Files
TheTree_mock/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/checkpoints/p13-03-start-r01/repair-commander.json
T

20 lines
3.7 KiB
JSON

{
"job_id": "660d977e161f404c923960edef78f263",
"state": "succeeded",
"project": "the-tree-p13-03",
"task_id": "P13-03",
"operation": "commander",
"created": 1791829920.111413,
"pid": 61581,
"started": 1791829920.1555462,
"exit_code": 0,
"result": {
"action": "request-repair",
"task_id": "P13-03",
"reason": "The worker's block was a false spec hash mismatch, not a spec defect. Runner core.py:54-58 registers the SHA256 of the git output after stdout.strip. The raw file hash (917cf150...) and the Runner text hash (e1255835...) are two valid representations of the same spec, and e1255835... matches the contract. The 6 source_pins inputs match the original checkout. Repair attempt 1 of 2 (cap unchanged). Resume the existing P13-03 only. Create no new task and change no Runner core. Do not change the spec, the contract, the acceptance denominator or the budget. Instructions to the worker: (1) Read execution/p13-03/P13_SPEC_HASH_CONTEXT.md, which is inside allowed_paths. Do not treat the 917cf150 vs e1255835 difference as a blocker. Verify the spec by the Runner text representation (stdout.strip) against e1255835..., and record both values. (2) Keep the 6 base source_pins unchanged. In the receipt, record the provenance of the base-time work_packages.json plan snapshot separately from the current root ledger, which is being updated to in_progress. (3) Still to do, none of it yet done: the difference record for all 7 original facilities; the usage-slot, non-facility and unknown-ID handling; the ledger md/json and validation.json; checker tools/check_p13_content_difference.py with negative checks for omission, stale pin, false content completion and technical-as-content promotion. (4) Formal validation p13-difference and a separate Claude review are still required before any integration. Records-only change, stdlib only, no edits outside allowed_paths. The worker does not self-confirm completion. The owner decides on main integration."
},
"finished": 1791829929.271523,
"stdout_tail": "{\n \"action\": \"request-repair\",\n \"task_id\": \"P13-03\",\n \"reason\": \"The worker's block was a false spec hash mismatch, not a spec defect. Runner core.py:54-58 registers the SHA256 of the git output after stdout.strip. The raw file hash (917cf150...) and the Runner text hash (e1255835...) are two valid representations of the same spec, and e1255835... matches the contract. The 6 source_pins inputs match the original checkout. Repair attempt 1 of 2 (cap unchanged). Resume the existing P13-03 only. Create no new task and change no Runner core. Do not change the spec, the contract, the acceptance denominator or the budget. Instructions to the worker: (1) Read execution/p13-03/P13_SPEC_HASH_CONTEXT.md, which is inside allowed_paths. Do not treat the 917cf150 vs e1255835 difference as a blocker. Verify the spec by the Runner text representation (stdout.strip) against e1255835..., and record both values. (2) Keep the 6 base source_pins unchanged. In the receipt, record the provenance of the base-time work_packages.json plan snapshot separately from the current root ledger, which is being updated to in_progress. (3) Still to do, none of it yet done: the difference record for all 7 original facilities; the usage-slot, non-facility and unknown-ID handling; the ledger md/json and validation.json; checker tools/check_p13_content_difference.py with negative checks for omission, stale pin, false content completion and technical-as-content promotion. (4) Formal validation p13-difference and a separate Claude review are still required before any integration. Records-only change, stdlib only, no edits outside allowed_paths. The worker does not self-confirm completion. The owner decides on main integration.\"\n}\n",
"stderr_tail": ""
}