docs: record actual D05 approvals and P26 whole-review repairs

2026-10-18 09:02:00 +09:00
parent e6fb757480
commit a13f7c0b79
11 changed files with 255 additions and 43 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "action": "wait",
+  "task_id": "P04-01",
+  "reason": "WAIT. The owner asked for planning only. No repair while the P26 doc repair is active. The repair counter stays at 29 and nothing new is dispatched. D05 is not open any more. The actual human approved all 4 remaining policies on 2026-10-18 (call_5fa8987f83284eb58b685002499cb9df), recorded in build/owner-handoff/d05-approved-20261018/D05_ACTUAL_HUMAN_APPROVAL.json. The approved rules are:\n- Command destruction is processed before completion. Accident or raid destruction is processed after completion and payment: that minute's sale stays valid, and the failure and reservation release happen in the next minute.\n- A sale that completes at 00:00 belongs to the new day. The previous day's settlement and upkeep are fixed before the completion.\n- When dependency closure and power loss coincide, the closure reason is shown. Both pause progress and charging and keep the reservation.\n- The exit command is processed before completion. An AI planned exit applies only to deciding guests and is processed after completion.\nThe earlier dependency-hold rule, the 18:00 shift order and the A01 upkeep rule stay unchanged.\n\nNext P04 repair plan, to be issued as one normal request-repair on the existing task (2dde759, repair 30) only after P26 closes. P04 is next in priority. No duplicate P13/P18/P23 worker.\n\n1) Decision record (allowed path execution/p04-01/**). Add D05_REMAINING_APPROVAL.json. It cites the handoff approval file by path and SHA256, quotes the 4 answers exactly, and gives each a stable ID: D05-P04-DESTRUCTION, D05-P04-MIDNIGHT-DAY, D05-P04-PAUSE-REASON, D05-P04-EXIT. It sets formal_acceptance=false. Mark D05_REMAINING_ORDER_CANDIDATE.md/json as superseded by the approval. Do not delete them.\n\n2) Checker, registry and pins (tools/check_p04_order_evidence.py). Fix the REQUIRED authority refs:\n- destruction_stop: replace the wrong BASELINE:183 binding (183 is mana depletion) with D05-P04-DESTRUCTION.\n- power_stop: add D05-P04-PAUSE-REASON. Keep BASELINE:183 only where it truly covers power.\n- exit_release and patience_release: add D05-P04-EXIT.\n- paused_midnight and midnight_settlement: add D05-P04-MIDNIGHT-DAY.\nMake the checker require the approval record and its hash, and fail when any mandatory D05 ID is missing. Rerun the existing negative, role and applicability fixtures and add one negative case per new ID. Do not change measurement thresholds or the 15 conditions + EV.\n\n3) Evidence that each rule is actually exercised. Do not relabel existing evidence. Map each approved order to an existing S1–S4 raw record only if that record's source, config, input and environment match the current version exactly. Already known:\n- S4 caused NO_POWER by a direct disconnect, not real depletion.\n- No raw record covers the accident-destruction next-minute release, a 00:00 completion booked to the new day, or a command exit versus an AI exit.\nFor each such gap, report \"probe needed\" with a concrete boundary case. Root then runs the minimal native probe on the current product (5f6bc11d). No product code changes; game_source_write_authorized=false.\n\n4) Docs. Update ORDER_AUDIT.md, order-audit.json and CURRENT_STATUS.md. All 7 domains keep their current function and line references. Remove the 'pending a–d' wording. Status stays 14/88 formal (the stale 13 must be corrected) with no partial credit.\n\n5) After the worker submits, Root runs:\n- validation p04-acceptance and Local8 on the new checker SHA;\n- the new index from the existing r22 collection plus any new probe raw;\n- a final full regression on exactly the final source and checker. Do not reuse the old f5 full178 (checker f5 is not the final a61 checker). Bind tests/business/test_required_kitchen.gd separately.\nThen a whole-unit independent Opus review of the full current file roster, followed by the normal prepare-integration, integration and final, in the order P04 first, then the support work on main 9b1a18c1. Native-Windows conditions stay individually pending if they are required.\n\nEstimates: worker edits about 15–40 KB of docs and checker, about 1 Codex session (roughly 1–3M input tokens cached, 30–60 min). Possible native probes take about 0.5–1.5 h of Root time. The full regression has previously taken hours. Review material is about 1–3 MB. No cost, API or security expansion, and no change to the acceptance denominator.",
+  "codex_model": "gpt-6.1-sol",
+  "codex_model_reason": "The next repair is bounded and fully specified. It records 4 approved decisions, fixes authority refs in a fixed REQUIRED table, adds the matching negative fixtures and updates the docs. No product logic changes and no new design reasoning are needed. The evidence mapping uses existing raw records, and Root does the native probes. Sol is good enough for this and costs less time and usage. Astra's extra reasoning would not clearly improve the result."
