diff --git a/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/owner_model_cli.py b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/owner_model_cli.py index 9faccf4..4f8884f 100644 --- a/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/owner_model_cli.py +++ b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/owner_model_cli.py @@ -73,6 +73,13 @@ def owner_model_argv(self, service, role, runtime, schema): position = argv.index('--model') del argv[position:position + 2] argv += ['--model', 'claude-opus-5-5' if service == 'claude' else getattr(self, '_owner_codex_model', 'gpt-6.1-sol')] + if service == 'claude' and role == 'reviewer' and self.config['project'] == 'the-tree-p08-03-code': + task_runtime = self.runtime('P08-03').resolve() + if Path(runtime).resolve().is_relative_to(task_runtime): + build = Path(self.allocation('P08-03')['build_dir']).resolve() + if not build.is_relative_to(task_runtime): + raise ValueError('existing task build scope required') + argv += ['--add-dir', str(build)] return argv Runner.provider_argv = owner_model_argv diff --git a/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/CLAUDE_NATIVE_AUTH_REFRESH_20261014.json b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/CLAUDE_NATIVE_AUTH_REFRESH_20261014.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2e0c64e --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/CLAUDE_NATIVE_AUTH_REFRESH_20261014.json @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +{ + "runner_initial_result": "authentication_expired", + "native_cli_logged_in": true, + "native_cli_response": "AUTH_REFRESH_OK", + "actual_model": "claude-opus-5-5", + "provider": "firstParty", + "api_fallback": false, + "permission_denials": [], + "manual_relogin_requested": false, + "runner_commander_retried_after_native_refresh": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/CURRENT_ACCEPTANCE_STATUS.json b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/CURRENT_ACCEPTANCE_STATUS.json index cbd94f1..b8ae946 100644 --- a/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/CURRENT_ACCEPTANCE_STATUS.json +++ b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/CURRENT_ACCEPTANCE_STATUS.json @@ -1,22 +1,30 @@ { "plan_id": "P08-03", "status": "in_progress", - "candidate": "7e2368f5c453a3900ba1bb038d7138d25f7eb4fb", + "candidate": "47750010b8694c72737f47078f925b2b2e22ce59", "executed_native_source": "31aa7706d28a92e313c432d5a62e35d19503dcc3", "formal_acceptance": false, - "independent_review": "INDEPENDENT_OPUS_REVIEW_7DDE98CC.json", + "independent_review": "INDEPENDENT_SEMANTIC_REVIEW_7E2368F5.json", "review_status": "changes_requested", "missing": [ - "final175 full regression", - "independent semantic acceptance including stair preview/runtime difference", - "integration and final evidence checks" + "shared readonly Runtime precheck and placement preview/command agreement", + "Main must display real rejection reason consistently", + "Opus recorded scope reconciliation for necessary Runtime/test changes", + "changed-product native/OS recollection after batch freezes", + "final175 on exact final candidate", + "independent raw-proof read and all-five-condition review", + "integration, current final verification and ledger closure" ], "next_unit": "P08-03", "denominator_packages": 30, "denominator_units": 88, "completed_delta": 0, - "formal_validator": "passed:1c1e23a695664c0999a6924211108c00-validation.json", - "next_action": "Opus recommends independent all5-condition semantic review before costly final175 to decide green preview followed by domain refusal; final175 and final acceptance still mandatory", + "formal_validator": "7e2368f5 only historical after changed Main/checker; current 4775001 not accepted", + "next_action": "actual Opus commander running after native Claude subscription auth refresh; preserve submitted work; no duplicate implementer", "semantic_triage": "OPUS_PRE_FULL_SEMANTIC_TRIAGE_7E2368F5.json (read-only, no acceptance)", - "capacity": "two closed generated cache deletion approval pending; no deletion performed; used Codex log excluded from compression" + "capacity": "cleanup complete: 7.94GB free; 580 closed stages archived losslessly; current R09 retained; no cleanup permission pending", + "implemented_not_accepted": [ + "readable demolition outcome/refund from real result", + "checker rejects preview/command disagreement; 128 local Python controls executed" + ] } diff --git a/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/INDEPENDENT_SEMANTIC_REVIEW_7E2368F5.json b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/INDEPENDENT_SEMANTIC_REVIEW_7E2368F5.