2 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
2 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
{"duration_api_ms":285650,"stop_reason":"tool_use","session_id":"dc5a02b5-5754-4e8f-8822-1c510271bf48","total_cost_usd":1.788384,"usage":{"input_tokens":42,"cache_creation_input_tokens":126444,"cache_read_input_tokens":1636620,"output_tokens":22467,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":13858},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":126444,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":0},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"modelUsage":{"claude-opus-5-5":{"inputTokens":42,"outputTokens":22467,"cacheReadInputTokens":1636620,"cacheCreationInputTokens":126444,"webSearchRequests":0,"costUSD":1.788384,"contextWindow":1000000,"maxOutputTokens":128000,"thinkingTokens":13858,"canonicalModel":"claude-opus-5-5","provider":"firstParty","costBasis":"list"}},"permission_denials":[],"terminal_reason":"completed","fast_mode_state":"off","fast_mode_disabled_reason":"sdk_opt_in_required","subagent_stats":{"spawned":0,"requested":{"background":0,"foreground":0,"unset":0},"started_in_background":0,"max_depth":0,"spawned_by_subagents":0,"completed":0,"failed":0,"killed":{"parent":0,"user":0,"system":0},"refused":{"depth_limit":0,"concurrency_limit":0,"budget":0},"by_type":{}},"is_error":false,"num_turns":33,"subtype":"success","api_error_status":null,"result":"{\"task_id\":\"P24-02\",\"commit\":\"78f7cba7a9fb5e5dcb144758e1a86fe63b3d7d08\",\"status\":\"changes_requested\",\"summary\":\"Limited independent static review of repair5 (S=78f7cba) in the Root prospective Q checkout (Q=60eadb8, M=54cade4, T=5dfac31). I used only Read, Grep and Glob, and ran nothing. This is not formal acceptance: acceptance_ids=[], all 8 conditions stay unaccepted, and original 30/88 and formally closed 14 are unchanged. Nothing here counts as Godot, native, OS, full-roster or Windows evidence.\\n\\nI read in full: composition.py, correspondence.py, test_repair5.py, PROTOCOL.md and STATUS.json; tools/check_p24_operations_evidence.py; repair4 check_repair4_preservation.py and test_checker_roster_head.py; the main.gd defense/guard region; the repair5 block in tests/ui/test_operations_notification.gd and its surroundings; the world_preview _gui_input/_can_drop_data/_drop_data code; operations_os_observer.gd; the P24 marker/policy rows; and the Root repair5 context files (CLARIFICATIONS, APPLICABILITY). From the manifest I read the Root result, re-audit and prepared-composition records and the prior 95cffd7 result.\\n\\n(1) composition.py is sound for its declared scope:\\n- Every Git call strips inherited GIT_* variables. An inherited override that changes HEAD is rejected, and CANDIDATE_COMMIT/TARGET_HEAD only cross-check. ROOT is the script root, and cwd must be the same toplevel.\\n- normal_validation requires HEAD=S. integration_final requires C=HEAD, exact [M,S] parents, C tree=T and a clean checkout. Q parents must be exactly [M,S] and the Q tree must equal T.\\n- merge-tree runs with a private object directory and index (repo objects as alternates). It must return exactly four typed CONTENT conflicts; binary, mode and type conflicts are rejected. Only those four entries are replaced with S blobs, and write-tree must equal T.\\n- Checks cover allowed_scope, S-only, Main-only and conflict provenance.\\n- The source map must be complete under the run_all_tests filter. The spec, marker, project.godot, policy and both helper SHAs are pinned. blob_bindings must exactly cover the source map plus inputs, verified by SHA1 and SHA256 and against checkout bytes for S-owned paths.\\n- The four Main 54cade4 input blobs are pinned, so a changed-M/stale-S new Q is rejected (with a test).\\n- The engine fingerprint (path, SHA, version plus a started/ended receipt) is separate from the Git blobs.\\n\\n(2) correspondence.py does reject aliases, record reuse, relabelled actions, missing meanings, fillers, all-true/opaque fields, scaffold/TEST-ONLY payloads, wrong root/S/T/source/pid/session/engine provenance, a same-PID restart and a different roster engine. A shared trace with distinct records is permitted. However, see the medium finding about the OS-event-only format for the final_validation_review meanings.