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+{
+  "source": "Actual human reply in this same chat, questionItem call_5fa8987f83284eb58b685002499cb9df",
+  "received_client_date_jst": "2026-10-18",
+  "original_plan_id": "P04-01",
+  "decision": "D05 remaining order policies",
+  "approved": [
+    {
+      "id": "destruction_completion_order",
+      "question_item": 0,
+      "answer_exact": "現行順序を承認する（Opus推奨）",
+      "approved_question_policy": "コマンド破壊をサービス完了前に処理。事故・襲撃による破壊は完了・課金後に処理してその分の売上を有効とし、次の分で失敗処理と予約解放。"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "midnight_revenue_day",
+      "question_item": 1,
+      "answer_exact": "新しい日に計上し、前日決算・維持費を完了より先に確定する（Opus推奨・現状維持）",
+      "approved_question_policy": "00:00完了のサービス売上は新しい日に計上。前日決算・維持費は完了より先に確定。既承認の維持費規則と18:00交代順序を維持。"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "pause_reason_priority",
+      "question_item": 2,
+      "answer_exact": "2点とも現行動作を確定する（Opus推奨）",
+      "approved_question_policy": "停電と依存先休業が同時なら休業を理由表示の優先とする。どちらも進捗・課金停止、予約保持。"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "exit_command_ai_order",
+      "question_item": 2,
+      "answer_exact": "2点とも現行動作を確定する（Opus推奨）",
+      "approved_question_policy": "退出コマンドは完了前、AIの予定退出は判断中の客だけを対象として完了後に処理。"
+    }
+  ],
+  "prior_approved_rules_preserved": [
+    "依存先休業中は進捗・課金停止、予約保持、復帰後1回だけ完了",
+    "17:59→18:00昼番作業を先に確定し完了・課金後に交代",
+    "既承認維持費規則"
+  ],
+  "boundary": "These are actual product-order approvals, not acceptance/completion or new candidate-SHA approval. No new values/content/permission/cost change. Counter history retained.",
+  "next": "Actual Opus resumes existing P04 task2dde759 with existing evidence after in-flight P26 repair closure, planning only in parallel."
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+{
+  "actual_opus": "0e5dee1afba14d56877edba14796b6a2",
+  "preserved_P04_S": "2dde7596a87c43f7bf0bf704b7479f2fa06a5b1c",
+  "no_worker_started": true,
+  "no_repaircounter_increment": true,
+  "formal_total_current": 15,
+  "stale_plan_labels": [
+    "Opus wording14/88 is old; currentformal15/88",
+    "Opus product5f6bc11d/main9b1a18c labels are old; rebind exact actual currentM/source/settings/roster beforeanyprobes, never relabel old results"
+  ],
+  "next": "After P26 closure, nextactualP04commander must see latest main15/88 and decide exactS/Q/M repair/test inputs. Actual4D05answers not pending."
