docs: retain P19 whole-review findings and same-task repair status
This commit is contained in:
Takeshi
+24
-8
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"at_jst": "2026-10-17T19:39:39.105864+09:00",
|
||||
"at_jst": "2026-10-17T19:50:02.321271+09:00",
|
||||
"plan_id": "P19-03",
|
||||
"registered_task": "P19-03-TABLE",
|
||||
"project": "the-tree-p19-03-reachability",
|
||||
"S": "e0420d57a381a1644357f0590536e1d47c9bca9f",
|
||||
"implementation_model": "gpt-6.1-sol",
|
||||
"actual_model_decision": "c767de1cd89d40e5a23964f2e62ce4c6",
|
||||
"state": "whole_original_independent_review_running",
|
||||
"state": "repair1_in_progress_after_whole_review",
|
||||
"original_acceptance": "7名×3ルートの到達表があり、未制作内容は欠損として残る。",
|
||||
"original_units": 88,
|
||||
"formally_completed": 14,
|
||||
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@
|
||||
},
|
||||
"actual_reviewer": {
|
||||
"id": "d4e70e7f48f549b085692962f88531a8",
|
||||
"status": "running",
|
||||
"pid": 30223,
|
||||
"status": "finished_changes_requested",
|
||||
"artifact": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p19-03-reachability/runs/d4e70e7f48f549b085692962f88531a8"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"reviewer_model": "claude-opus-5-5",
|
||||
@@ -36,9 +35,9 @@
|
||||
"artifact": "ROOT_EXACT_GAME_INPUT_REUSE_E0420D5.json"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"required_before_acceptance": [
|
||||
"Actual Opus whole-original semantic review of all21cells, original §6–7/source/code/status/gaps; pending",
|
||||
"Normal actual integrationC/M, candidate source/evidence equality and final; pending",
|
||||
"Original unit ledger closure and push; pending"
|
||||
"Complete same-source scoped repair and registered3checks on its actual submittedSHA",
|
||||
"Separate actual whole-original Opus re-review of corrected21cells+allfindings",
|
||||
"Normal actual integrationC/M, exactequality andfinal, thenledger/push"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"source_gaps_preserved": [
|
||||
"Six missing productioncatalog IDs are not fabricated; table audit uses existing original atomic entity keys",
|
||||
@@ -49,5 +48,22 @@
|
||||
"Initial registered {worktree} invocation failed before scripts opened; exact-root adapter madeactual3sameSchecks run, repairs0/source/config/policy unchanged",
|
||||
"Initial full inline review rejected beforeinference at actual1milliontoken providerlimit; completefile/diff sourceviews retainalloriginalbytes, no file/bytecaps, sameOpus5.5/sourceS"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"normal_integration_candidate": null
|
||||
"normal_integration_candidate": null,
|
||||
"repairs": 1,
|
||||
"repair_cap": null,
|
||||
"whole_original_review": {
|
||||
"run_id": "d4e70e7f48f549b085692962f88531a8",
|
||||
"status": "changes_requested",
|
||||
"medium": 1,
|
||||
"low": 3,
|
||||
"artifact": "ROOT_WHOLE_REVIEW_E0420D5.json"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"actual_repair_worker": {
|
||||
"id": "bf8a86e053044bfea0051253fefb2ec7",
|
||||
"role": "implementer",
|
||||
"status": "finished",
|
||||
"pid": 33968,
|
||||
"artifact": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p19-03-reachability/runs/bf8a86e053044bfea0051253fefb2ec7"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"repair_scope": "Same5Docfiles: legacy presence vsoriginalconformance for4clauses, independent source-presence/evidence-loss tests, route-ending interruption crossrefs, precise hash labels. No game/values/pins/roster changes."