\\n\\n(3) UI: defense_manager.visibility_changed is now connected before add_child (main.gd:3088-3089), which fixes the prior low finding. The new test asserts that the guard turns on when the dialog opens and off when it closes, which is a genuine regression check. Its model and selection preservation assertions are weak (low finding). Native execution is still required.\\n\\n(4) Pins: the P24 marker row and suite-policy SHA are both rebound to 50172ab6…, which is the actual test SHA in SOURCE_MANIFEST. The rest of the marker/policy JSON is unchanged, ignoring only that P24 SHA field (the preservation helper's 3-way ordered check). --write-evidence now behaves as documented. STATUS.json honestly lists every gap for all 8 conditions.\\n\\nBlocking: PreservationTests in test_repair5.py compares against the moving HEAD, so it fails when re-run at S or Q (medium). The correspondence format forces non-OS final-validation facts into OS-session events (medium).\\n\\nNot blocking, and not code failures in this batch: natural upstream cut-ins, IME/save/scales, actual bubble rendering, a real OS click on the staff panel, the exact final full roster, whole-8 review, normal integration/final, and Windows. These still need real evidence later.\",\"acceptance_ids\":[],\"findings\":[{\"severity\":\"medium\",\"message\":\"PreservationTests.test_exact_nonp24_and_schema_preservation in test_repair5.py (lines 311-322) uses the moving `HEAD:` as its pre-repair baseline, not the pinned source commit bd3a13405115fc9bf6c5acec55bcfef7dd15266a. It only passed in the worker's uncommitted state, where HEAD was still bd3a134. At the submitted commit S=78f7cba, and at Q=60eadb8, HEAD:scenes/main/main.gd already contains `defense_manager.visibility_changed.connect(_update_modal_input_guard)`. So `main_old.replace('\\\\t\\\\tadd_child(defense_manager)', '<connect>\\\\n\\\\t\\\\tadd_child(defense_manager)')` adds the line a second time and the assertEqual fails. For the same reason, `new[:start]+new[end:] == old` fails, because HEAD's test file already contains the inserted block. The world_preview comparison against HEAD is trivially true and proves nothing. The 21/21 pass in repair5_tests.log therefore cannot be reproduced at the exact submitted source, and a later re-run by Root on S, Q or C will report a failure. Fix in this batch: pin these comparisons to bd3a134 (as the JSON half of the test already does), or to a reviewed blob ID.\"},{\"severity\":\"medium\",\"message\":\"correspondence.verify (lines 141-149) requires every coverage meaning to be an OS-trace event: `/events/N` with action==meaning, monotonic_ns inside the single OS receipt's [started, ended] window, and provenance pid/session equal to os_environment. This includes the final_validation_review meanings static_import_local_affected (commands/results), exact_final_full_roster, independent_claude_runtime_review and current_main_integration_final (S/M/Q/T/mode), and doc facts such as held_gestures_deferred and macos_windows_classification. Genuine evidence cannot take this form:\\n- A full roster runs many separate engine processes.\\n- An independent Claude review happens after the runtime artifacts exist, yet it must reference runtime_artifact_sha256 from inside a trace recorded during that runtime.\\n- In normal_validation (HEAD=S) no integration-final record exists yet.\\nThe only way to pass is for Root to write these facts into the OS session trace with the OS PID/session and in-window timestamps, which is exactly the relabelling the design is meant to forbid. Separately, the exact_final_full_roster record's `results` only gets verify_engine per row. Its suite set and source SHAs are never compared with the full_roster list that the legacy _validate_condition_artifact_content actually validates; the positive test uses results=[receipt]. So the record linked to the meaning is not the validated roster. Fix in this batch: give non-OS meanings typed record kinds bound to their own actual artifacts and receipts (command logs, roster result rows, review artifact SHA, composition roles), and bind the coverage record to the same roster rows the suite-set check validates.