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+{
+  "at_unix_ns": 1792281637586363000,
+  "removed": [
+    {
+      "path": "/Users/korizatou114/Projects/TheTree-managed-worktrees/p19-03-reachability/P19-03-TABLE-final-188a0a94",
+      "head": "8e4f1d92fc2a2e8f1dd187e661cf52b13e4e51d4",
+      "files": 4949,
+      "logical_bytes": 233247791
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "/Users/korizatou114/Projects/TheTree-managed-worktrees/p19-03-reachability/P19-03-TABLE-integration-69419f96",
+      "head": "8e4f1d92fc2a2e8f1dd187e661cf52b13e4e51d4",
+      "files": 4949,
+      "logical_bytes": 233247791
+    }
+  ],
+  "free_before_bytes": 865939456,
+  "free_after_bytes": 1365258240,
+  "observed_gain_bytes": 499318784,
+  "all_source_blobs_verified": true,
+  "all_unique_runtime_evidence_preserved": true,
+  "restore_manifest": "/Users/korizatou114/Projects/TheTree-managed-worktrees/p19-03-reachability/.runtime/coordinator-start-20261017/ENDED_FINAL_INTEGRATION_CHECKOUT_FULL_GIT_RESTORE_PROOF.json",
+  "restore_manifest_sha256": "c6172ba00a383659159d82751ffbcea36188c56cdf2d346252c8af7a385fc1b7"
+}
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  "original_plan_id": "P26-01",
  "registered_project": "the-tree-p26-01-ledger",
  "registered_task": "P26-01-LEDGER",
-  "state": "implementing",
+  "state": "repair_pending",
  "actual_selection": "6b9bb7f7a8474689b4094efbfcde2eef",
  "base_commit": "379a1ba8fd25b5ad24226178a2492f91761dc31d",
  "original_denominator": {
@@ -16,10 +16,10 @@
  "full_acceptance": "原本で要求された未制作内容を欠損として記録し、架空の完成数を置かない。",
  "dependencies": "Audit observes P19/P20/P22 actual state; does not accept their production. Pending D08/D09 explicit. P04 existing D05 questions retained.",
  "missing": [
-    "whole required content ledger and all original-source coverage",
-    "actual registered checks, exact source applicability",
-    "separate whole-unit Opus review",
-    "normal prepare-integration and candidate integration/final; ledger only after all pass"
+    "Repair original content clause omissions and independent atomic/source coverage",
+    "Correct requirement-level owner/status/partial support and strengthen corresponding negatives",
+    "Repeat only necessary modified registered checks on newS, independent whole-unit review",
+    "normal candidate integration/final and qualified native reuse then ledger"
  ],
  "reuse": [
    "P19-03 accepted table S903a2c566e73cebc874a6499410a1243bc190a63/C8e4f1d92fc2a2e8f1dd187e661cf52b13e4e51d4",
@@ -29,16 +29,7 @@
  "model": "actual Opus selects; proposed gpt-6.1-sol",
  "storage_estimate_scope": "Opus under5MB is output-material estimate, excludes required Runner checkout copies (~240MB each); stage copies, recover only ended fully restorable duplicates",
  "actual_commander_run_direction": "3e55ca8b6dcf476a81ae20728bcb6290",
-  "actual_jobs": [
-    {
-      "id": "753fb93320c644979504a86a78501be9",
-      "role": "implementer",
-      "status": "running",
-      "pid": 61835,
-      "artifact": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p26-01-ledger/runs/753fb93320c644979504a86a78501be9",
-      "pid_alive_observed": true
-    }
-  ],
+  "actual_jobs": [],
  "repairs": 2,
  "repair_limit": null,
  "setup_attempt": {
@@ -58,5 +49,28 @@
    "writes": 0,
    "result": "Prior commander direction incorrectly assumed existing P26 outputs. Actual Opus818862 withdrew assumption and actual3e55ca authorized creating all5newfiles; immutable spec unchanged. Three precreation invocations exited2 missing script, not actual tests or acceptance."
