30 lines
7.2 KiB
JSON
30 lines
7.2 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"candidate": "9641ed52def2ff8e5b0222449a4a83a1191e1d37",
|
||
"scope": "Limited new preservation/full-restored-snapshot scenario evidence review; not formal whole-unit acceptance",
|
||
"result": {
|
||
"status": "passed",
|
||
"summary": "Limited pass for one native macOS run on 9641ed5: a producer (PID 39701) and a separate consumer (PID 40866). The new data fixes the blocking ALL4 gap from the previous review. Both root captures are now supplied in full. They hash all four files in saves/manual_ui and get identical maps: journal.log 35 B 1ba101ad…, world.bin 12258 B da65a181…, manifest.json 650 B 62d801bb…, thumbnail.png 30080 B 17b547b7…. Each capture lists exactly these four files, so the directory had no extra files at either time. The capture times fit the engine's own records. The slot manifest says it was created at 06:48:59 UTC, which matches the quick save at tick 103791. The dialog's default label shows 15:49:43 JST (06:49:43 UTC), which matches tick 148216. From that, the named save at tick 175078 works out to about 06:50:10 UTC. The before capture was created at 06:49:14, after the quick save and before the dialog opened. The after capture was created at 06:50:27, after the named save finished. The named save wrote to the new path manual_ui_6789…, and the live re-hash at 06:58:05 still matches all four files. The JSON files differ in size (1472 vs 762 bytes) only because the before file also embeds the manifest. A sanity check also holds: the 35-byte journal.log is exactly \"save_completed 2026-10-13T06:48:59\\n\". Restore equality still passes, at the snapshot_published phase before SAVE_LOADED only (snapshot-000 equals loaded-stored-snapshot, b242cc87…, 118528 B). The different-process proof and the guards still pass, and both full ended.json files now show passed=true with no guard, cleanup or other errors. Menu ids, the reception and gold results, and pointer/resume remain unpinned CUA observations only. whole_unit_accepted=false.",
|
||
"findings": [
|
||
"PASS-LIMITED (ALL4 preservation, previous blocker fixed): The before and after captures each list exactly the same four files with identical bytes and SHA-256. The live re-hash at 06:58:05 UTC matches all four. The live manifest.json and world.bin pins in the evidence list agree. 'Preserved' here means the contents are byte-identical. The per-file mtimes/inodes in manual_ui were not supplied, so a rewrite with identical bytes cannot be ruled out. This does not affect the content-preservation claim.",
|
||
"PASS-LIMITED (capture timing): The before capture (created 06:49:14.08 UTC) falls between the quick save (manifest created_at 06:48:59 UTC, tick 103791) and the dialog opening (tick 148216, default label 15:49:43 JST, which is 06:49:43 UTC). The after capture (created 06:50:27.03 UTC) falls after the named save at tick 175078, which works out to about 06:50:10 UTC. It also falls after the dialog closed and save_path switched to manual_ui_6789… at tick 175108. The order is consistent to within about 1 s, the precision of the manifest timestamp.",
|
||
"PASS-LIMITED (capture author and method): Root wrote the captures with Python hashing (rglob, then sha256 of read_bytes). The engine controller did not write them, and no engine process could write to the artifacts dir. The weak point is that the same coordinator who makes the claim also wrote the captures. Their trustworthiness rests on the two file hashes (aed60147…, efb7170f…), the creation times, and how well they match the engine's own ticks and manifest. Nobody else re-ran the capture.",
|
||
"PASS-LIMITED (size difference explained): The before JSON embeds the full saved manifest. The after JSON has only the path, the file map and an equality flag. The extra manifest is a plausible size for the 710-byte difference. The four-file maps are identical. The embedded manifest is internally consistent with the slot: save_id manual_ui, minute 444, display_name 手動保存, and a created time that matches the 35-byte journal content.",
|
||
"PASS-LIMITED (restore equality, unchanged): The capture at snapshot index 0 (tick 50749, minute 444) equals the snapshot read back from disk, by == and by SHA. This holds only at snapshot_published, before the ordinary SAVE_LOADED completion event, and does not show post-event equivalence. Minor: the consumer's operation was recorded as 'recovery' (recovery_mode=true), not 'load'. The safety report shows no automatic or forbidden repairs, so equality is not affected. It does mean the ordinary read went through the recovery entry point.",
|
||
"PASS-LIMITED (different processes and guards): PID 39701 and PID 40866 each came from their own Popen, and the observer logged the same PID in every row. Both ended.json files show passed=true, exit 0, no guard, cleanup or other errors, owned-cleanup only, and zero foreign signals. The source, stage and default-player guards ran after each run. The consumer reused the producer's profile.",
|
||
"SCOPE: The 'preexisting' slot was created by this same producer session's ordinary quick save, before the named save. It did not survive across sessions or come from an import.",
|
||
"SUPPORTED BUT NOT PROVEN (producer named-save dialog): The observer's state rows show the dialog visible with the label focused. The label text goes from the default to 'preserv' to 'preservation-r03'. Then the label loses focus, the save completes at tick 175078, and the dialog closes. That backs up the named-save flow, but not the menu item id3 specifically. The contents of the new manifest (cd450b44…) were not supplied, so display_name=preservation-r03 on disk is not checked.",
|
||
"OBSERVER LIMIT (resume): events.jsonl (pinned) now shows 88 snapshot_published captures, minutes 444 through 531, contiguous, with a 35 s gap after the restore that fits a pause and then resume. That supports clock progress 444→531 in the consumer. Reception reaching completion and gold 4500/material 42 are not shown by any supplied capture contents. Snapshots 001–087 are listed only by hash in the log, not as pinned evidence files. These remain CUA-only.",
|
||
"OBSERVER LIMIT (menus and pointer): The consumer's menu id2, the list/select of the named slot, the confirm-read, and pointer/resume input are unpinned native CUA observations. The observer does not log PopupMenu item ids. These are not accepted as pointer/resume conditions.",
|
||
"MINOR (observer not fully passive, unchanged): Connecting to snapshot_published makes the signal emit when it otherwise would not, and the handler adds a create_snapshot() call. This is a read-only path, but it is a different code path from an unobserved run.",
|
||
"NOT CLAIMED/NOT ACCEPTED: whole P24/P24-02, all content, Windows or other platforms, post-event equivalence, a repeated full roster, standalone pointer/resume or menu-id acceptance."
|
||
],
|
||
"whole_unit_accepted": false
|
||
},
|
||
"artifact": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p24-02-operations/runs/3b30533319954ada9252809c552dbc5b",
|
||
"model": "claude-opus-5-5",
|
||
"formal_runner_review": false,
|
||
"whole_unit_accepted": false,
|
||
"supplement_sha256": "a7aa38caec8b6968c9bde7ddbcd359ea1ca4cc4ec6108e6e02ec04796dbce1f9",
|
||
"input_proof_sha256": "024a2cb0aba292037f281a3eea43b5eac95d773fa0517e77b32b08ef5084e7c1"
|
||
}
|