\"},{\"severity\":\"low\",\"message\":\"composition.py pins only the Main side of the four conflict inputs (MAIN_INPUTS). Conflicts are always resolved to whatever blob S has, and nothing pins the reconciled S blobs. A later S that rewrites a conflict file, for example from the old P24 branch, dropping Main hunks, would still compose against an unchanged Main. That protection currently relies on check_repair4_preservation.py, which the checker does not call and which pins MAIN=51e8657. Consider pinning the reviewed S conflict blobs, or making preservation a checker input or gate.\"},{\"severity\":\"low\",\"message\":\"correspondence.verify keeps a `test_only=True` keyword route in production code that relaxes the scaffold/TEST-ONLY word filter. It is not reachable from the CLI and it requires fixture_scope=TEST-ONLY, so it is not an acceptance bypass. Still, the review asked for no test-only route in production; moving the adapter into the test module would be cleaner. Also, several malformed-input cases raise AttributeError, which is not in the checker's except tuple: a non-dict receipt (receipt.get), a non-dict before/after, or a non-dict os_environment. They end in an uncaught traceback (still exit 1) instead of a clean rejection.\"},{\"severity\":\"low\",\"message\":\"The new defense-modal test (tests/ui/test_operations_notification.gd:136-159) proves the visibility-callback fix through the modal_input_blocked true/false assertions. Its model and selection preservation assertions have no positive control, though. The click at (200,200) may not map to a buildable cell, and the drop at Vector2.ZERO probably hits no facility. Both could be no-ops even without the guard. A matching unblocked attempt that does change state, or a check that the targets are a valid cell and facility, would make these assertions meaningful. Native execution is still required.\"},{\"severity\":\"low\",\"message\":\"Carry-overs from prior review 95cffd7:\\n- Still open: world_preview.staff_assignment_clicked is still never emitted (dead wiring; documented, and the direct assign_staff_by_click call is not map-click evidence). check_repair4_preservation still compares bodies as sets of lines; this is documented and optional hardening was not done. Bubble first-relationship order, the heart rule and the O(N²) scan remain whole-8 review items.\\n- Fixed: the defense visibility hookup, --write-evidence behaviour, the HEAD root vs cwd split (now root_identity plus a verified T view), and the catch-all-plus-fillers case (now per-meaning coverage plus used==artifacts).\\n- Note: check_repair4_preservation.git_show and its ls-tree/grep calls still inherit GIT_* environment variables, unlike composition.clean_env.\"}]}","structured_output":{"task_id":"P24-02","commit":"78f7cba7a9fb5e5dcb144758e1a86fe63b3d7d08","status":"changes_requested","summary":"Limited independent static review of repair5 (S=78f7cba) in the Root prospective Q checkout (Q=60eadb8, M=54cade4, T=5dfac31). I used only Read, Grep and Glob, and ran nothing. This is not formal acceptance: acceptance_ids=[], all 8 conditions stay unaccepted, and original 30/88 and formally closed 14 are unchanged. Nothing here counts as Godot, native, OS, full-roster or Windows evidence.\n\nI read in full: composition.py, correspondence.py, test_repair5.py, PROTOCOL.md and STATUS.json; tools/check_p24_operations_evidence.py; repair4 check_repair4_preservation.py and test_checker_roster_head.py; the main.gd defense/guard region; the repair5 block in tests/ui/test_operations_notification.gd and its surroundings; the world_preview _gui_input/_can_drop_data/_drop_data code; operations_os_observer.gd; the P24 marker/policy rows; and the Root repair5 context files (CLARIFICATIONS, APPLICABILITY). From the manifest I read the Root result, re-audit and prepared-composition records and the prior 95cffd7 result.\n\n(1) composition.py is sound for its declared scope:\n- Every Git call strips inherited GIT_* variables. An inherited override that changes HEAD is rejected, and CANDIDATE_COMMIT/TARGET_HEAD only cross-check. ROOT is the script root, and cwd must be the same toplevel.