  },
-  "original_unit_credit_added": 0
+  "original_unit_credit_added": 0,
+  "S": "35b3de0d59d41633fe89678e742f35f4df620618",
+  "submitted_source": "35b3de0d59d41633fe89678e742f35f4df620618",
+  "formal_validation": {
+    "passed": true,
+    "all_registered_checks": 3,
+    "meaningful_self_tests": 13,
+    "scope": "sameS35b3de0 docs/source only, not whole acceptance"
+  },
+  "whole_original_review": {
+    "actual_run": "8a8f40a333de4f0f993bc757c665c696",
+    "model": "claude-opus-5-5",
+    "status": "changes_requested",
+    "high": 2,
+    "medium": 2,
+    "low": 1,
+    "artifact": "ROOT_WHOLE_REVIEW_35B3DE0D.json"
+  },
+  "D05_current_human_answers": "All4remaining rules approved clientdate2026-10-18; separateP04adoptionnext. Frozenf4/379audit must explicitlylabel historicalsource.",
+  "native_reuse": {
+    "exact1368inputs_settings_policy_marker_engine_roster_defaultplayer_equal": true,
+    "actual_proof": "ROOT_EXACT_SUBMITTED_35b3de0d_GAME_INPUT_REUSE.json",
+    "new_native_runs": 0
+  }
 }
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+{
+  "task_id": "P26-01-LEDGER",
+  "commit": "35b3de0d59d41633fe89678e742f35f4df620618",
+  "status": "changes_requested",
+  "summary": "Independent whole-unit review of P26-01 (AC-P26-01) at 35b3de0. What holds: all 5 outputs are inside allowed_paths. All 3 Runner validations exited 0: --check printed pass with selected_files 1368 and parse_files 329; the negative suite ran 13 tests, OK; --source-binding-only also passed. No row claims 'produced', every required_count/completed_count is null, and accounting stays at 15/88 with credit 0 and whole_unit_accepted false. D05, D08 and D09 are recorded as unresolved. The 21 route rows keep the exact 7 original names (BASELINE 118–124) crossed with 純愛/NTR/堕落, each tied to its P19 cell, where natural_route_complete is false. The 614 P22-01 usage records are kept, and their status is derived from the actual representation type: only code_drawn and placeholder_media exist, so rows are code-drawing, placeholder or missing. Rivals (line 125) and per-route event CG (line 243) appear through the P22 usage slots. Endings are split into all/bad/game_over with no invented counts, and the task-spec/selection/pin binding and the definition projection look correct. Acceptance is NOT met as a whole unit, for three reasons. (1) Some event and dialogue content the original requires is never recorded: BASELINE line 65 (night NTR events), line 196 (the 代物弁済 event), and lines 13/53/221–222 (peeping-view, recorder and intervention content). None of them are cited anywhere in the 651 rows. (2) The checker cannot catch this kind of gap. Clause coverage comes from hard-coded line spans inside the checker, and verify() finishes by comparing the ledger to a canonical document built by the same function that wrote it with --write. There is no independent clause-coverage check, which the spec forbids as the sole verification. (3) The ledger is never linked to atomic_requirements.json, which the spec lists as an authority: zero AR.* IDs are referenced, including AR.heroine.*.route.*, AR.progression.all_endings, AR.progression.encyclopedia_complete, AR.events.ntr_night_peak, AR.guest.debt_settlement_imprisonment and AR.asset.character_voice. Owner and status for the clause.* rows are also hard-coded rather than derived from evidence. Because there is no partial credit, P26-01 should not be credited and the count must stay at 15/88 until these are fixed and the unit is reviewed again.",
+  "acceptance_ids": [
+    "AC-P26-01"
+  ],
+  "findings": [
+    {
+      "severity": "high",
+      "message": "Some original event/dialogue content clauses are missing from the ledger. BASELINE.txt line 65 (夜…NTRイベント発生のピーク), line 196 (女性客は「代物弁済」イベントで即座に奴隷化・投獄) and lines 13/53/221-222 (peeping view, 記録係 collecting 脅迫ネタ, intervention) are not cited by any of the 651 rows. Grep for 代物弁済, NTRイベント発生, 覗き見し and 記録係 returns 0 matches, and no citation starts at lines 65 or 196. dialogue.all cites only 155/230/256. The spec requires covering every original-required dialogue/event slot, or recording it as explicitly undefined, so these required-but-unproduced event contents are not recorded as missing, as AC-P26-01 requires."
