docs: correct original NTR onset and audit relationship prerequisites

2026-10-13 13:47:57 +09:00
parent 88b9fe030b
commit 70e76cd073
7 changed files with 188 additions and 9 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# P24-02 closure prerequisites
+
+Candidate 666c87bd remains submitted and unaccepted. Root corrected an earlier misreading: original BASELINE line143 explicitly says shield durability zero/break starts NTR erosion. The existing shield_changed -> RELATIONSHIP_SHIELD_CHANGED(old_value/new_value) -> subscribed Main cut-in path can represent this boundary. The candidate wording “love shield lost” must be restored to original NTR-start meaning; proposed-original-ntr-warning.patch is not adopted. This correction does not invent a new gameplay value.
+
+Ordinary automatic rival co-placement attack is not yet proven. Existing confirmed call site is the attack_relationship_shield command executor. P18-01/02 own original relationship model/save and contact/boundary contracts. Current generic five metrics remain different from original Affection/Lust/Netorare; retain legacy facts and do not infer a migration.
+
+P19-01 owns all three duel types and original win/loss shield/actor/ledger effects. Candidate production scripts/autoload show no duel generator, executor or saved duel state; CUTIN_DUEL is only a presentation definition. Do not add fictional events and call it ordinary gameplay acceptance. P21-01 owns ordinary defense/threat generation; DEFENSE_RAID_CREATED service callback exists but ordinary-trigger proof is still required.
+
+Opus commander selected default Codex6.1Sol for the small P24 display/menu repair and recommended verifying upstream acceptance, P01-01 scope/catalog gaps, then P18-01/02, P19-01/P21-01 before final P24 actual-warning acceptance. No additional worker, repair, source adoption, or cap change was launched by this audit. User authorization for extra P24 repair is still pending. All30/88 and no partial credit remain.
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+{
+  "formal_acceptance": false,
+  "candidate": "666c87bd7d7c961ae6d7d2ad8d52d6456c31015b",
+  "baseline_sha256": "75e4bdbdeb379c9269553f0c776bdb9cc96e01f2d6aa5ca650d132c63a8aeb1a",
+  "source_original_conditions": [
+    {
+      "line": 140,
+      "text": " * **好感度 (Affection):** 主人公への愛。「愛の盾」の最大耐久値。"
+    },
+    {
+      "line": 141,
+      "text": " * **淫乱度 (Lust):** 快楽への依存。盾の防御力（ダメージ軽減率）を下げる。"
+    },
+    {
+      "line": 142,
+      "text": " * **NTR度 (Netorare):** ライバル依存。盾破壊後に上昇する。"
+    },
+    {
+      "line": 143,
+      "text": " * **『愛の盾』:** NTR攻撃を無効化するバリア。耐久値0でブレイクし、NTR侵食が始まる。"
+    },
+    {
+      "line": 145,
+      "text": " 1. **盾への攻撃:** ライバルと同配置時、盾耐久値が減少。"
+    },
+    {
+      "line": 146,
+      "text": " 2. **ブレイク:** 耐久値0で「心の隙間」発生。"
+    },
+    {
+      "line": 147,
+      "text": " 3. **NTR進行:** ライバル接触で直接NTR度が上昇。"
+    },
+    {
+      "line": 149,
+      "text": "## 7.4 決闘システム (Duel System)"
+    },
+    {
+      "line": 151,
+      "text": " * **種類:** 武力決闘、商談決闘、夜の決闘（性技対決）。"
+    },
+    {
+      "line": 152,
+      "text": " * **リターン:** ライバル追放・隷属化、「愛の盾」全回復。"
+    },
+    {
+      "line": 153,
+      "text": " * **リスク:** 敗北時、ヒロインを即座に強奪されNTRルート確定。"
+    },
+    {
+      "line": 226,
+      "text": " * **カットイン:** 「NTR侵食開始」などの重要警告、決闘発生、防衛戦開始演出。"
+    }
+  ],
+  "correction": "Earlier Root instruction separated shield break from NTR onset without checking explicit original line143. That instruction was wrong. Positive-old to zero shield transition is original-defined NTR onset; candidate wording needs correction. No candidate source has been edited.",
+  "existing_NTR_event_path": {
+    "service": "scripts/relationship/relationship_service.gd apply_shield_attack old>0,new0 shield_changed",
+    "runtime": "autoload/simulation_runtime.gd _on_relationship_shield_changed publishes RELATIONSHIP_SHIELD_CHANGED with old_value/new_value",
+    "candidate_UI": "scenes/main/main.gd subscribes wildcard and handles the same transition, currently says love shield lost",
+    "ordinary_same_placement_generation": "not proven; only command execution call site confirmed, no natural rival-placement attack accepted",
+    "owners": [
+      "P18-01",
+      "P18-02",
+      "P18-03"
+    ]
+  },
+  "duel_scan": {
+    "command": [
+      "git",
+      "-C",
+      "/Users/korizatou114/Projects/TheTree-managed-worktrees/p24-02-operations/P24-02-implement",
+      "grep",
+      "-n",
+      "-i",
+      "-E",
+      "duel|決闘",
+      "666c87bd7d7c961ae6d7d2ad8d52d6456c31015b",
+      "--",
+      "scripts",
+      "autoload"
+    ],
+    "exit_code": 0,
+    "hits": [
+      "666c87bd7d7c961ae6d7d2ad8d52d6456c31015b:scripts/ui/operation_feedback.gd:15:const CUTIN_DUEL := &\"duel\"",
+      "666c87bd7d7c961ae6d7d2ad8d52d6456c31015b:scripts/ui/operation_feedback.gd:146:## Important warning cut-in dialog: invasion start, duel, defense start"
