough. Keep exactsource/settings/input/receipt matching. No Runnercore/stateDB/policy edits or custompostmergehook. This helper is an existing allowedpath.

Root will run frozen-source native7, formalvalidate, separateOpusreview; before normalprepareintegration the merged actualsource needs fresh or fully applicable native evidence under strict verifier (whole source mustmatch, never relabel old843). Plan related changes now, don't knowinglysubmit a stale308 helper then make another repair. Worker STATIC/PREPARE-ONLY only, noengine/defaultprofile/nativecollector/full. Oldwholeoutput474MB includes351MBengine; fresh2native sets+newcheckouts require explicitdiskpreflight, current3.39GB. No duplicate implementation/native/full.

Make a concrete submission after independent work, accurately recording any remaining genuine input ambiguity. Keep existing IMPLEMENTATION.md failurehistoricalnote, not as currentblockedstatementsafterfix. Preservealloriginalconditions. Do not claimbackend/wholeunitcomplete. Full prior actual direction and actual worker failure and resource facts follow:
{"action": "run", "task_id": "P18-01-CODE", "reason": "Run the ordinary repair for P18-01-CODE in the same preserved clean worktree on 0084760e. Do not create a new task, re-register it or start a duplicate worker. The repair counter stays at 3 and the cap stays null. The spec, all 4 backend conditions, the 12 allowed paths and the original P18-01 remaining_unit_conditions are unchanged.\n\nThe worker only does static checks and --prepare-only. It returns a submission and does not commit, push or touch main. No engine runs until Root's preflight.\n\nProblems in the held source:\n(a) relationship_service.gd:544-579 `_legacy_types_valid` demands strict `int` for the shield, timestamp and day fields, the metrics (including the `affinity`/`obligation` aliases), action_counts, daily_metric_deltas and thresholds, and a String `route_id`. The baseline RelationshipState (relationship_state.gd:57-239) instead coerces these with `int()`/`clampi()`. So legitimate older saves that came through JSON or the baseline Reader, for example whole numbers stored as floats, are now rejected.\n(b) simulation_runtime.gd:1063-1066 adds an actor-existence loop that the baseline did not have. It rejects relationships of departed guests, whose records `GuestService.despawn_guest` keeps in `persistent_records`.\n(c) simulation_runtime.gd:6773-6788 `_original_relationship_identities_valid` validates against the live `mvp_content_catalog` even during the candidate restore at :1059. It should use `restored_catalog` (:712).\n(d) No test changes an alias-bearing record through `_merge_legacy_changes` (:440-452).\n\nRepair steps:\n\n1. Recheck the baseline first. At d2a1f80, read `RelationshipState.from_snapshot`/`_value`, `RelationshipService.restore_snapshot`/`_parse_snapshot`, Runtime full restore, `GuestService` `persistent_records`/`despawn_guest`, the numeric Reader, and the P02-01 representative saves. From those, derive exactly which legacy numeric and field formats the baseline legitimately accepted and which it rejected. Finite integral JSON floats are only an example. Do not invent a new format restriction or a new loosening.\n   - Relax `_legacy_types_valid` only back to the baseline's legitimate acceptance.\n   - Keep the raw legacy values byte-preserved. Keep the existing canonical-over-alias precedence.\n   - Keep rejecting: non-numeric and non-finite values, wrong container types, unknown or future versions, duplicate ids or pairs, bad candidate references, corrupt original payloads, and projection mismatches.\n   - If the baseline accepted something that the spec's \"wrong types reject\" clause would forbid (for example the coercion of numeric strings by `int()`), do not silently pick a side. Record it as an explicit gap in the submission.\n\n2. Delete the new actor loop at :1063-1066, or narrow it to exactly what the baseline enforced, including departed guests in `persistent_records`. Keep the person-reference validation for original records.\n\n3. Pass the catalog into `_original_relationship_identities_valid`: `restored_catalog` during candidate restore, the live catalog for commands.