8 lines
3.4 KiB
JSON
8 lines
3.4 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"action": "run",
|
|
"task_id": "MP-01-r02",
|
|
"reason": "MP-01-r02 is in repair_ready. The owner explicitly approved raising the per-task repair cap from 1 to 2 in call_de866e18b25942ee8992263aa0189278. The used count of 1 is kept, so this run is the second and last allowed repair (2/2). No more repairs are left after this one. Nothing in the contract, permissions or acceptance denominator changes. depends_on is empty. The mana-proposal-draft resource lock is only used by this task. The two reuse inputs, proposal.json and PROPOSAL.md, are already in allowed_paths in the same implementation worktree, and their SHAs match the existing proposal. Starting the run is therefore the right next step. Scope: edit only those 2 documents. Do not create a duplicate implementation and do not do a fresh full investigation. Corrections: (1) Change source_pins to a dictionary of {repo-relative path: raw-file SHA256}, and move provenance (original / current implementation / fixture / candidate) into a separate field. (2) In demand_catalog, the 4 facilities that omit maintenance_mana are listed as 0, with the FacilityDefinition default of 0 cited as the basis. The 13 facilities not yet implemented from the original stay unknown and must not be treated as 0. (3) Describe GameState initial mana 100 (an initial balance) and STARTER_MANA_OUTPUT 100 (network supply capacity) separately. (4) Reproduce the surplus comparison B200 G40 D63: the balance first hits 0 in interval 9 and is 16 after interval 8. (5) Reproduce the furnace cases with B200 C300 G20 D16 F100: 304 → overflow 4; B196 → 300; B300 → overflow 104. (6) Keep the headroom candidate (checked after generation and demand) clearly separate from the alternative that checks before demand, and state that choosing between them is still unapproved. (7) State explicitly: nothing is consumed on rejection; person, mana and receipt changes are atomic and replays do not apply twice; reaching 0 stops all facilities; the legacy-0 handling; the D05 update order is not decided; the existing 00/06/18 boundaries are preserved; person eligibility is not decided. Candidate values (100 initial / 300 capacity / World Tree 20 per 10 minutes / furnace 1 person → 100 mana) remain awaiting approval and must not go into the product. Do not invent original values. The spec hash is checked with the Runner method (string.strip() then UTF-8), and a trailing-newline difference alone is not a reason to block. After submission, the Runner must run the proposal-consistency validation and a separate Claude review. This artifact does not complete P06-01 and is not an addition to the 88 deliverables.",
|
|
"codex_model": "gpt-6.1-sol",
|
|
"codex_model_reason": "This is a reuse-only edit to 2 documents. The worker only restructures the JSON (source_pins dictionary, separate provenance field), rewrites the wording for the facility classification and the initial-mana vs network-capacity distinction, and recomputes a few already-given numbers by simple arithmetic. No new numeric design, product-code change or wider investigation is needed, so the default gpt-6.1-sol is enough in quality and better on time and usage. gpt-6-astra would only be worth it for open-ended design or a hard investigation, which this task does not have. The last repair attempt does raise the stakes, but that is handled by the detailed fix list and by validation plus an independent review, not by a stronger model."
|
|
}
|