TheTree_mock/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p28-02/eq/PROGRESS.md

P28-02-EQ progress — S6 (repair 12, Claude Opus 5.5 Desktop implementation)

Implementer: Claude Opus 5.5 in the Desktop control session, by the user's delegation ("Codexの使用量上限いきそうなので、作業をひきとって"; Root relayed 「実装担当含めOpusに委任」). The registered contract keeps worker codex; no Codex/Astra run was started for this stage. Submission goes through the normal Runner submit, which makes the commit. 正式受入は保留、原本加算0。

• S a46418d064 (repair 11): its exact-S native passed (native-a46418d-r01, 7 phases, cleanup errors empty, sealed), and its formal validation cb059f305dd34e7aa811b40ad1cfb6f2 passed both checks (unit 162 tests OK; native-verify exit 0, verified). The fresh independent Opus review (session local_179020e9-e4c8-45ab-aaa0-be27aaa3f3d6, DESKTOP_RESULT.json c08eedb2ff81fd308e0771aeb4330076389561255a2bb964567be28f478592cd) returned changes_requested: EQ1-EQ4 and EQ6 met, EQ5 not met. The normal intake recorded review_failed and repair_pending; the normal repair made repairs 12. All of it is retained.
• The high finding is accepted: the source closure was only unit-tested. run_eq and verify_eq required the before SOURCE_SHA, so the frozen EQ could not admit an OPT S that changes only registered allowed files (OPT_CONTRACT_T1 §2 and §4). S6 (EQ_S6_AFTER_VERSION_PLAN):
  • BEFORE_SOURCE_MAP.json holds the registered base product source map (1407 rows); its digest must equal the existing SOURCE_SHA on every read. compare_versions.admit_source admits the before version (no registration, no difference) or an after version (the changed set equals the sorted registered OPT files; no added or missing source).
  • run_eq --opt-changed PATH (repeatable) registers the OPT files; actual_pins records registered_changes and source_closure, the admission records version and measured_source (before S_eq-native-not-Q, after S_opt-native-not-Q; never Q). verify_eq re-runs the closure with the recorded registration and requires the recorded closure, version and label; actual_pins on the checkout gets the same registration.
  • verify_eq --compare-versions --before --after is the bundle-level entry of the comparator (SPEC §2): both seals, versions and closures again, every non-product pin equal, compare_reports on the sealed A-phase reports of R and O, existing defects of both versions listed (after_all_e_pass for the OPT judgment).
• The three low findings are fixed: the probe records the actual _latest_digest_dirty before each E5 operation (false or null accepted, true rejected); bundled_inputs requires the collector's fixed manifest SHA and normalized absolute destinations inside the read-only directory; the seal (bundle schema v2) records every directory, empty ones included.
• Evidence kinds are kept apart:
  • Unit, engine-free, real code paths: admit_source; run_eq.actual_pins with a synthetic map (only collector.source_map, inputs, host SHAs of the synthetic fixture/engine and the machine query are patched); recompute of a real synthetic after bundle; compare_bundles unmocked on a real before and a real after synthetic bundle (positive, a real state difference, pin drift, closure and label tampering, seal tampering, swapped, same bundle). One unit test (S6Admission main) mocks actual_pins only to see the registration main passes; it is not counted as admission evidence.
  • Diagnostic, not formal (EQ_S6_AFTER_ADMISSION_DIAG_R01 in the Root control folder): the real run_eq.py --check, unmocked, on a throwaway after-version checkout (an APFS clone of this working tree as its own temporary git repository, one allowed OPT file changed and committed). Before version and the registered after version were admitted; no registration, a wrong registration, a registration without change, an added source and a non-OPT change were rejected with the source closure error. No engine was started.
• Unit evidence (engine-free python3 -B test_eq.py; full raw outputs with SHA files):
  • Class-targeted runs during development were displayed through tail and are not claimed as retained raw results. One of them ran out of disk space (the first S6 bundle tests copied 709 MB synthetic bundles); the tests now clone with cp -c and build two bundles per class.
  • UNIT_OUTPUT_S6_ATTEMPT_01 (final, all changes included): 179 tests OK in 207.351 s, Python exit 0; same bytes as UNIT_OUTPUT.txt, SHA-256 9dd93de5fd3b66791d6902d51a055caa2c3dd559de6c42019ebb1ab147b2af11.
  • UNIT_OUTPUT_S6_SEATBELT_01: the same suite under the Runner validation seatbelt profile, run locally (see its exit line in IMPLEMENTATION.md). Local runs are not formal validation.
• Test bodies changed for S6, each recorded here: the E5 fixture detail carries latest_digest_dirty_before false instead of digest_materialized_before true, and the materialization test rejects true; s4_bundle_fixture takes an optional registration and pin overrides and records commit, version, measured_source, registered_changes, source_closure and the non-product pins; the S4 probe-admission mock returns a before source_closure; the stored-result test records registered_changes [] in its admission and mock; the bundled-inputs test holds its synthetic manifest to its own SHA in place of the collector's and expects the manifest error before the escape error. All other earlier test bodies and raw outputs are unchanged; 17 S6 tests were added.