+    },
+    {
+      "severity": "high",
+      "message": "Clause-coverage verification is circular. expected() builds the rows from hard-coded BASELINE spans in check_content_ledger.py:177-205, and verify() ends with an exact equality check against that same canonical document, which --write also produced (check_content_ledger.py:289, 331). Nothing independently computes which BASELINE clauses are content-relevant, for example a closed list of required line numbers, or a cross-check against atomic_requirements entries for routes, endings, encyclopedia, events, portraits and voice. So an omitted clause, like the ones in the first finding, passes --check and the 13 tests. Most negative tests (kind 'invented', extra key, identity name) are caught only by that same equality check. The spec forbids using tautological generated facts as the sole verification of 'exact original full clause coverage'."
+    },
+    {
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "message": "There is no traceability to atomic_requirements.json, although the spec lists it as an authority. The ledger references no AR.* IDs (grep returns 0). Relevant mandatory items exist and are not reconciled with the ledger, for example: AR.heroine.<7>.route.{love,ntr,corruption}, AR.progression.all_endings, AR.progression.encyclopedia_complete, AR.narrative.route_tones, AR.events.ntr_night_peak, AR.guest.debt_settlement_imprisonment, AR.unique.bad_end_transformation, AR.asset.character_voice, AR.asset.main_portraits/sub_portraits/portrait_*, AR.asset.route_event_cg, and AR.schedule.B-14.2.scenario/B-14.3.voice_*. Without this mapping, nothing shows that every relevant atomic requirement has a ledger row."
+    },
+    {
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "message": "Owner and status for the clause.* rows are hard-coded instead of derived from evidence. All eight clause rows (world, scope, route_skills, route_rules, art, cg, motion, production) get owner 'P26-03' and status 'missing' with empty evidence (check_content_ledger.py:196-205), and the owner enum is fixed to {D08, P26-02, P26-03}. This assigns game-mechanic clauses (shield, three duel types, history/pregnancy state, route skills) to the production-acceptance unit P26-03. It also leaves no way to name the P22 production packages or other upstream owners that the IMPLEMENTATION_REPORT itself names. Meanwhile, the existing OriginalRelationshipState / relationship_service support is recorded only in the top-level actual_support and is not reflected as 'partial' on the rows it relates to. The spec asks that each requirement name its actual owning remaining deliverable or decision and distinguish partial from missing."
+    },
+    {
+      "severity": "low",
+      "message": "The negative tests mutate only rows[0] (the chapters.all row) for the owner/status/kind/count checks, and only a single route row for identity. No test covers status/owner tampering on route or usage rows, or a stale evidence SHA inside a usage row's representation pin, other than through the equality check. Test strength is therefore lower than the 13-test count suggests."
+    }
+  ]
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+{
+  "source_actual_review_packet": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p26-01-ledger/runs/8a8f40a333de4f0f993bc757c665c696/packet.txt",
+  "restored_path": "/private/tmp/the-tree-p24-02-control-r02/AGENTS.md",
+  "recorded_rules_sha256": "cb19c16aa0e2f8b70465777ae32cc5d9210733363c30206a0032a42cda625047",
+  "canonical_stripped_equal": true,
+  "permission_policy_change": false,
+  "repair_counter_change": false,
+  "cause": "missing after date boundary; deletion cause not yet established",
+  "date_jst": "2026-10-18"
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+{
+  "rows": [
+    {
+      "role": "commander",
+      "sha256": "d0d5825308b1b193799cb765e8d128a084c1cd1967e97239c3d269d09427ab6c",
+      "actual_previous_packet": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p26-01-ledger/runs/3e55ca8b6dcf476a81ae20728bcb6290/packet.txt",
+      "exact_template_in_previous_prefix": true
+    },
+    {
+      "role": "implementer",
+      "sha256": "5b1f0136cc36e1cbea343eadc6820e8dd5e037ede4794126a0fa67acaa11dbd8",
+      "actual_previous_packet": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p26-01-ledger/runs/753fb93320c644979504a86a78501be9/packet.txt",
+      "exact_template_in_previous_prefix": true
+    },
+    {
+      "role": "reviewer",