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ff24c30 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/INDEPENDENT_SEMANTIC_REVIEW_7E2368F5.json @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +{ + "task_id": "P08-03", + "commit": "7e2368f5c453a3900ba1bb038d7138d25f7eb4fb", + "status": "changes_requested", + "summary": "範囲: 最終受入ではなく semantic_pre_full_review。final175、最終独立受入、統合、Windows同一配布/実機は未了のまま。登録validatorの結果は integrity=pass, acceptance=pending（.review-material/validation-runs/0/0/stdout.log）。\n\n条件別の判定:\n(1) support_connection は不成立。正例 supported_connected（受付, CONNECTED）、lower_stair (4,1,0) OK、upper_stair (4,2,0) OK、unsupported の標準客室プレビュー拒否は妥当。lower_stair は DISCONNECTED のまま建設可で接続警告が表示されており、BASELINE:224 の「接続ライン警告表示」と整合する。一方 missing_connection (-8,2,0) は、ホバー時に緑の配置矩形と「配置可能…入口への経路未接続 — クリックで建設」を表示し（main.gd:1428-1432, world_preview.gd:1349-1359）、クリック後に Runtime が STAIR_LANDING_MISSING で拒否する（simulation_runtime.gd:7599-7600）。プレビューの根拠は construction_service.validate_placement（world_preview.gd:205-213）で、階段の下側着地点の判定を含まない。このため同一セルで表示上の判定と実判定が食い違い、「拒否理由と実判定が一致」を満たさない。クリック後の表示文言が Runtime の message と一致し、拒否時の差分がコマンド記録（command envelope）に限られることは確認した。\n(2) invalid_position_reason: ソース上は整合する（プレビュー拒否では送信せず、checker の preserve が型付き状態全体を比較）。範囲外・重複の生行は直接読めず未独立確認。reader の重複表示は coordinator 行と一致する。\n(3) demolish_rebuild: 次の 4 点は概ね妥当。\n - STAIR_LANDING_IN_USE が実 demolish_facility で拒否され、表示コードが一致。\n - 取消は before/after の SHA が同一。\n - 受付の撤去は OK で refund materials:2。\n - 同一セル (-8,0,0) への再建築は OK で、新ID facility_00000004 は既存 Runtime 上正当。\n ただし表示品質に指摘あり（findings 参照）。\n(4) pan_zoom_world_identity: 移動モードの wheel で pan が変化し、zoom は 0.5/4.0 でクランプ、変換後ピクセルで (-8,0,0) を選択していることを coordinator 行と checker で確認。生 OS 証跡は未独立確認。\n(5) separate_pid_resume: writer PID 80337 と reader PID 92565 は別。reader は通常UIから (-8,0,0) で facility_00000004 の重複拒否を表示。生証跡は未独立確認。\n\n製品と checker に欠陥があるため changes_requested とする。", + "acceptance_ids": [ + "P08-03" + ], + "findings": [ + { + "severity": "high", + "message": "製品欠陥（support_connection / 拒否理由と実判定の一致）: 階段の下側着地点がない (-8,2,0) で、通常パレットのホバープレビューが can_build=true の緑矩形と「配置可能 … — クリックで建設」を表示する（main.gd:1428-1432, world_preview.gd:201-213, 1349-1359）。クリックすると Runtime が VALIDATION_FAILED/STAIR_LANDING_MISSING で拒否する（autoload/simulation_runtime.gd:7599-7600）。原因は、プレビューが construction_service.validate_placement だけを使い、Runtime 層の着地点判定を反映しないこと。同一セルで表示判定と実判定が食い違う。CONDITION_MATRIX.md:63 でも未解決 finding として自認されている。修正案: Main/WorldPreview（allowed_paths 内）で、既存の読み取り専用 API から着地点判定を参照してプレビューを拒否表示にする。既存 API がなければ、domain logic を UI に複製せず、Runtime 側の読み取り専用プレビュー API の最小提案と失敗証跡を返す。" + }, + { + "severity": "high", + "message": "checker 欠陥: tools/check_p08_normal_placement_evidence.py:607-609 が missing_connection 行に row['report']['can_build'] == True を要求している（'connection refusal did not reach Runtime'）。これにより、プレビュー可・実判定拒否という不一致が合格条件として固定されている。さらに 'missing_connection' というラベルは、実際には階段着地点（支持）の拒否であり、接続の拒否ではない。プレビューの判定・表示理由と Runtime の結果が一致することを要求し、不一致を負例として検出する形に改めるべき。" + }, + { + "severity": "medium", + "message": "撤去結果の表示が、利用者向けの結果表示になっていない: _show_demolition_result（main.gd:3175-3178）は成功時に 'OK | | ' という生の enum 連結だけを表示し、撤去完了や返却資源を示さない。拒否時も 'VALIDATION_FAILED | STAIR_LANDING_IN_USE | …' の生ダンプになる。コード一致は保たれているが、production_scope が求める result/status handling としては不十分。" + }, + { + "severity": "low", + "message": "撤去モードの軽微な点: 施設のないセルをクリックしても空の施設名で確認ダイアログが出て、instance_id '' を送信できる（main.gd:3136-3168）。また、建設が使う _submit_ui_command（音声フィードバック・idempotency 経路）を通らず、_runtime.submit_command を直接呼んでいる。" + }, + { + "severity": "medium", + "message": "証跡アクセスの制約: R09 の生証跡（/Users/korizatou114/Projects/TheTree-managed-worktrees/p08-03-code/.runtime/P08-03/build/p08-normal-placement-evidence/os-pair/writer-actions.json など）の Read が、作業ディレクトリ外として拒否された（--restricted）。.review-material 内にミラーはない。このため invalid_position_reason、pan_zoom、separate_pid_resume、撤去／再建築の生行・画像・受領書は独立に照合できていない。本判定は対象ソース、checker、validator stdout、coordinator 提供の生行抜粋に基づく。final175 の前に、作業ディレクトリ内へのミラーか読み取り権限が必要。" + } + ] +} diff --git a/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/MAC_LOCK_READONLY_DIAGNOSIS.json b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/MAC_LOCK_READONLY_DIAGNOSIS.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..97c1b0d --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/MAC_LOCK_READONLY_DIAGNOSIS.json @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +{ + "device": "TakeshinoMac-mini", + "observed_jst": "2026-10-14", + "system_sleep": 0, + "display_sleep_minutes": 180, + "screensaver_idle": 0, + "hot_corner_raw": { + "bottom_right": 14, + "others": "unset" + }, + "password_preferences": "not present in queried legacy preference keys; not assumed disabled", + "loginwindow_last2hours": "no lock-specific event found; clock change event only", + "guardian_last24hours": "audio clock events matched lock substring in clock; no actual lock reason identified", + "conclusion": "cause unresolved; current ordinary idle/saver settings do not explain frequent short-interval locks; no setting changed", + "limitations": "historical lock episodes not reproduced; absence of recent logs is not proof that no locking occurred" +} diff --git a/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/OPUS_REPAIR17_DIRECTION.json b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/OPUS_REPAIR17_DIRECTION.