Next: Runner submit → exact-S native 7 phases (before version, no --opt-changed) → bundle → p28-02-eq-unit and p28-02-eq-native-verify → fresh independent Opus review of all 6 conditions → normal qualification, approval, integration and final → OPT/whole-unit. 23/88、4/30は不変。

Retained S5 progress (unchanged historical text)

Implementer: Claude Opus 5.5 in the Desktop control session, by the user's delegation ("Codexの使用量上限いきそうなので、作業をひきとって"; Root relayed 「実装担当含めOpusに委任」). The registered contract keeps worker codex; no Codex/Astra run was started for this stage. Submission goes through the normal Runner submit, which makes the commit. 正式受入は保留、原本加算0。

• Exact-S native of 6f75c9a failed in R-A (user://evidence mkdir) and stays a failure; the owner intake recorded it and the normal repair made repairs 10.

• Fixed the harness defects that only the real engine showed (evidence mkdir under the guard, typed script metadata, manifest/guard JSON floats, signed instance IDs, large E4 returns) and recorded the product's event-stream replacement on restore as an existing defect while the probe keeps capturing every event (EQ_S5_SCALE_PLAN r02 §3-4).

• Content-addressed gzip blobs and exact Python fast paths keep R and O at full E1-E5 scope (39 scenarios each) within the unchanged 1800 s phase and 300 s validation limits.

• Scratchpad diagnostics with the same guard and HOME redirected (not formal evidence): see the S5 section of IMPLEMENTATION.md for measured times and sizes.

• Unit evidence (engine-free python3 -B test_eq.py; full raw outputs with SHA files):

  • UNIT_OUTPUT_S5_ATTEMPT_01: 146 tests, 9 failures and 5 errors (the S5 evidence format against old fixtures and one old static snippet list). Kept as a failure.
  • UNIT_OUTPUT_S5_ATTEMPT_02: 156 tests OK in 211.416 s (run beside an R engine run).
  • UNIT_OUTPUT_S5_ATTEMPT_03: 160 tests OK in 130.451 s, Python exit 0 (after the parallel verifier fix). An intermediate full run failed once (160 tests, 1 error: closed worker stdin); only its single-test rerun output was kept, and the fix is in phase_results.
  • Class-targeted runs during development were displayed through tail and are not claimed as retained raw results.
  • UNIT_OUTPUT_S5_ATTEMPT_04: 151 tests, 3 errors, Python exit 1: the new differential test imported random, outside the closed EQ import list, so the driver's closure check rejected test_eq.py. The test now uses its own deterministic generator; the list is unchanged.
  • UNIT_OUTPUT_S5_ATTEMPT_05 (final, all changes included): 161 tests OK in 121.627 s, Python exit 0, outer 121.748 s; same bytes as UNIT_OUTPUT.txt, SHA-256 7372a382cc2f3c090013874d8f28f17cad4cb1b965ad86c86de7a21fc2d851a8.

• Test bodies changed for the S5 format, each recorded here: E3 evidence and E4 restore/load details carry event_stream; the S4 phase fixture lifecycle is S5; the S2 static list names transport(snapshot_value) instead of the removed diff-chain snippet; s2_report signals carry event_counter/command_counter and its runtime next_command_id; the E4/E5 fixture emits the product's publishes; the accepted-restore E3 test adds the restore publish; the E4 load fixture event uses a domain_event ID. All other earlier test bodies and raw outputs are unchanged; 15 S5 tests were added.