+      "sha256": "ef431ec4ad0fff1964a382643429b59db59e24b8cc3dfcf61fea7cdc5608c7ba",
+      "actual_previous_packet": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p26-01-ledger/runs/8a8f40a333de4f0f993bc757c665c696/packet.txt",
+      "exact_template_in_previous_prefix": true
+    }
+  ],
+  "no_gate_model_permission_change": true,
+  "user_client_date_jst": "2026-10-18"
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+{
+  "restored_missing_files": [
+    {
+      "path": "/private/tmp/the-tree-p24-02-control-r02/schemas/result.json",
+      "sha256": "7cd8c0dfd013800322df8d6dee344f29677c00881ced6b586bc11d9b0b6ce44e"
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "/private/tmp/the-tree-p24-02-control-r02/schemas/task.json",
+      "sha256": "23866bc8c27e1e4782185ea1834f6211bf479585a7d9498ae8be10e78bbdba4e"
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "/private/tmp/the-tree-p24-02-control-r02/schemas/decision.json",
+      "sha256": "d0e84bb79d09c179c656a7f05553f9d95a808a1529808d4e3b950ecf6dd8fa2d"
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "/private/tmp/the-tree-p24-02-control-r02/policies/default.json",
+      "sha256": "dbafea6c8afebf8855e769f33ee8ae80a733b89b7e3cb7759e5bb0fb0a179f2a",
+      "authority": "existing owner-approved active P26 project effective policy, user removed caps"
+    }
+  ],
+  "actual_result_schema_same_after_existing_task_commit_narrowing": true,
+  "actual_model_state_narrowing_still_OwnerCLI": true,
+  "existing_project_config_baseline_unchanged": true
+}
@@ -10527,13 +10527,13 @@
    },
    "whole_game_acceptance": false
  },
-  "next_closure_note": "ActualOpus6b9bb7 selects whole originalP26-01 audit; P04 existing D05 questions retained, P24 sourcefe44f55 preserved. Original15/88, newcredit0.",
+  "next_closure_note": "P26 current whole review requires repairs, original15/88 unchanged. Actual human2026-10-18 approved4remainingD05policies; P04 is next aftercurrentP26, no duplicate worker.",
  "current_p26_01_content_ledger": {
    "at": "2026-10-17T20:44:25.180745+09:00",
    "original_plan_id": "P26-01",
    "registered_project": "the-tree-p26-01-ledger",
    "registered_task": "P26-01-LEDGER",
-    "state": "implementing",
+    "state": "repair_pending",
    "actual_selection": "6b9bb7f7a8474689b4094efbfcde2eef",
    "base_commit": "379a1ba8fd25b5ad24226178a2492f91761dc31d",
    "original_denominator": {
@@ -10546,10 +10546,10 @@
    "full_acceptance": "原本で要求された未制作内容を欠損として記録し、架空の完成数を置かない。",
    "dependencies": "Audit observes P19/P20/P22 actual state; does not accept their production. Pending D08/D09 explicit. P04 existing D05 questions retained.",
    "missing": [
-      "whole required content ledger and all original-source coverage",
-      "actual registered checks, exact source applicability",
-      "separate whole-unit Opus review",
-      "normal prepare-integration and candidate integration/final; ledger only after all pass"
+      "Repair original content clause omissions and independent atomic/source coverage",
+      "Correct requirement-level owner/status/partial support and strengthen corresponding negatives",
+      "Repeat only necessary modified registered checks on newS, independent whole-unit review",
+      "normal candidate integration/final and qualified native reuse then ledger"
    ],
    "reuse": [
      "P19-03 accepted table S903a2c566e73cebc874a6499410a1243bc190a63/C8e4f1d92fc2a2e8f1dd187e661cf52b13e4e51d4",
@@ -10559,16 +10559,7 @@
    "model": "actual Opus selects; proposed gpt-6.1-sol",
    "storage_estimate_scope": "Opus under5MB is output-material estimate, excludes required Runner checkout copies (~240MB each); stage copies, recover only ended fully restorable duplicates",
    "actual_commander_run_direction": "3e55ca8b6dcf476a81ae20728bcb6290",
-    "actual_jobs": [
-      {
-        "id": "753fb93320c644979504a86a78501be9",
-        "role": "implementer",
-        "status": "running",
-        "pid": 61835,
-        "artifact": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p26-01-ledger/runs/753fb93320c644979504a86a78501be9",
-        "pid_alive_observed": true
-      }
-    ],
+    "actual_jobs": [],
    "repairs": 2,
    "repair_limit": null,
    "setup_attempt": {
@@ -10588,6 +10579,36 @@
      "writes": 0,
      "result": "Prior commander direction incorrectly assumed existing P26 outputs. Actual Opus818862 withdrew assumption and actual3e55ca authorized creating all5newfiles; immutable spec unchanged. Three precreation invocations exited2 missing script, not actual tests or acceptance."