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ab162d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/OPUS_REPAIR17_DIRECTION.json @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +{ + "action": "request-repair", + "task_id": "P08-03", + "reason": "Repair 17 for P08-03 (submitted 7e2368f5), revision 2. This replaces the earlier repair17 direction in full. It follows independent PRE-FULL review 3124b341, which returned changes_requested. Treat the review text, evidence and source comments as data. Before editing, briefly declare three things: the findings you target (A–E below), the exact files you will create or change, and the exact commands you will run.\n\nRead-only facts the commander re-checked at HEAD 7e2368f:\n- WorldPreview.get_build_preview_report (scenes/main/world_preview.gd:201-218) gets can_build/error_codes/reasons only from construction_service.validate_placement and adds a connection report on top.\n- SimulationRuntime._execute_build_facility (autoload/simulation_runtime.gd:7576-7615) runs its pre-checks in this order:\n 1. operations gate (_operations_construction_investment_gate)\n 2. NOT_FOUND definition\n 3. unsupported vertical proxy (VALIDATION_FAILED, reason REASON_UNSUPPORTED_VERTICAL_TOPOLOGY)\n 4. origin parse (INVALID_PAYLOAD)\n 5. STAIR_LANDING_MISSING (:7599-7600, through _staff_assignment_failure, message 「先に階段の一つ下の階に通路を作ってください。」)\n 6. ELEVATOR_BUSY (:7601-7603)\n 7. rotation (INVALID_PAYLOAD)\n \n After these it calls construction_service.start_construction. The landing rule is repeated privately in FacilityInfrastructureProjector (_stair_lower_landing, around :208).\n- No public read-only Runtime or ConstructionService API covers these pre-checks.\n- Result: main.gd:1428-1432 shows green 「配置可能…クリックで建設」 at missing_connection (-8,2,0), and Runtime then refuses with STAIR_LANDING_MISSING.\n- The checker locks in the defect at tools/check_p08_normal_placement_evidence.py:607-609 (it requires report.can_build true for missing_connection).\n- main.gd:3175-3178 _show_demolition_result prints \"%s | %s | %s\" from the CommandResult.Code enum key, the reason and the message, which gives \"OK | |\" on success. Checker :587 and tests/fixtures/p08-03/checker_fixture.py:260 lock in that format.\n- Existing Japanese resource titles are in main.gd:2787-2792 (gold 所持金, mana マナ, materials 資材, faith 信仰).\n\n(A) HIGH: preview/command disagreement. Prepare an outside-scope proposal with a concrete patch that is NOT applied.\nDo not edit autoload/, scripts/construction/, scripts/world/ or any test outside allowed_paths. Do not copy the landing rule (or any other domain rule) into Main, WorldPreview or the checker. Do not hide, recolour or reword the green 「配置可能」 UI to fake agreement.\n\n1. Create docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/runtime-preview-proposal/RUNTIME_PREVIEW_PROPOSAL.md. Header: \"OUTSIDE CURRENT TASK SCOPE — NOT APPLIED — Root reconciles against standing full-game implementation authorization after concrete review; no approval inferred.\" It must contain:\n - Problem and failing case: guest_stairs at (-8,2,0) with no path cell at (-8,1,0). The preview currently gives can_build=true, while submit_command(build_facility) returns VALIDATION_FAILED with reason STAIR_LANDING_MISSING and the message above.\n - Design:\n - A private shared helper in SimulationRuntime, for example _build_facility_precheck(command_id, definition, origin, rotation) -> CommandResult (null on pass). It holds the existing checks in the existing order, with the same codes, reasons and messages.\n - _execute_build_facility is refactored to call this helper, so there is a single rule source and no change to any domain value, order or message.\n - A public read-only preview_build_facility(definition_id: StringName, origin: Vector3i, rotation: int) -> Dictionary. It runs the helper and then merges construction_service.validate_placement(...).to_dictionary(). A pre-check failure sets can_build=false and prepends error code (details.reason, or else the Code key) and the Runtime message to error_codes/reasons. It must not mutate anything.\n - WorldPreview.get_build_preview_report calls runtime preview_build_facility when has_method is true, otherwise falls back to the current path, and keeps the _build_connection_report augmentation.