• Repair 11 (after the first S5 submission b2dbda8c95):

  • Its exact-S native passed: driver exit 0, execution passed, cleanup errors empty, R-A/R-B and O-A/O-B compared with 0 differences, sealed (native-b2dbda8-r01, 5954 files). This exercised the whole S5 driver path on real data.
  • Its formal validation (report c02eda130f6c49e6bcf2ec4a7c1e8f69): p28-02-eq-unit passed (161 tests); p28-02-eq-native-verify failed, exit 1, 'Operation not permitted' on the fixture. The Runner validation seatbelt cannot read data under the home directory outside the checkout and the task runtime, and verify_eq read the original fixture and read-only inputs. Kept as a failure; the b2dbda8 bundle is retained but not reused.
  • Fix: run_eq seals copies of the fixture and the nine read-only inputs inside the bundle after checking them against the admission pins; verify_eq recomputes the pins from the checkout and those sealed copies by the same rules (bundled_inputs). No permission, policy, timeout or Runner configuration change.
  • Final unit evidence for repair 11: UNIT_OUTPUT_S5_ATTEMPT_06 (162 tests OK in 120.853 s, Python exit 0, outer 120.983 s; same bytes as UNIT_OUTPUT.txt, SHA-256 846ab3b45705f269a81181c818dc5e3b8bc0057863794d59e8d641fe5a4e4c32) and UNIT_OUTPUT_S5_SEATBELT_06 (the same suite under the Runner validation seatbelt profile, run locally: 162 tests OK in 120.930 s, Python exit 0). Local runs are not formal validation.

Next: Runner submit → exact-S native 7 phases → bundle → p28-02-eq-unit and p28-02-eq-native-verify → fresh independent Opus review of all 6 conditions → normal qualification, approval, integration and final → OPT/whole-unit. 23/88、4/30は不変。

Retained S4 r03 progress (unchanged historical text)

S4 の保持済み実装に対する残作業を完了し、局所unitの証拠として提出する。 正式受入は保留、原本加算0。 以下の旧段階の記録は履歴であり、現在の提出状態を表すものではない。

• run_eq.main と verify_eq.recompute の check_probe 戻り値を検査し、 ok:false を全 errors 付きで拒否する。driver の両モードで共通。 両ファイル内の他の checker 呼出しも戻り値契約を確認済み。
• 既存134件（元119件を含む）の試験本体を変更せず、12件を追加。 driver/verifier の false/true、owned start/end/exit/diagnostic、profile、 nine destinations、join 後の決定性不一致、保存済み結果・sidecar・ raw/joined 入替えの拒否を対象とする。engine は全て不使用。
• 対象クラス attempt 07: 8件中1件失敗。追加試験の模擬不一致が自己比較にも 作用したため、試験だけを修正。失敗の raw/exit/SHA を保存。
• attempt 08: 9件、86.276秒、OK、exit 0。
• attempt 09: 保存済み結果の結合試験3件、0.025秒、OK、exit 0。
• 最後の全件試験 attempt 10: python3 -B test_eq.py、146件、 293.277秒、OK、exit 0（外側の所要時間293.5742515秒）。 生出力は UNIT_OUTPUT_S4_ATTEMPT_10.txt と UNIT_OUTPUT.txt に保存。 SHA-256: ff6fc0065772434f9ca35a1267e24d199057e339869a868942a41829327503bb。 開始は01:05:07 UTCまで、期限まで300秒以上を確保した。全件実行は今回1回。
• S4_SUPPLEMENTARY.json は Root の r09 JSON を直接読み、内容を変えず actual_commander_context に保存。追加 r03 と判断も提供ファイルから読む。 5資料、過去8計画、API notes の SHA を照合済み。 134件の元ファイル再構成SHAは cb742b252dbc278113b3c11c2431adac35b0c2e201a762a8ea1ac926e4af414b。
• IMPLEMENTATION.md 冒頭に、全 S4 must、S4 binding、r01/r02/r03 の 要件・コード・試験の対応表を記録した。旧文書と全失敗履歴は保持。
• 外部 retained copy の読取りは PermissionError となったため、権限を変えず、 W 内の保持prefixと元mainから元ファイルSHAを再現して確認した。 読取り用heredocも実行前に失敗し、その後は python -c を使用した。