\n- normal_validation requires HEAD=S. integration_final requires C=HEAD, exact [M,S] parents, C tree=T and a clean checkout. Q parents must be exactly [M,S] and the Q tree must equal T.\n- merge-tree runs with a private object directory and index (repo objects as alternates). It must return exactly four typed CONTENT conflicts; binary, mode and type conflicts are rejected. Only those four entries are replaced with S blobs, and write-tree must equal T.\n- Checks cover allowed_scope, S-only, Main-only and conflict provenance.\n- The source map must be complete under the run_all_tests filter. The spec, marker, project.godot, policy and both helper SHAs are pinned. blob_bindings must exactly cover the source map plus inputs, verified by SHA1 and SHA256 and against checkout bytes for S-owned paths.\n- The four Main 54cade4 input blobs are pinned, so a changed-M/stale-S new Q is rejected (with a test).\n- The engine fingerprint (path, SHA, version plus a started/ended receipt) is separate from the Git blobs.\n\n(2) correspondence.py does reject aliases, record reuse, relabelled actions, missing meanings, fillers, all-true/opaque fields, scaffold/TEST-ONLY payloads, wrong root/S/T/source/pid/session/engine provenance, a same-PID restart and a different roster engine. A shared trace with distinct records is permitted. However, see the medium finding about the OS-event-only format for the final_validation_review meanings.\n\n(3) UI: defense_manager.visibility_changed is now connected before add_child (main.gd:3088-3089), which fixes the prior low finding. The new test asserts that the guard turns on when the dialog opens and off when it closes, which is a genuine regression check. Its model and selection preservation assertions are weak (low finding). Native execution is still required.\n\n(4) Pins: the P24 marker row and suite-policy SHA are both rebound to 50172ab6…, which is the actual test SHA in SOURCE_MANIFEST. The rest of the marker/policy JSON is unchanged, ignoring only that P24 SHA field (the preservation helper's 3-way ordered check). --write-evidence now behaves as documented. STATUS.json honestly lists every gap for all 8 conditions.\n\nBlocking: PreservationTests in test_repair5.py compares against the moving HEAD, so it fails when re-run at S or Q (medium). The correspondence format forces non-OS final-validation facts into OS-session events (medium).\n\nNot blocking, and not code failures in this batch: natural upstream cut-ins, IME/save/scales, actual bubble rendering, a real OS click on the staff panel, the exact final full roster, whole-8 review, normal integration/final, and Windows. These still need real evidence later.","acceptance_ids":[],"findings":[{"severity":"medium","message":"PreservationTests.test_exact_nonp24_and_schema_preservation in test_repair5.py (lines 311-322) uses the moving `HEAD:` as its pre-repair baseline, not the pinned source commit bd3a13405115fc9bf6c5acec55bcfef7dd15266a. It only passed in the worker's uncommitted state, where HEAD was still bd3a134. At the submitted commit S=78f7cba, and at Q=60eadb8, HEAD:scenes/main/main.gd already contains `defense_manager.visibility_changed.connect(_update_modal_input_guard)`. So `main_old.replace('\\t\\tadd_child(defense_manager)', '<connect>\\n\\t\\tadd_child(defense_manager)')` adds the line a second time and the assertEqual fails. For the same reason, `new[:start]+new[end:] == old` fails, because HEAD's test file already contains the inserted block. The world_preview comparison against HEAD is trivially true and proves nothing. The 21/21 pass in repair5_tests.log therefore cannot be reproduced at the exact submitted source, and a later re-run by Root on S, Q or C will report a failure. Fix in this batch: pin these comparisons to bd3a134 (as the JSON half of the test already does), or to a reviewed blob ID."},{"severity":"medium","message":"correspondence.verify (lines 141-149) requires every coverage meaning to be an OS-trace event: `/events/N` with action==meaning, monotonic_ns inside the single OS receipt's [started, ended] window, and provenance pid/session equal to os_environment. This includes the final_validation_review meanings static_import_local_affected (commands/results), exact_final_full_roster, independent_claude_runtime_review and current_main_integration_final (S/M/Q/T/mode), and doc facts such as held_gestures_deferred and macos_windows_classification. Genuine evidence cannot take this form:\n- A full roster runs many separate engine processes.