docs: pin full P19 reachability review pass before normal integration

docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p19-03/ROOT_CURRENT_ACCEPTANCE_STATUS.json

@@ -1,30 +1,29 @@
 {
-  "at_jst": "2026-10-17T19:50:02.321271+09:00",
+  "at_jst": "2026-10-17T19:58:24.516684+09:00",
   "plan_id": "P19-03",
   "registered_task": "P19-03-TABLE",
   "project": "the-tree-p19-03-reachability",
-  "S": "e0420d57a381a1644357f0590536e1d47c9bca9f",
+  "S": "806de25068bc423136063791afcea811d251ee1b",
   "implementation_model": "gpt-6.1-sol",
   "actual_model_decision": "c767de1cd89d40e5a23964f2e62ce4c6",
-  "state": "repair1_in_progress_after_whole_review",
+  "state": "whole_original_review_passed_integration_final_pending",
   "original_acceptance": "7名×3ルートの到達表があり、未制作内容は欠損として残る。",
   "original_units": 88,
   "formally_completed": 14,
   "new_credit": 0,
   "registered_validation": {
     "passed": true,
-    "artifact": "ROOT_FORMAL_VALIDATION_E0420D5.json",
+    "artifact": "ROOT_FORMAL_VALIDATION_806DE25.json",
     "checks": [
       "p19-table",
       "p19-negative",
       "p19-source-binding"
     ],
-    "self_tests": 10
+    "self_tests": 12
   },
   "actual_reviewer": {
-    "id": "d4e70e7f48f549b085692962f88531a8",
-    "status": "finished_changes_requested",
-    "artifact": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p19-03-reachability/runs/d4e70e7f48f549b085692962f88531a8"
+    "id": "38eaaacdb31b4c76bcf982987816a391",
+    "status": "finished_pass"
   },
   "reviewer_model": "claude-opus-5-5",
   "full_game_input_equality": {
@@ -32,12 +31,11 @@
     "markers_policy_engine_roster_parse_default_player_same": true,
     "full184_21903_329parse_186ended_reuse_qualified": true,
     "new_native_runs": 0,
-    "artifact": "ROOT_EXACT_GAME_INPUT_REUSE_E0420D5.json"
+    "artifact": "ROOT_EXACT_GAME_INPUT_REUSE_806DE25.json"
   },
   "required_before_acceptance": [
-    "Complete same-source scoped repair and registered3checks on its actual submittedSHA",
-    "Separate actual whole-original Opus re-review of corrected21cells+allfindings",
-    "Normal actual integrationC/M, exactequality andfinal, thenledger/push"
+    "Normal actual integrationC/M and independent candidate source/input equality",
+    "Normal final and existing exact real-owner main authorization, thenledger/push; no new humanSHA speech fabricated"
   ],
   "source_gaps_preserved": [
     "Six missing productioncatalog IDs are not fabricated; table audit uses existing original atomic entity keys",
@@ -52,18 +50,15 @@
   "repairs": 1,
   "repair_cap": null,
   "whole_original_review": {
-    "run_id": "d4e70e7f48f549b085692962f88531a8",
-    "status": "changes_requested",
-    "medium": 1,
+    "run_id": "38eaaacdb31b4c76bcf982987816a391",
+    "status": "pass",
+    "critical_high_medium": 0,
     "low": 3,
-    "artifact": "ROOT_WHOLE_REVIEW_E0420D5.json"
+    "artifact": "ROOT_WHOLE_REVIEW_806DE25.json"
   },
   "actual_repair_worker": {
     "id": "bf8a86e053044bfea0051253fefb2ec7",
-    "role": "implementer",
-    "status": "finished",
-    "pid": 33968,
-    "artifact": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p19-03-reachability/runs/bf8a86e053044bfea0051253fefb2ec7"
+    "status": "finished"
   },
   "repair_scope": "Same5Docfiles: legacy presence vsoriginalconformance for4clauses, independent source-presence/evidence-loss tests, route-ending interruption crossrefs, precise hash labels. No game/values/pins/roster changes."
 }

docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p19-03/ROOT_DEFERRED_LOW_NOTES_806DE25.json