+    ],
+    "interpretation": "Candidate scripts hits are UI CUTIN_DUEL definition. No production simulation duel generator/executor/save state shown. Absence is not complete-game acceptance.",
+    "owner": "P19-01"
+  },
+  "defense_owner": "P21-01",
+  "all_conditions_accepted": false,
+  "proposal_adopted": false,
+  "source_pins": {
+    "scenes/main/main.gd": {
+      "sha256": "c375ddabc59771f8ddeaa6464c59c98e58a11cd936aa82dde74645594a9fe4e0",
+      "bytes": 141626
+    },
+    "scripts/relationship/relationship_service.gd": {
+      "sha256": "76d49e4fdb50e9a185f7ba5065d257682a11aece1c76272208ba8555ffd534c2",
+      "bytes": 18981
+    },
+    "autoload/simulation_runtime.gd": {
+      "sha256": "d52a995ae715542bbc550f68d35889540658275d12e04ae0b21ac276f5843f39",
+      "bytes": 609584
+    }
+  },
+  "relationship_model_gap": {
+    "source_original_axes": [
+      "Affection",
+      "Lust",
+      "Netorare"
+    ],
+    "current_metric_ids": [
+      "trust",
+      "respect",
+      "affection",
+      "fear",
+      "dependence"
+    ],
+    "current_shield_max": "independently configured rather than bound to original protagonist Affection",
+    "prior_source_audit": "docs/traceability/original/historical_requirements_2026-09-22.json B-7.2 already records same mismatch",
+    "current_verification": "Current RelationshipState METRIC_IDS and configure remain mismatched; no approved replacement found in searched source authority files.",
+    "disposition": "P18-01 original model/save contract first. Retain legacy values without fabricated one-to-one migration; initial/limit/coefficients require original or approved authority."
+  }
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "action": "wait",
+  "task_id": "P24-02",
+  "reason": "P24-02 (submitted 666c87bd, repairs 2/2 used) cannot formally close yet. Under the all-8-conditions rule two conditions are blocked. (1) japanese_input_and_scale: there is no normal new-save-label UI entry; it only opens via diagnostic F8, and the owner has not yet answered on the menu diff proposal or the one-extra-repair request. (2) important_warning_cutin: per the prior worker's record, NTR invasion start and duel generation have no upstream in current production, and the spec forbids claiming complete while upstream is missing. Reordering is justified because P24-02 cannot close until upstream exists. I could not read the original, the plans or the source in this session, so I am not naming which upstream plan ID owns these events. Read-only evidence needed: (a) the BASELINE chapters defining invasion start and duel; (b) the plan ID that owns these events and its state, from the docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02 plan table; (c) a grep of 666c87bd for production emit/ledger sites for invasion/duel signals (absence counts as evidence); (d) ordinary-trigger runtime observation of DEFENSE_RAID_CREATED, with fixture injection excluded. Next close candidate = the owning upstream plan, only if it is independently closable and needs no new values. No worker or repair launched; caps, acceptance denominator and budget unchanged.",
+  "codex_model": "gpt-6.1-sol",
+  "codex_model_reason": "No run is being made, so keep the default. Astra is a candidate only for the upcoming upstream invasion/duel implementation, which spans simulation state, events and UI, where misreading the original would force acceptance rework. Decide after evidence (b)/(c) sizes the work."
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "action": "wait",
+  "task_id": "P24-02",
+  "reason": "P24-02はsubmitted(666c87b)・repairs=2で上限に達しており、追加repair1へのオーナー回答を待っている。BASELINE line143（耐久値0でブレイクしNTR侵食開始）により「盾消失≠NTR開始」というRootの指示は誤りと確定した。表示をNTR侵食開始に戻す1行差分はmain.gdの範囲内の原文準拠修正だが、未採用で、適用にはオーナー判断が要る。shield 0遷移からカットインまでの経路は証明済み。ただし通常の同配置（line145）からの自動attackは未証明で、確認できたcallsiteは_execute_attack_relationship_shieldだけ。決闘はCUTIN_DUELのUI定義しかなく、generator/executor/save stateがない。important_warning_cutin条件は上流に依存する：侵食開始はP18-01/02、決闘はP19-01（P18/P05依存）、防衛はP21-01（P05/P13/P14/P17依存）で、いずれもplanned。P03/P17/P05/P13/P14の受入状況は未確認のまま推測しない。P01-01（catalog・追加施設の適用範囲）はin_progress。部分点なしの規定により、P24-02はこれらを明示依存として残し、完了と主張しない。先行作業の順序は「上流の受入状況確認→P01-01→P18-01/02→P19-01・P21-01→P24-02のカットイン実信号での最終検証」。新しいworkerもrepairも起動しない。",
+  "codex_model": "gpt-6.1-sol",
+  "codex_model_reason": "今回はwaitで起動しないため、既定のgpt-6.1-solを選ぶ。オーナー承認後に想定される作業はmain.gdの1行の表示修正と既存の証拠経路での再検証で、難しくなく、品質・時間・使用量の面で上位モデルは要らない。P18/P19の関係モデルや決闘シミュレーションの設計はgpt-6-astraが向く可能性があるが、別タスクとして起票するときに改めて判断する。"
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+--- a/scenes/main/main.gd
+++ b/scenes/main/main.gd
+@@ -3199,2 +3199,2 @@
+-				show_warning_cutin(OperationFeedbackScript.CUTIN_INVASION, "重要警告：愛の盾消失", "愛の盾が消失しました。人物関係を確認してください。")
+-
+				show_warning_cutin(OperationFeedbackScript.CUTIN_INVASION, "重要警告：NTR侵食開始", "愛の盾が破られ、NTR侵食が始まりました。人物関係を確認してください。")
+