    },
-    "original_unit_credit_added": 0
+    "original_unit_credit_added": 0,
+    "S": "35b3de0d59d41633fe89678e742f35f4df620618",
+    "submitted_source": "35b3de0d59d41633fe89678e742f35f4df620618",
+    "formal_validation": {
+      "passed": true,
+      "all_registered_checks": 3,
+      "meaningful_self_tests": 13,
+      "scope": "sameS35b3de0 docs/source only, not whole acceptance"
+    },
+    "whole_original_review": {
+      "actual_run": "8a8f40a333de4f0f993bc757c665c696",
+      "model": "claude-opus-5-5",
+      "status": "changes_requested",
+      "high": 2,
+      "medium": 2,
+      "low": 1,
+      "artifact": "ROOT_WHOLE_REVIEW_35B3DE0D.json"
+    },
+    "D05_current_human_answers": "All4remaining rules approved clientdate2026-10-18; separateP04adoptionnext. Frozenf4/379audit must explicitlylabel historicalsource.",
+    "native_reuse": {
+      "exact1368inputs_settings_policy_marker_engine_roster_defaultplayer_equal": true,
+      "actual_proof": "ROOT_EXACT_SUBMITTED_35b3de0d_GAME_INPUT_REUSE.json",
+      "new_native_runs": 0
+    }
+  },
+  "p04_remaining_D05_actual_approval": {
+    "path": "docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p04-01-owner-approval-20261018/D05_ACTUAL_HUMAN_APPROVAL.json",
+    "all4approved": true,
+    "product_adoption_pending": true,
+    "existing_source": "2dde7596a87c43f7bf0bf704b7479f2fa06a5b1c",
+    "next_after_P26": true
  }
 }
@@ -3856,6 +3856,12 @@
            "path": "docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p04-01-current-recheck-20261017/CURRENT_ACCEPTANCE_STATUS.json",
            "sha256": "908111f64a3d6c206504e26e76c721a0a97864238f6f6bb6604ac7b8e31ce7bf",
            "scope": "Actual latest29 state and Opus re-audit supersede stale repair19 remaining work; zero formal credit"
+          },
+          {
+            "path": "docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p04-01-owner-approval-20261018/D05_ACTUAL_HUMAN_APPROVAL.json",
+            "sha256_at_integration": "cd365ded1b777a0327d090709f0a4161f5005562819183455d9f2e106fba3e96",
+            "scope": "Actual user approval of remaining4D05rules only; not implementation/acceptance",
+            "linked_at_jst": "2026-10-18"
          }
        ],
        "current_summary": "次に閉じる優先候補。実Runnerは提出2dde7596・修正29・repair_pending・未稼働、worktree差分0。実Opus ea12167cが最新29を再監査し、旧台帳のraw結合/getter/HEAD fixture等は既修正と確認、重複repairを起動しない。登録validationはpassでも正式レビュー275d1fd6はD05規則未確定等で不合格。破壊順序・00:00売上帰属と理由表示/退出の明文化を具体案で確認中。既承認2規則維持。全15+EV/7領域/安全性3結果/全条件・必須最終全回帰・独立wholeレビュー・通常integration/finalは維持。正式14/88、今回加算0。",
@@ -3864,11 +3870,11 @@
          "after actual answers, normal batched checker destruction-authority pin / registry / approval record / stale current metadata correction",
          "final gates as listed; previous full178 f5 receipt is not full final checker a61 evidence; no relabeling"
        ],