過去のS4 attempt 01/02/04と補足生成assertは失敗のまま保持。 attempt 05 の132件PASSはその版だけの事実。遅着した attempt 06 は 134件/206.531秒/OKだが、provider exit124・完了通知/exit受領なし・未提出の 事実は変更しない。今回の全件結果とは区別する。

提出後は Root の正確な S の native 7 phase → bundle 配置 → p28-02-eq-unit と p28-02-eq-native-verify → fresh 独立 Opus の全6条件レビュー → 通常の資格確認・承認・統合・final → OPT/whole-unit。23/88、4/30は不変。 worker は engine、正式validation、Runner、git書込み、他agent、製品変更、 全回帰を実行していない。局所unitをnative、受入済みS、Q測定、製品PASSとは呼ばない。

Retained prior progress (unchanged)

P28-02-EQ progress — current S3b (repair 7)

stage S3b complete (not a failure; next is S4)

段階 S3b 完了（失敗ではない。次は S4）。指定に従い正式 status は blocked。 S_eq は未提出。全6受入条件の正式判定は保留、原本加算0。

• E4: 両 role に共通の5経路を実装。E4-1 はその PID の definition_registry.get_facility_ids() を使い、登録順/文字順/件数、 公開 bounds、全候補の preview、最初の配置可能候補、submit/処理結果を保持。 空 registry、誤った列挙元、欠落した試行、false NA は拒否する。
• E5: 4対象×dict/array×2方向の16組。handler 外で操作し、 完全な前後 S/K/C、返却値、digest、全イベント、別区間の signal を保持。 aliasing は changed path/value 付きの existing-defect として出力し、PASS にしない。
• checker: 39 scenario（既存E3の18 + E4の5 + E5の16）の結合、 区間連続、全イベント、restore 0/load 1、X(P,event)、所有権を検査。 caller の PASS や、publish 時点だけによる cache_stale 判定は拒否する。
• 比較器の局所修正は、追加試験の失敗で確認した2点だけ： E5外から内の直後の cached digest 不整合を既存不具合として保持すること、 返却値の typed facts にも辞書順だけの fallback を適用すること。
• 既存91件の試験ソースを元の構成に再結合した SHA は f81185e506954964bb96b31a569233202a1a7e7c78b2121aba6ab3f2e24d7e1e と一致。 E3本体、過去の進捗と全試験履歴は保持した。
• 最終局所 unit: python3 -B test_eq.py、119 tests、OK、終了コード0。 既存91 + S3b追加28。Godot/native・正式validationは未実行。 生出力は UNIT_OUTPUT_S3B_ATTEMPT_09.txt と UNIT_OUTPUT.txt、対応SHAを保存。
• S3b試行履歴（すべて生出力/SHAを保存）: 01=91件PASS、02=追加試験の構文エラー、 03=114件中digest既存不具合の比較試験1件失敗、 04/05=114件PASS、06=118件PASS、 07=辞書順fallbackの単独試験1件失敗、 08=119件中そのfixtureのcheckpoint欠落で1件失敗、 09=119件PASS。失敗を成功で上書きしていない。
• S3B_SUPPLEMENTARY.json の単一 actual_commander_context key に 両S3b計画、両S3計画、両段階計画、今回のRUN判断全文を保持。 計画6件のSHA、SPEC/TASK、references/registration、読取専用補足、 S2/S3a補足、既存出力のSHAを照合した。

次はS4（driver・verify・bundleと提出）。IMPLEMENTATION.md末尾に、 lifecycle.e45、e45-NN、raw/joined facts、sidecar、既存不具合の結合を追記。 その後にRootの凍結Sで7 native phase、両validation、独立Opusレビュー、 通常の資格確認・承認・統合・final。S3bのunit結果をnative/Qの結果とは呼ばない。

engine、Runner、git書込み、他agent、製品変更、全回帰は実行していない。

Retained prior S3b-blocked/S3a/S2/S1 history (unchanged)

Final S3b unit SHA-256: 8360a2065b303099d5c546b3e4aecc0cc0ab0c2c1e5120b8034b6a1a64317030

P28-02-EQ progress — S3b blocked before implementation

S3b is not complete. S_eq is not submitted. All six acceptance gates remain pending; original credit remains 0. The retained S3a history follows unchanged.