\n- An independent Claude review happens after the runtime artifacts exist, yet it must reference runtime_artifact_sha256 from inside a trace recorded during that runtime.\n- In normal_validation (HEAD=S) no integration-final record exists yet.\nThe only way to pass is for Root to write these facts into the OS session trace with the OS PID/session and in-window timestamps, which is exactly the relabelling the design is meant to forbid. Separately, the exact_final_full_roster record's `results` only gets verify_engine per row. Its suite set and source SHAs are never compared with the full_roster list that the legacy _validate_condition_artifact_content actually validates; the positive test uses results=[receipt]. So the record linked to the meaning is not the validated roster. Fix in this batch: give non-OS meanings typed record kinds bound to their own actual artifacts and receipts (command logs, roster result rows, review artifact SHA, composition roles), and bind the coverage record to the same roster rows the suite-set check validates."},{"severity":"low","message":"composition.py pins only the Main side of the four conflict inputs (MAIN_INPUTS). Conflicts are always resolved to whatever blob S has, and nothing pins the reconciled S blobs. A later S that rewrites a conflict file, for example from the old P24 branch, dropping Main hunks, would still compose against an unchanged Main. That protection currently relies on check_repair4_preservation.py, which the checker does not call and which pins MAIN=51e8657. Consider pinning the reviewed S conflict blobs, or making preservation a checker input or gate."},{"severity":"low","message":"correspondence.verify keeps a `test_only=True` keyword route in production code that relaxes the scaffold/TEST-ONLY word filter. It is not reachable from the CLI and it requires fixture_scope=TEST-ONLY, so it is not an acceptance bypass. Still, the review asked for no test-only route in production; moving the adapter into the test module would be cleaner. Also, several malformed-input cases raise AttributeError, which is not in the checker's except tuple: a non-dict receipt (receipt.get), a non-dict before/after, or a non-dict os_environment. They end in an uncaught traceback (still exit 1) instead of a clean rejection."},{"severity":"low","message":"The new defense-modal test (tests/ui/test_operations_notification.gd:136-159) proves the visibility-callback fix through the modal_input_blocked true/false assertions. Its model and selection preservation assertions have no positive control, though. The click at (200,200) may not map to a buildable cell, and the drop at Vector2.ZERO probably hits no facility. Both could be no-ops even without the guard. A matching unblocked attempt that does change state, or a check that the targets are a valid cell and facility, would make these assertions meaningful. Native execution is still required."},{"severity":"low","message":"Carry-overs from prior review 95cffd7:\n- Still open: world_preview.staff_assignment_clicked is still never emitted (dead wiring; documented, and the direct assign_staff_by_click call is not map-click evidence). check_repair4_preservation still compares bodies as sets of lines; this is documented and optional hardening was not done. Bubble first-relationship order, the heart rule and the O(N²) scan remain whole-8 review items.\n- Fixed: the defense visibility hookup, --write-evidence behaviour, the HEAD root vs cwd split (now root_identity plus a verified T view), and the catch-all-plus-fillers case (now per-meaning coverage plus used==artifacts).\n- Note: check_repair4_preservation.git_show and its ls-tree/grep calls still inherit GIT_* environment variables, unlike composition.clean_env."}]},"ttft_ms":3740,"type":"result","duration_ms":288628,"uuid":"aa4e6c5d-c517-404e-993e-1e5258015332","ttft_stream_ms":2243,"time_to_request_ms":141,"first_content_frame_ms":2243,"queued_turn_count":0,"result_index":0}
|