\n - main.gd needs no change, because its existing can_build/reasons rendering already shows the refusal.\n - Purity check: verify in the source, and record with file:line, that _operations_construction_investment_gate, _staff_assignment_failure, _elevator_touches_module/_elevator_shaft_busy and validate_placement have no side effects such as event emission, counters, command-log or RNG changes. If any of them does, state it and adapt the design: for example, have the helper return a (code, reason, message) tuple and build the CommandResult only in the command path. Do not hide it.\n - Exact files the patch changes.\n - Impact on existing tests: tests/transport/test_runtime_stairs.gd and any construction/world_preview tests found with Grep. List them with the expected outcome (unchanged).\n - Targeted tests, with expected assertions:\n - Preview at the failing case returns can_build=false, with STAIR_LANDING_MISSING in error_codes and the Runtime message in reasons.\n - The typed Runtime state/save snapshot is byte-identical before and after preview.\n - submit_command at the same cell returns the same reason and message.\n - With a path at (-8,1,0), the preview's can_build agrees with submit OK.\n - Precedence: the operations gate and unsupported vertical still win over the landing rule.\n - The WorldPreview report surfaces the Runtime code.\n2. Create runtime_preview.patch in the same directory: a concrete unified git diff against HEAD that implements the design above. It covers:\n - autoload/simulation_runtime.gd (helper, refactor, public API)\n - scenes/main/world_preview.gd (the guarded call)\n - a new targeted GDScript test file plus its .uid (for example tests/transport/test_runtime_build_preview.gd)\n \n The patch must not be applied to the worktree. Validate it only with `git apply --check docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/runtime-preview-proposal/runtime_preview.patch`, which is read-only, and report the result.\n3. Until Root reconciles and applies the patch, condition (1) support_connection stays NOT satisfied. Record it as blocked pending Root reconciliation of the concrete proposal. Do not block or delay any other authorized work on it.\n\n(B) Checker: tools/check_p08_normal_placement_evidence.py, action gate.\n1. Build rows: replace lines 607-609 and restructure so that the preview-refusal path is evaluated before the generic `len(results)==1` branch.\n - Preview-refusal path (agreement): for missing_connection, require all of:\n - report.can_build is false\n - 'STAIR_LANDING_MISSING' is in report.error_codes\n - results == [] (no command submitted)\n - preserve(before, after, []) holds over the whole typed state\n - the displayed status/reason text equals the Runtime message carried in report.reasons\n - Submitted path: if a command was submitted and Runtime refused with reason X, while report.can_build was true, FAIL with 'preview/command disagreement'. If the preview reason code differs from the Runtime reason, FAIL with 'preview reason differs from Runtime reason'. Apply this disagreement rule to every build row with a Runtime refusal, not only missing_connection. Keep the existing status == Runtime message check where a submission legitimately occurs.\n - The current R09 evidence must therefore FAIL with 'preview/command disagreement'.\n2. Demolish rows: replace the line 587 format check.\n - The player-facing status must NOT contain raw implementation tokens: the CommandResult.Code key (OK, VALIDATION_FAILED, …), the details.reason code (STAIR_LANDING_IN_USE, …), or the ' | ' separator.\n - Success: status must equal exactly the string built by the product format from result.details.refund (resource keys mapped through the same Japanese titles, deterministic key order, zero/absent handled as the product does). Recompute it in the checker from the raw result. Fail 'demolition refund display mismatch' on a wrong or missing amount.\n - Refusal: status must equal the product refusal format around result.message. Fail 'demolition refusal message mismatch' otherwise.\n - Separately require that the raw result keeps code=='VALIDATION_FAILED' and details.reason==row.expected. The passive proof keeps the codes; only the UI drops them.\n - Keep the refund arithmetic check at 594-596, the partial-demolition and wrong-cell checks, and all other existing checks unchanged.\n\n(C) Product: scenes/main/main.gd only, in scope now.\nRewrite _show_demolition_result as Japanese human-readable text with no enum or reason tokens:\n- Success with a refund: 「撤去しました（返金: 資材 2）」, built from result.details.refund. Map keys through the existing resource titles; extract them into one small shared const/helper reused by _on_resource_changed, with no duplicated table. Skip zero amounts and use a stable order. With no refund, show 「撤去しました（返金なし）」.