Specification/API mismatch affecting E4-1 coverage

EQ_S3B_STAGE_PLAN.txt E4-1 explicitly chooses the facility definition list from mvp_content_catalog. The product's scripts/data/mvp_content_catalog.gd:26-31 DEFAULT_PATHS contains only guest_classes, species, staff_candidates and unique_characters. Its get_ids(content_type) at :217-223 returns an empty list for an absent content type. It supplies no facility definition enumeration.

Facility definitions instead belong to definition_registry: scripts/core/definition_registry.gd:64-75 exposes get_facility, get_facility_ids and get_all_facilities. Runtime initializes this registry from FacilityCatalog paths at autoload/simulation_runtime.gd:446-447, and the public preview_build_facility at :7660-7668 looks up that registry.

Using an absent catalog type and reporting NA would not prove that no facility is placeable. Replacing the explicitly fixed enumeration source with the registry changes the candidates used by the required E4-1 acceptance scenario. Per the instruction not to supplement missing specifications, this needs an explicit correction of E4-1 to authorize the actual definition source. Proposed correction: enumerate runtime.definition_registry.get_facility_ids() in textual ID order, retaining the specified cell scan and public placement check. This is a proposal only, not an implemented or approved change.

Only this progress note changed. No implementation or tests were changed or removed. The supplied SHA values for IMPLEMENTATION.md, eq_probe.gd, check_eq.py, compare_versions.py, test_eq.py and UNIT_OUTPUT.txt matched before this note. The 91-test result below is retained S3a evidence, not a test execution in this run. No new unit test, engine, Runner, git write, agent, or product operation ran. The first progress-note write attempt failed before writing because zsh could not create a heredoc temporary file; this note was then written by apply_patch. S3b E4/E5 and then S4 remain pending. Do not label this run S3b complete.

Retained S3a/S2/S1 progress (unchanged historical text)

P28-02-EQ progress — current S3a

stage S3a complete (not a failure; next is S3b)

段階 S3a 完了（失敗ではない。次は S3b）。計画に従い正式 status は blocked。 S_eq は未提出。6受入条件はすべて保留、原本加算0。

• checker: phase key は正確に0..10。重複JSON keyも拒否。 30分各checkpointにsnapshot_published → state_updatedがちょうど1組必要。 測定開始の接続一覧にprobe自身の接続がなければ失敗。
• probe/checker: E3の3 API × 6分類を、適用/NAの18行で記録・検査。 B1の固定変異、実際のAPI戻り値、package全bytes/SHA、完全S/K/C、 全イベント差、scenario signal、区間の連続性、X(B, ev_fail)を保持。 codeを創作せず、期待外の製品結果は既存不具合候補として残す。
• S1 comparatorは元のSHAのまま。S1/S2の試験本体を保持 （指定checker修正に必要なS2 fixture/呼出しの変更のみ）。
• 最終局所試験: python3 -B test_eq.py、91 tests, OK、終了コード0。 S3a追加19件。Godot/native/正式validationは未実行。
• 生出力: UNIT_OUTPUT.txt と UNIT_OUTPUT_S3A_ATTEMPT_04.txt。 SHA-256: 02221ae41e5dd40ecdac0ec0d7ffc657f265d3194c3817583c2b88ad375f132b。 S3aの01/02/03/04試行（72/85/91/91件、全件PASS）を個別に保存。 既存のS1失敗出力・S2出力とSHAは変更せず保持。
• S3A_SUPPLEMENTARY.json: 単一actual_commander_context keyに 両S3計画・両段階計画・今回のRUN判断全文を保存。4計画のSHA一致。
• SPEC/TASK/references/registration、read-only補足3件、S2補足、 S1 comparatorと全ての既存UNIT_OUTPUT履歴のSHA一致を確認。

次はS3b（E4/E5）だけ。その後S4（driver/bundleと提出）、 Rootの7 native phase、両validation、新しい独立Opusレビュー、 通常の承認・統合・final。S4でlifecycle.measurement/e3/e3_b1と private evidenceを結合する必要がある。詳細はIMPLEMENTATION.md末尾。

engine、Runner、git書込み、他agent、製品変更、全回帰は実行していない。

Retained S2/S1 progress (unchanged historical text)