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+{
+  "actual_review": "38eaaacdb31b4c76bcf982987816a391",
+  "findings": [
+    {
+      "severity": "low",
+      "message": "Most data-level negative tests still compare the document against the same expected() canonical. The independent semantic checks name only three markers: restore_shield, shield_broken and EXCLUSIVE_LOCKED. Citations such as the preview service's contact/shield-candidate lines, and the 6850, 1039 and 1047 call sites, are checked only for text and blob equality, not for a function-name marker. Consider asserting a marker for every legacy entry."
+    },
+    {
+      "severity": "low",
+      "message": "The run log in IMPLEMENTATION_REPORT.md reports source binding actual_commit=e0420d5. That comes from the pre-commit local run. The Runner output correctly binds 806de25, but the report should mark that line as the pre-submission local value."
+    },
+    {
+      "severity": "low",
+      "message": "The snapshot_container evidence range (relationship_service.gd 423–479) starts mid-function and cuts off inside restore_snapshot. It is accurate as evidence, but a range aligned to function boundaries would be clearer for downstream owners (P18-01, P19-02)."
+    }
+  ],
+  "disposition": "Low severity optional hardening/clarity notes, not original audit blockers. Formal Runner output pins806de25; worker report e0420d5 is a pre-submission local-run HEAD, not the final accepted version."
+}

docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p19-03/ROOT_EXACT_GAME_INPUT_REUSE_806DE25.json

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+{
+  "artifact_S": "806de25068bc423136063791afcea811d251ee1b",
+  "existing_product_C": "65f07bf5eaa759a8e2e17c7bdbbbdbceb24ee373",
+  "old_actual_native_S": "a7e3069b167511b3194242b3403fbcc35244a526",
+  "all1368_selected_source_settings_assets_tests_tools_byte_equal": true,
+  "marker_policy_engine_roster_parse_default_player_equal": true,
+  "scope": "All source_refs keys exactly equal; no file set was narrowed or omitted. New doc-only audit helpers are outside this unchanged pre-existing selection algorithm.",
+  "native_full_evidence_reuse_qualified": true,
+  "new_native_runs": 0,
+  "existing_full": {
+    "actual_suites": 184,
+    "missing_marker_paths": [],
+    "remaining_unexecuted_tests": [],
+    "available_marker_checks": 21903,
+    "actual_all_roster_checks": 21903,
+    "strict_accepted_checks": 21903,
+    "verified": true,
+    "composed": true,
+    "original_full_attempt_passed": false,
+    "whole_original_acceptance": false,
+    "parse_checks": 329,
+    "setup_phases": 2,
+    "owned_ended": 186,
+    "tested_source": "a7e3069b167511b3194242b3403fbcc35244a526",
+    "engines_started": 0,
+    "verifier_sha256": "d00bf46bfcc0e0bb197edd284a3ae14610ca710507831e18e071a79461946e8a"
+  },
+  "previous_actual_whole_backend_Opus_review": "ead8e74b9683404d8cf3d97bca118726",
+  "P19_whole_original_acceptance": "pending actual independent semantic review of full original §6–7, all21cells and all source/status/owner/gap claims, then normalintegration/final",
+  "time_ns": 1792234414270856000
+}

docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p19-03/ROOT_FORMAL_VALIDATION_806DE25.json

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+{
+  "task_id": "P19-03-TABLE",
+  "commit": "806de25068bc423136063791afcea811d251ee1b",
+  "kind": "validation",
+  "checks": [
+    {
+      "id": "p19-table",
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "artifact": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p19-03-reachability/runs/8d14038fd19c4277a2ab9d430bf2dbd0",
+      "passed": true
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "p19-negative",
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "artifact": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p19-03-reachability/runs/ad32d058245d45c6a0554ca92e0f46dd",
+      "passed": true
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "p19-source-binding",
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "artifact": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p19-03-reachability/runs/fec4a9beda95427d89b4050e07a771e9",
+      "passed": true
+    }
+  ],
+  "passed": true
+}

docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p19-03/ROOT_WHOLE_REVIEW_806DE25.json