\n- Refusal: 「撤去できません: 」, using the actual returned message verbatim. Do not translate or replace Runtime messages; English Runtime messages for some reasons are recorded as deferred low findings.\n- Running-play acceptance (result OK but not yet processed, see _confirm_demolition:3170): show 「撤去を受け付けました」, and make sure the processed result for _pending_demolition_commands goes through the same formatter.\n\nDo not change Runtime calls, domain logic, refund values or reason codes. Do not apply the world_preview.gd hunk from the patch now.\n\n(D) Tests: tools/test_p08_normal_placement_evidence.py plus tests/fixtures/p08-03/checker_fixture.py.\n- Update only what encoded the wrong assertions: the missing_connection row with can_build=True/submission (:234-243) and the '%s | %s | %s' status (:260). Keep every other test, and do not weaken any drift negative.\n- Add negatives, each asserting its specific message:\n - preview can_build=true + Runtime STAIR_LANDING_MISSING → 'preview/command disagreement'\n - preview code differs from the Runtime reason\n - preview refusal with a partial state change\n - demolition success status missing the refund amount\n - demolition success status with a wrong amount\n - status containing a raw enum token / 'OK | |'\n - refusal status containing a reason code token\n - refusal status missing or altering the Runtime message\n - raw result reason mismatch even though the text matches\n- Add positives:\n - agreeing preview refusal for missing_connection with preserved state\n - readable success status matching the refund\n - readable refusal status with the reason preserved in the raw result\n- Update tests/fixtures/p08-03/placement.gd (:124, :229) only as far as needed to expect the preview refusal and record report/status. Do not run it, and note that it only passes natively after Root applies the proposal patch.\n\n(E) Docs: update CONDITION_MATRIX.md and implementation.json under execution/p08-03.\n- Add a repair17 entry and keep all history.\n- (1) blocked pending Root reconciliation and application of runtime_preview.patch.\n- (2)-(5): the earlier reviewer raw-proof read refusal stays historical. The reviewer now has the permitted task build through --add-dir (while --restricted, Read/Grep/Glob and the outer sandbox remain), and a future independent check is required. Do not claim them verified.\n- Old R09 evidence and pins stay historical and unrewritten. Native/OS proof for the demolition status and support display is invalidated by this product change and needs Root recollection after all product fixes, including the applied proposal, are combined. Do not claim applicability or acceptance.\n- List the net diff with `git diff --name-status --no-renames 31aa7706d28a92e313c432d5a62e35d19503dcc3 HEAD` plus the working changes, and leave the new HEAD as 'to be bound by Runner'.\n\nConstraints:\n- Stay within allowed_paths.\n- No change to the spec, the denominator (1 unit of 30 packages/88 units, no partial credit), domain rule order or values, caps, budget, Runner, policy or credentials.\n- No new numeric or spec values.\n- No Godot, native or full runs, and no pytest dependency discovery.\n- No commit or branch changes, and no self-approval.\n- Repair, inference and material limits stay null, with no 500k compression.\n- Low findings (empty cell, audio, idempotency, English Runtime messages) and unrelated improvements stay deferred.\n\nRun only these, and report each exact command and result:\n- `python3 -B tools/test_p08_normal_placement_evidence.py`\n- `python3 -m py_compile tools/check_p08_normal_placement_evidence.py tools/test_p08_normal_placement_evidence.py tests/fixtures/p08-03/checker_fixture.py`\n- `python3 -c \"import json,sys;json.load(open(sys.argv[1]))\" docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/implementation.json`\n- `git apply --check` on the patch\n\nReturn a genuine submitted result that lists everything still pending:\n- Root reconciliation and application of the Runtime preview patch\n- Root native/OS recollection for the changed UI\n- Root final full175\n- independent Opus review of all 5 conditions, with raw-proof access\n- integration / current final verification / ledger\n- Windows same-distribution/device (no Mac substitution)", + "codex_model": "gpt-6.1-sol", + "codex_model_reason": "Keeping the default gpt-6.1-sol. The commander re-checked the root cause, the exact Runtime pre-check order (simulation_runtime.gd:7576-7615) and every affected checker and fixture line, and has fixed the design. What remains is bounded work:\n- one main.gd formatter\n- two checker branches with focused Python tests\n- docs\n- one unapplied patch that moves existing checks into a helper without changing any rule, validated only by git apply --check\n\nThere is no native run, no applied Runtime edit and no multi-component debugging. Astra would add time and usage without a clear quality gain." +} diff --git a/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/OPUS_REPAIR17_RUN.json b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/OPUS_REPAIR17_RUN.