P28-02-EQ progress — current S2

stage S2 complete (not a failure; next is S3)

段階 S2 完了（失敗ではない。次は S3）。計画 G4 に従い status は blocked。 正式提出はしていない。6受入条件はすべて保留、原本加算0。

• eq_probe.gd: DIAG の6段階起動、A1 encode/decode、A2 bytes roundtrip、 A3 全 B1/毎 tick 差分、31 checkpoint、B の全イベント記録、 guard 実値照合、private evidence、単一 report 行、close_requested を実装。
• check_eq.py: S1 schema の形式/矛盾、正規化の結合、raw 観測/起動証跡、 静的禁止の検査を追加。S3 の scenario は未着手。
• test_eq.py: S1 43件を保持し、S2 29件を追加。最終 72 tests, OK。 実行は python3 -B test_eq.py のみ。native・正式 validation は未実行。
• 生出力: UNIT_OUTPUT.txt。SHA-256: 9d323abda9bfffa02faf3a9d5cb56aa87e647017c991eb55b4807cf734386698。 S2 の3試行も UNIT_OUTPUT_S2_ATTEMPT_01/02/03.txt と SHA に保存。 S1 の最終出力は UNIT_OUTPUT_S1_FINAL.txt に保存。下記の失敗履歴と UNIT_OUTPUT_ATTEMPT_01/02 は変更せず保持。
• S2_SUPPLEMENTARY.json: 単一 actual_commander_context key に両計画全文、 RUN判断全文、read-only 補足の path/SHA を保持。両計画の SHA 一致を確認。

次は S3 の E3/E4/E5 操作・結果・検査。その後 S4 の driver/bundle を実装し、 Root/Runner の7 native phase、両 validation、新しい独立レビュー、承認・統合・final。 engine、Runner、git 書込み、他 agent、製品変更、全回帰は実行していない。

Retained S1 progress (unchanged historical text)

P28-02-EQ progress

Current stage

stage S1 complete (not a failure; next is S2)

段階 S1 完了（失敗ではない。次は S2）。正式な返却 status は計画 G4 に従い blocked。 S_eq の提出、受入の自己確定、原本への加算はしていない。

Completed

• compare_versions.py: typed tree 比較、F1–F3 の4つの normalize/restore 関数、 全 checkpoint の差分再構成と tree SHA 再計算、report の S/latest/K/C/E2/ scenario 比較、source map 1407件の固定と許可された変更集合の完全一致検査。
• test_eq.py: 合成入力のみの43試験。型・挿入順・深い tree・可逆性・guard・ violations・sidecar 改ざん・全イベント・比較除外・source 閉包の正常/拒否を検査。
• IMPLEMENTATION.md: S2 向けの内部データ形式と、後続 checker/native の責任を記録。

Unit evidence

実行: python3 test_eq.py（engine 不使用）。最新結果: 43 tests, OK、終了コード0。 生出力: UNIT_OUTPUT.txt。 SHA-256: cdca0cdd551ce76c6100c4dd90e04559551f9d88c054a19a2bc6a77e6572ae15。

初回の36試験中1失敗（F3 sidecar の欠落を見逃した）は UNIT_OUTPUT_ATTEMPT_01.txt と .sha256 にそのまま保持した。 予約 token の復元漏れを拒否する修正後、41試験 PASS の中間出力も UNIT_OUTPUT_ATTEMPT_02.txt と .sha256 に保持した。 失敗を成功に書き換えていない。作成したファイルは削除していない。

Remaining stages and gates

• S2: eq_probe.gd の6段階起動、Godot encode/decode と bytes roundtrip、31 checkpoint と E2 の evidence 書出し、check_eq.py の形式/静的検査、対応 unit。
• S3: E3/E4/E5 専用区間、全ての場面/入力の実行と実値の保存、絶対条件の checker。
• S4: run_eq.py と verify_eq.py、全依存 SHA の固定、bundle 結合/拒否試験、正式提出。
• Root/Runner: 凍結した S_eq で7 native phase、両正式 validation、独立レビュー、 通常の承認・統合・final。6受入条件は全て保留。

engine、Runner、git 書込み、他 agent、製品変更、全回帰は実行していない。