8 lines
3.4 KiB
JSON
8 lines
3.4 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"action": "wait",
|
|
"task_id": "P22-02",
|
|
"reason": "P22-02 stays on wait. Advisory 25eefc570e4540d9aacd05c9763233b1 found original_unit_accepted=false. High: the positive integration path is unproved. Medium: negatives for rights, quantity, layout and the real ledger are missing, and some evidence is stale. All three repairs are used. No cap 4, no repeated full regression and no main adoption. Keep candidate aad6284f and the exact 491572-token full packet as they are. Do not count P22-02 as an original acceptance, and do not award partial points against 30/88. P02-01 and P02-02 are already formally complete, so they are not repeated.\n\nNEXT CHOSEN PLAN: P08-02, safe change to old placements. Why: it is the only candidate whose dependencies are met now. P04 waits on the owner's D05 decision. P06 waits on value approval. P13 and P18 repairs wait on the owner. P23 gestures wait on Windows. P24-01 needs UI for thoughts, emotion and shield that is not wired yet, plus a P18 candidate and unknown values. P26-01 depends on D08 and D09, which are unresolved. P08-02 can reuse the accepted P03-02 inputs. Bad migrations damage saves, so it has high value.\n\nBefore the contract is frozen, reread the exact P08-02 entry in docs/traceability/original/BASELINE.txt and the accepted-input files. Do not rely on this summary. All original acceptance conditions must be met: (1) problems with original dimensions are shown to the player, who chooses what happens; (2) unsafe auto-correction is rejected; (3) nothing overlaps, is orphaned or disappears; (4) when a problem cannot be solved, the original placements and saves are kept byte-identical, and formal backups stay intact.\n\nMissing evidence:\n- The player-choice display has been run and observed, including cancel and confirm.\n- Negatives show that unsafe auto-corrections are refused.\n- Each P03-02 rejected batch has overlap, orphan and disappearance checks: native cross-PID moving, boarded EV, rescue, logistics, and concurrent build.\n- Raw-state and save hashes are byte-identical before and after an unsolvable case, and backups are kept.\n- An independent review is done.\n\nMigration diagnostics alone do not prove P08-02.\n\nEvidence reuse: only reuse P03-02's exact raw states and formal backups after checking the version, the input SHA and the source applicability. Do not guess D07 relation conversions; record unknowns explicitly.\n\nRead-only audit scope:\n- Placement migration and validation code, the save load and write path, and backup handling.\n- The P03-02 evidence manifests and hashes.\n- Existing tests that cover placement conflicts.\n- Find which product and UI gaps remain, and which files would need to change.\n\nAfter that: targeted local tests for the touched modules, an impact analysis, a full final regression only if a change touches shared save or placement paths at integration, and then an independent Opus review. No registration and no worker run until the contract is frozen. The criteria are not weakened, and the owner decides spec, denominator, budget and main changes.",
|
|
"codex_model": "gpt-6.1-sol",
|
|
"codex_model_reason": "This decision is wait, so no worker runs. Sol is the default. Its quality is enough for the next step, a bounded read-only audit and contract preparation, and it saves time and usage. Consider Astra only if the frozen P08-02 contract needs complex changes to save and placement migration code."
|
|
}
|