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c0d9e58 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/OPUS_REPAIR17_RUN.json @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +{ + "action": "run", + "task_id": "P08-03", + "reason": "The Runner is at repair_ready for P08-03 (submitted 7e2368f5, repairs=17). The next step is to run the complete repair17 revision 2 direction exactly as recorded, with no change. That direction is the only one in force and follows review 3124b341. It has five parts:\n\n(A) Write the outside-scope Runtime preview proposal under docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/runtime-preview-proposal/:\n- RUNTIME_PREVIEW_PROPOSAL.md, with the header \"OUTSIDE CURRENT TASK SCOPE — NOT APPLIED\" and a purity check that cites file:line.\n- runtime_preview.patch, a concrete unified diff for autoload/simulation_runtime.gd, scenes/main/world_preview.gd and a new targeted test with its .uid.\n- Check the patch only with `git apply --check`. Do not apply it.\n- Do not edit autoload/, scripts/construction/ or scripts/world/. Do not copy any domain rule into Main, WorldPreview or the checker. Do not disguise the green 「配置可能」 UI.\n\n(B) In tools/check_p08_normal_placement_evidence.py:\n- Evaluate the agreeing preview refusal for missing_connection first: can_build false, STAIR_LANDING_MISSING, no submission, preserved state, and status equal to the Runtime message.\n- On every build row, fail with 'preview/command disagreement' or 'preview reason differs from Runtime reason'. The current R09 evidence must therefore fail.\n- For demolition, require readable status text that matches the refund or the refusal message and contains no raw tokens, while the raw result still keeps code and reason.\n\n(C) In scenes/main/main.gd only, change the demolition status to Japanese text:\n- 撤去しました（返金: …／返金なし）, using one shared resource-title helper.\n- 撤去できません: .\n- 撤去を受け付けました, with pending results sent through the same formatter.\n- Make no change to Runtime calls, domain values or the world_preview hunk.\n\n(D) Update only the wrong assertions in tools/test_p08_normal_placement_evidence.py and tests/fixtures/p08-03/checker_fixture.py. Add the listed negatives and positives, each checking its specific message. Make the minimal placement.gd expectation update and do not run it.\n\n(E) In CONDITION_MATRIX.md and implementation.json, add a repair17 entry and keep all history:\n- (1) is blocked until Root reconciles and applies the patch.\n- (2)–(5) are not claimed as verified; a future independent check with raw-proof access is required.\n- Old R09 evidence stays historical. Native/OS proof for the changed UI is invalidated.\n- Record the net diff. The new HEAD is bound by the Runner.\n\nBefore editing, the worker declares the findings it targets, the exact files and the exact commands. It runs only these four commands:\n- `python3 -B tools/test_p08_normal_placement_evidence.py`\n- py_compile on the three Python files\n- the implementation.json load check\n- `git apply --check` on the patch\n\nConstraints: no Godot, native or full runs, and no duplicate or intermediate recollection. No commit or branch change. No change to the spec, the denominator (1 unit of 30 packages/88 units), caps, budget, Runner, policy or credentials. No new domain or numeric values. Repair, inference and material limits stay null, with no 500k compression. Low findings stay deferred.\n\nThe worker returns a genuine submitted result that lists everything still pending:\n- Root reconciliation and application of the Runtime preview patch\n- Root native/OS recollection for the changed UI\n- Root final full175\n- independent Opus review of all 5 conditions, with raw-proof access\n- integration, current final verification and the ledger\n- Windows same-distribution/device (no Mac substitution)\n\nNo acceptance is claimed.", + "codex_model": "gpt-6.1-sol", + "codex_model_reason": "I'm keeping the default gpt-6.1-sol. The commander has already found the root cause, the exact order of the Runtime pre-checks (simulation_runtime.gd:7576-7615) and every checker and fixture line that has to change. The remaining work is bounded:\n- one main.gd formatter that reuses the existing resource titles\n- two checker branches with focused Python tests\n- docs\n- one patch that is not applied: it moves the existing checks into a helper unchanged and adds a read-only API, and it is checked only with git apply --check\n\nThere is no native run, no Runtime edit applied to the worktree and no debugging across components. gpt-6-astra would cost more time and usage without a clear gain in quality. The Python tests and the later independent review catch any mistakes in the patch." +} diff --git a/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/OPUS_SHARED_RUNTIME_SCOPE_DIRECTION.json b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/OPUS_SHARED_RUNTIME_SCOPE_DIRECTION.