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+27
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"task_id": "P19-03-TABLE",
|
||||
"commit": "e0420d57a381a1644357f0590536e1d47c9bca9f",
|
||||
"status": "changes_requested",
|
||||
"summary": "Independent read-only whole-unit review of P19-03 at e0420d5 against BASELINE §6 (lines 114–135) and §7 (136–161), the B-7.x atomic records, work_packages and the immutable TASK_SPEC.\n\nWhat passes:\n- Scope: the diff adds only the 5 required files under execution/p19-03/**. TASK_SPEC, pins, selection record, original registers and game files are unchanged.\n- Roster and routes: exactly 7 original names (アンリ, フィーネ, トマリ, アメリア, リズ, ミミ, サツキ, matching BASELINE lines 118–124 and atomic entity keys AR.heroine.<key>.route.{love,ntr,corruption}) × 純愛/NTR/堕落 gives 21 cells. I confirmed the catalog has only heroine_anri/rival_rai and that original_relationship_state.gd has no roster, so using atomic keys and keeping the other six as gaps is honest and invents no IDs.\n- Gaps: every cell keeps 8 categories, separates common rules from character-specific content, marks character-specific content 欠損/D08 pending with a plausible owner (P18-02/P19-01/P19-02/P20-02/P26-01/P26-02), and sets natural_route_complete=false. Thresholds, rates, initial values and D05/D08 stay pending. Original citations quote exact line text with the baseline hash. Implemented/partial evidence carries path+SHA, bound to anchor 1b07b87 by blob equality.\n- Validation: the 3 registered checks ran on the same commit and exit 0 (10 self-tests OK; source binding 1368 files, file_equality true). The 3 initial exit-2 runs were literal `{worktree}` placeholders that never opened a script; no failure was converted to PASS.\n- Under the original acceptance wording the table structurally exists and missing content stays as gaps.\n\nWhat fails:\n- The 'audit existing support' requirement is not met, and several statuses are inaccurate. The audit marks coassignment_attack, zero_break, love_actions (shield recovery) and threshold_route_loss as \"not implemented\" with no source path. But the frozen game source has live legacy mechanisms for exactly these clauses:\n - relationship_service.gd: apply_shield_attack (reports shield_broken), restore_shield, request_route_lock/confirm_route_lock (irreversible route lock).\n - simulation_runtime.gd registers request_route_lock/confirm_route_lock as commands; line 6850 calls apply_shield_attack.\n - event_service.gd lines 1039/1047 apply these as event effects.\n - placement_risk_preview_service.gd computes heroine/rival contact intervals and _shield_attack_candidates.\n- Meanwhile a legacy UI label constant in main.gd is credited as 'partial'. Treating legacy support inconsistently undermines the audit's accuracy for downstream owners.\n\nThe legacy mechanisms need not count as original support (P18-01 forbids one-to-one conversion), but they must be listed with path+SHA and a stated reason for not crediting them. The 'not implemented' entries for the affected clauses are wrong as written.",
|
||||
"acceptance_ids": [
|
||||
"P19-03"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"findings": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"severity": "medium",
|
||||
"message": "Existing-support audit is incomplete and inconsistent. coassignment_attack, zero_break, love_actions (shield recovery) and threshold_route_loss are recorded as implementation \"not implemented\", but frozen source at anchor 1b07b87 has live legacy mechanisms for them: scripts/relationship/relationship_service.gd apply_shield_attack (264–312, reports shield_broken), restore_shield (246–261), request_route_lock/confirm_route_lock (315–355); autoload/simulation_runtime.gd registers request_route_lock/confirm_route_lock as commands (342–343) and calls apply_shield_attack (6850); scripts/events/event_service.gd applies them as event effects (1039, 1047); scripts/relationship/placement_risk_preview_service.gd computes heroine/rival contact and _shield_attack_candidates (536, 619). Meanwhile a legacy main.gd label constant (89–101) is credited as 'partial'. Fix: record these legacy mechanisms per clause with exact path+SHA+lines at the anchor. Classify each as partial/legacy-not-original (or keep missing for the original model) with an explicit reason, e.g. P18-01 forbids one-to-one conversion and the numbers/daily limits are not approved originals. Keep owners and gaps unchanged. Regenerate the MD and add a self-test that rejects dropping this evidence."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"severity": "low",
|
||||
"message": "Most data-level negative tests (wrong character/route, owner, status, stale text) mutate the document and compare it to a canonical built by the same expected() function. They only prove equality with hard-coded facts, not that those facts are correct. Source/baseline/blob/pin corruption tests are real. Consider adding independent assertions, e.g. that every 'missing' item's semantic claim is cross-checked against grep-able absence or presence in the cited source files, so mislabeled statuses like the one above are caught."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"severity": "low",
|
||||
"message": "interruption_cancellation maps only §6.5 departure (line 135). The route-terminating clauses — duel loss 'ヒロインを即座に強奪' (153) and '純愛ルート完全消失' (148) — and legacy route_lock irreversibility are not cross-referenced as interruption/cancellation authorities. The character-specific gap covers it, but the common enumeration of interruption handling required by the original work is thin."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"severity": "low",
|
||||
"message": "The checker's SPEC_HASH (263a01b9…) is the TASK_SPEC.json file-byte hash. It differs from the contract spec_sha256 (3af3d9b9…), presumably because the contract hashes a different serialization. The runner pass confirms the file is unchanged from base, but the report should say which representation each hash covers."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user