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+{
+  "task_id": "P19-03-TABLE",
+  "commit": "806de25068bc423136063791afcea811d251ee1b",
+  "status": "pass",
+  "summary": "I re-reviewed the whole P19-03 unit at 806de25, read-only. I checked it against BASELINE §6 (lines 114–135) and §7 (lines 136–161), the work_packages P19-03 record, the 61 B-7.x atomic records snapshotted in the JSON, the immutable TASK_SPEC, and the frozen game source. I did not edit or run anything.\n\n**Original acceptance (「7名×3ルートの到達表があり、未制作内容は欠損として残る。」)**\n- The acceptance text is identical to work_packages.json:16100.\n- The table has 21 cells: the seven original names × 純愛/NTR/堕落.\n  - The names アンリ/フィーネ/トマリ/アメリア/リズ/ミミ/サツキ match BASELINE lines 118–124.\n  - The IDs are the existing atomic keys AR.heroine.<key>.route.{love,ntr,corruption}.\n  - No character or route was invented or substituted.\n- The catalog has only heroine_anri, and original_relationship_state.gd has no roster. So using the atomic keys, and leaving the six missing catalog IDs as explicit gaps, is honest and invents no IDs.\n- Each cell has all 8 categories. Common rules are kept separate from character-specific content.\n- Every character-specific item is recorded as 欠損 / 原本未定義 / D08 pending. Each carries a reason, an owner from the real work_packages deliverables (P18-02, P19-01, P19-02, P20-02, P26-01, P26-02), the citations [138–161] plus the character's own line, and natural_route_complete=false.\n- D05, D08, thresholds, rates and initial values all stay pending, with no invented numbers. The original's undefined per-character content therefore stays as gaps, which is what this audit acceptance allows. It is not game acceptance.\n\n**Previous findings from the e0420d5 review**\n1. MEDIUM, missing legacy evidence: fixed.\n   - coassignment_attack, zero_break, love_actions, threshold_route_loss and legacy_event_ui now carry legacy_evidence: path, anchor 1b07b87, git blob OID, file SHA-256, line range and quoted text.\n   - I checked every range against the real source:\n     - relationship_service.gd: restore_shield 246–261, apply_shield_attack 264–312 (includes shield_broken), request_route_lock 315–340, confirm_route_lock 343–355.\n     - simulation_runtime.gd: command registration 342–343 and the apply_shield_attack call at 6850.\n     - event_service.gd: lines 1039 and 1047.\n     - placement_risk_preview_service.gd: _contact_summary 536–565 and _shield_attack_candidates 619–640.\n     - main.gd: 98–101 is EVENT_CHOICE_NAMES. The correction from 89–101 is right, because 89–97 are unrelated excavation labels.\n   - These clauses all use the same rule: original status missing, classified legacy_not_original, with the P18-01 reason. The main.gd label constant is no longer credited as partial.\n2. LOW, independent tests: addressed.\n   - validate_legacy reads the anchored blobs via git show / rev-parse and is enforced by --check.\n   - The self-tests compute the blob OID independently with git hash-object, assert function and text markers, and reject evidence that is dropped, emptied, marked \"not implemented\", or has a stale OID or text, for every legacy clause.\n3. LOW, interruption cross-references: addressed. All 21 cells' interruption_cancellation entries now cite lines 148 and 153 (exact text plus baseline hash) and the legacy confirm_route_lock as legacy_not_original.\n4. LOW, hash labels: addressed in the checker constants, the checker output and the report.\n\n**Scope:** the diff touches only the 5 allowed files under execution/p19-03/. TASK_SPEC, the frozen pins, the selection record, the original registers and the game files are unchanged.\n\n**Validation:** all 3 registered checks ran on 806de25 and exited 0.\n- p19-table: --check output binds actual_commit 806de25, 1368 selected files, file_equality true.\n- p19-negative: 12 tests OK.\n- p19-source-binding: passed.\n\nThe earlier failed invocations were unexpanded `{worktree}` placeholders that never opened a script; no failure was turned into a pass.\n\nOnly low-severity notes remain, and they do not block the audit acceptance. Integration/final and the other gates are still required before the count moves from 14 to 15; I give no credit before those.",
+  "acceptance_ids": [
+    "P19-03"
+  ],
+  "findings": [
+    {
+      "severity": "low",
+      "message": "Most data-level negative tests still compare the document against the same expected() canonical. The independent semantic checks name only three markers: restore_shield, shield_broken and EXCLUSIVE_LOCKED. Citations such as the preview service's contact/shield-candidate lines, and the 6850, 1039 and 1047 call sites, are checked only for text and blob equality, not for a function-name marker. Consider asserting a marker for every legacy entry."
+    },
+    {
+      "severity": "low",
+      "message": "The run log in IMPLEMENTATION_REPORT.md reports source binding actual_commit=e0420d5. That comes from the pre-commit local run. The Runner output correctly binds 806de25, but the report should mark that line as the pre-submission local value."
+    },
+    {
+      "severity": "low",
+      "message": "The snapshot_container evidence range (relationship_service.gd 423–479) starts mid-function and cuts off inside restore_snapshot. It is accurate as evidence, but a range aligned to function boundaries would be clearer for downstream owners (P18-01, P19-02)."
+    }
+  ]
+}