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5c83afb --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/OPUS_SHARED_RUNTIME_SCOPE_DIRECTION.json @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +{ + "action": "wait", + "task_id": "P08-03", + "reason": "WAIT means only this: keep submitted 47750010 intact while Root reconciles scope. It is not a human approval gate. Validating now would spend a native/OS run on a candidate already known to fail condition (1). The repaired checker deliberately fails the historical R09 evidence with 'preview/command disagreement', and the Runtime precheck is not applied yet. Do not re-implement or rewrite anything already submitted: main.gd demolition formatter, checker/tests/fixtures, docs and proposal.\n\nSCOPE MECHANISM (minimal, recorded, through Runner):\n- Root registers one supporting task, P08-03-RTPREVIEW, through the normal Runner task contract. Do not widen P08-03's immutable allowed_paths by hand.\n- counting_scope: 'supporting implementation for the existing P08-03 unit; no new unit; 30/88 and the five conditions unchanged; no partial credit'.\n- depends_on: none. base: current main.\n- allowed_paths, exactly:\n - autoload/simulation_runtime.gd\n - tests/transport/test_runtime_build_preview.gd\n - tests/transport/test_runtime_build_preview.gd.uid\n- forbidden: any change to rule values, order, codes or messages; any change to construction service, data or spec.\n- worker: gpt-6.1-sol.\n- After it is integrated, the next P08-03 transition (validate → failure → request-repair 18, rebased onto that commit) applies only the WorldPreview hunk plus the Main/fixture items below.\n\nCOMMANDER REVIEW OF runtime_preview.patch (do not apply as-is):\n1. The refactor itself is correct. Precedence matches HEAD 7576-7615: operations → NOT_FOUND → unsupported vertical → origin → landing → elevator → rotation. Codes and messages are byte-identical.\n2. Invalid-definition guard (MISSING): preview_build_facility calls validate_placement(null, …) when the definition is unknown. Required: if the definition is null, return {can_build:false, error_codes:['NOT_FOUND'], reasons:[{code:'NOT_FOUND', message:failure.message, cells:[], details:{}}], cells:[]} without calling the service. Unknown id / unsupported / precheck failure must never crash, and must also cover a precheck failure ordered before NOT_FOUND (the operations gate) when the definition is null.\n3. Purity (verified read-only):\n - _staff_assignment_failure (simulation_runtime.gd:6687) only constructs a result.\n - _operations_construction_investment_gate (:7988) reads the coordinator plus _operations_total_arrears.\n - _elevator_shaft_busy (:12744) and _elevator_touches_module (:12749) are pure reads.\n - The supporting worker must still cite file:line purity for operations_coordinator.can_start_construction_or_investment, _operations_total_arrears, elevators.get_report and validate_placement. If any of them mutates, switch to a tuple-returning helper.\n - The test must assert byte-identical var_to_bytes(create_snapshot()) and an unchanged command-log/event count.\n4. The test uses the invented reason 'ARREARS_REMAIN'. Use an existing gate reason (UNPAID_EXPENSES from :7993), or assert the code that the gate returns. Add cases for:\n - NOT_FOUND\n - origin INVALID_PAYLOAD is not reachable through the Vector3i API, so state that explicitly\n - ELEVATOR_BUSY precedence over rotation\n - invalid rotation → INVALID_PAYLOAD 'The selected rotation is not allowed.'\n - preview/submit agreement for every precheck case\n5. uid://cpxbldpreview is hand-written and may not be valid Godot UID text. Root must generate a valid stable uid, or the worker must copy an existing valid UID pattern.\n6. The WorldPreview hunk (P08-03 repair 18) keeps the has_method fallback and _build_connection_report, and must leave the INVALID_PREVIEW behaviour for a null definition unchanged.