\n\n4. Lifecycle: use the existing guards and do not invent a departure policy.\n   - Test that `remove_staff`/`retire_staff` on a UNIQUE heroine with a registered original record is refused.\n   - Test that the record survives save and readback after the refusal.\n   - Never silently delete original records.\n\n5. Tests, in tests/s4/test_original_relationship_model.gd and tests/s4/test_original_relationship_runtime.gd:\n   - Load a v1 record with `affinity`/`obligation` plus unknown fields, then actually change `affection` and `dependence` through the existing public APIs.\n   - Save as v2, restore and rebind. Assert the changed canonical values, the untouched raw aliases, the unknown fields, the collection order and canonical precedence.\n   - Assert the original Affection/Lust/Netorare values stay unconfigured (null) and are never filled from old axes.\n   - Accepted-legacy tests: a JSON-float v1 save, a departed-guest relationship, and the applicable P02-01 representative save.\n   - Atomic rejection tests, each showing the prior service and Runtime state and the input bytes unchanged: duplicate original, wrong version type, projection mismatch, non-heroine UNIQUE subject, rival not a counterpart, and a subject who is not staff.\n\n6. Pins: update the 2 new rows in completion_marker_contracts.json and the 2 new rows in suite-policy.json to the exact new source SHA-256 values. Leave the 5 existing suites byte-identical. Do not weaken any existing test.\n\n7. Run static and `--prepare-only` checks only, and report bytes, capacity (about 3.1 GB free) and roster. No raw Godot, no default profile, no native collector, no duplicate full regression.\n\n8. Update IMPLEMENTATION.md under p18-01-code/ with each accepted legacy format: why it is accepted and what is still rejected.\n\n9. Stay out of UI, production values and coefficients, routes, contacts and duel. Make no completion claim: P18-01 stays 30/88, in progress, with no partial credit.\n\nAfter the repair, the order is:\n1. Root runs the native local + affected collection (7 suites, strict provenance) on the exact candidate.\n2. p18-model validation.\n3. Separate Opus review.\n4. Latest-main integration.\n5. Affected final validation.", "codex_model": "gpt-6.1-sol", "codex_model_reason": "The changes are narrow and already located: relax one validator back to the baseline's `int()`-coercion acceptance (I checked relationship_state.gd:57-239), remove or narrow one 4-line loop, add a catalog parameter, then add tests and update hash pins. The atomic restored_* candidate restore already exists, so no new design work is needed and Astra's extra cost and time aren't justified. Sol is enough as long as it reads the baseline Reader and GuestService before relaxing anything. Choosing the model doesn't authorize a cap change or an acceptance waiver."}
ACTUAL FAILURE
{"task_id": "P18-01-CODE", "commit": "d2a1f80a613e7c77b02b941026bc49c2d85db863", "status": "blocked", "summary": "基準実装の数値文字列変換・不正コンテナの既定値化と、固定仕様のwrong types拒否が衝突しています。判断を補完せずIMPLEMENTATION.mdに記録し、コードは未変更です。prepare-only成功：67,310,742 bytes、空き3,384,279,040 bytes、7 suites、engine実行0。git diff --check成功。P18-01は30/88・進行中を維持します。", "acceptance_ids": ["P18-C-1", "P18-C-2", "P18-C-3", "P18-C-4"], "findings": [{"severity": "high", "message": "数値文字列など、基準実装では受理するが固定仕様では型不正となる形式の扱いについて明示的な方針決定が必要です。"}, {"severity": "medium", "message": "要求されたコード修正・追加テスト・SHA更新は未実施。P02-01代表セーブの適用確認と正式native検証も未完了です。"}]}
RESOURCE
{"previous_candidate": "0084760e", "old_profile_archive_bytes": 0, "old_entire_output_logical_bytes": 474130889, "old_engine_bytes": 351312912, "old_source_bytes": 67310742, "tracked_gd_counts": {"/Users/korizatou114/Projects/とりにく工房ゲーム制作部": 415, "/Users/korizatou114/Projects/TheTree-managed-worktrees/p18-01-model/P18-01-CODE-implement": 390}, "current_free_bytes": 3395706880, "integration_risk": "Held collector enforces308, actual newer main has moreGD. Preserve all-script parsing and exact source map; avoid stale fixed count in normal merged integration. Check source tree applicability before any native rerun."}