-        "progress_summary": "次に閉じる優先候補。実Runnerは提出2dde7596・修正29・repair_pending・未稼働、worktree差分0。実Opus ea12167cが最新29を再監査し、旧台帳のraw結合/getter/HEAD fixture等は既修正と確認、重複repairを起動しない。登録validationはpassでも正式レビュー275d1fd6はD05規則未確定等で不合格。破壊順序・00:00売上帰属と理由表示/退出の明文化を具体案で確認中。既承認2規則維持。全15+EV/7領域/安全性3結果/全条件・必須最終全回帰・独立wholeレビュー・通常integration/finalは維持。正式14/88、今回加算0。",
+        "progress_summary": "2026-10-18実ユーザーがD05残4規則を承認。既存2dde759/repair29保持、承認記録をOpusへ渡し再開準備。P26修正後に同一P04を優先、未受入・無加算。",
        "remaining_gaps": [
-          "owner choices for destruction order and midnight-sale day, plus explicit disposition of reason label and command/AI exit",
-          "after actual answers, normal batched checker destruction-authority pin / registry / approval record / stale current metadata correction",
-          "final gates as listed; previous full178 f5 receipt is not full final checker a61 evidence; no relabeling"
+          "Adopt actual 2026-10-18 remaining4D05 approvals into authoritative rule/registry/approval/source pins; no owner answer remains pending for these4",
+          "Apply actual Opus-approved necessary batched corrections on preserved2dde759",
+          "Exact final current-roster regression and all original conditions/independent whole review/normal integration/final; oldf5full178 not finala61 evidence"
        ],
        "updated_at_jst": "2026-10-17T16:30:38.746525+09:00",
        "current_recheck": "execution/p04-01-current-recheck-20261017/CURRENT_ACCEPTANCE_STATUS.json",
@@ -17152,16 +17158,16 @@
          {
            "path": "docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p26-01/ROOT_CURRENT_ACCEPTANCE_STATUS.json",
            "scope": "Registered audit start only, no original-unit acceptance",
-            "sha256_at_integration": "5fa789fcd9992632c685b55c32cbb4b8c31694c11bf09d536b1bbf405b7f361e",
+            "sha256_at_integration": "02ab9b68953a798cc6ed2422c8440909622c59357fe03768224c67b0fa28ff78",
            "linked_at_jst": "2026-10-17T20:36:24.754292+09:00"
          }
        ],
-        "progress_summary": "実Opus6b9bb7選定。資料渡しと先行成果の誤前提を解消し、実Opus3e55caの新規5出力作成指示で同一Runner753fb9/Codex6.1-sol実装中。修正2/null、完了加算0。",
+        "progress_summary": "提出35b3de0で登録3検証/13負例PASS、全1368入力一致。しかし実whole-unit Opus8a8f40が原文条項欠落・独立網羅性・AR対応・owner/statusを要修正。無加算、同一タスク修正中。",
        "remaining_gaps": [
-          "whole required content ledger and all original-source coverage",
-          "actual registered checks, exact source applicability",
-          "separate whole-unit Opus review",
-          "normal prepare-integration and candidate integration/final; ledger only after all pass"
+          "Repair original content clause omissions and independent atomic/source coverage",
+          "Correct requirement-level owner/status/partial support and strengthen corresponding negatives",
+          "Repeat only necessary modified registered checks on newS, independent whole-unit review",
+          "normal candidate integration/final and qualified native reuse then ledger"
        ],
        "updated_at_jst": "2026-10-17T20:36:24.754292+09:00"
      },