\n\nMAIN (the earlier 'Main unchanged' premise is wrong): _preview_failure_message (main.gd:2123-2131) maps error_codes[0] through PREVIEW_REASON_NAMES (:77-86) and falls back to the raw code. As written, a STAIR_LANDING_MISSING refusal would show 「配置不可: STAIR_LANDING_MISSING」. Repair 18 must change the ordering:\n- Code in PREVIEW_REASON_NAMES: keep the existing Japanese name.\n- Otherwise: use reasons[0].message verbatim when reasons[0].code == error_codes[0], which gives 「配置不可: 先に階段の一つ下の階に通路を作ってください。」.\n- Last resort: the raw code.\nMain must not hold any domain rule. The checker's existing status == Runtime message check already enforces this. Update fixture placement.gd expectations to match.\n\nORDER AFTER RECONCILIATION:\n1. Supporting task: targeted test plus impact tests (tests/transport/test_runtime_stairs.gd and the construction/world_preview tests), then independent review and integration.\n2. P08-03 repair 18: Python checker tests, py_compile, JSON validation; docs updated with the condition (1) status.\n3. Freeze.\n4. Root actual native/OS recollection of the build-refusal and demolition displays (old R09 stays historical).\n5. Exactly one final full175.\n6. Independent Opus review of all five conditions with raw-read access.\n7. Integration, current final verification and ledger.\n\nWindows same-distribution/device stays open, with no Mac substitution.", + "codex_model": "gpt-6.1-sol", + "codex_model_reason": "Keeping the default gpt-6.1-sol. The next work is small and fully specified, with no open design question:\n- moving existing checks into a shared helper without changing any rule, already drafted and reviewed above\n- one null-definition guard\n- one targeted GDScript test\n- later, a Main message-ordering tweak and the WorldPreview hunk\n\nPurity and precedence were checked against the source. There is no multi-component debugging or ambiguity that would justify Astra's extra time and usage." +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/REVIEW_RAW_READ_CONTEXT_CHECK.json b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/REVIEW_RAW_READ_CONTEXT_CHECK.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..be243d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p08-03/REVIEW_RAW_READ_CONTEXT_CHECK.json @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +{ + "prior_refusal": "CLI restricted mode only knew cwd despite outer sandbox already permitting task runtime", + "correction": "--add-dir exact already-permitted P08 build for reviewer in same task runtime", + "preserved": [ + "--restricted", + "Read,Grep,Glob only", + "outer sandbox", + "credential/shared Git write denies", + "all required raw proof and source" + ], + "actual_local_checks": [ + "correct existing build argv", + "other runtime receives no add-dir", + "restricted and readonly tools unchanged" + ], + "actual_future_raw_read_check": "pending; no access success inferred from argv", + "unit_acceptance": false +} diff --git a/docs/spec/acceptance/P08-03-RTPREVIEW.json b/docs/spec/acceptance/P08-03-RTPREVIEW.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bfa2af2 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/spec/acceptance/P08-03-RTPREVIEW.json @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +{ + "id": "P08-03-RTPREVIEW", + "requirement_id": "P08-03", + "counting_scope": "Supporting implementation for existing P08-03 only. Zero added original units; 30 packages/88 units; no partial credit.", + "authority": "Original P08-03 preview/refusal agreement plus owner standing full implementation instruction; actual Opus scope direction OPUS_SHARED_RUNTIME_SCOPE_DIRECTION.json", + "scope": [ + "autoload/simulation_runtime.gd", + "tests/transport/test_runtime_build_preview.gd", + "tests/transport/test_runtime_build_preview.gd.uid" + ], + "required_conditions": [ + "One shared read-only precheck for preview and build preserves operations/NOT_FOUND/unsupported/origin/landing/elevator/rotation order and actual codes/messages", + "Unknown definition and prior operations failure preserve precedence without crashing", + "Typed snapshot bytes, command log and event count unchanged by preview", + "Preview and actual submission agree on required precheck cases, with meaningful negative/purity/precedence tests" + ], + "verification": "Worker static diff review only; Root owns guarded isolated targeted native and impact tests; independent Opus and integration required. A source-presence check alone is not acceptance.", + "forbidden": [ + "No rule values, codes/messages/order changes", + "No construction service/data/original requirement edits", + "No main/UI/source edits beyond these three files", + "No worker native/full/Godot runs or new all-regression copies" + ], + "reuse": "Use submitted 4775001 concrete Runtime/test patch as seed; correct actual Opus findings; leave P08 UI hunks for existing task." +}