Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
Agent Control Runner 65a4fe2bb8 Merge commit '6b78f8fd71131e61ba695939f4629fec9f51d7a9' into HEAD 2026-10-13 17:07:25 +09:00
Takeshi 15168ffd47 Reconcile mana proposal progress and pin arithmetic preflight 2026-10-13 17:06:46 +09:00
Agent Control Runner 6b78f8fd71 MP-01-r02: 承認用マナ契約候補の作成(原88成果の完了ではない) 2026-10-13 17:04:45 +09:00
Takeshi 231085cf29 Record authorized mana proposal repair and preserved artifact compression 2026-10-13 17:03:09 +09:00
Takeshi 25feff8852 Record P24 normal placement and modal preservation evidence 2026-10-13 16:36:07 +09:00
Takeshi 018ae7d6d7 Pin P24 old-slot preservation and exact restored snapshot evidence 2026-10-13 16:02:21 +09:00
Takeshi c11123f7ee Record P24 approved repair and normal OS evidence; preserve P18 review gaps 2026-10-13 15:43:03 +09:00
Takeshi a0f556e135 Preserve P18 native evidence and deliver recorded Opus repair direction 2026-10-13 14:34:06 +09:00
Takeshi c77639a9d7 Record Opus-selected Astra P18 implementation dispatch 2026-10-13 14:04:40 +09:00
Takeshi d2a1f80a61 Define P18 original relationship preservation code contract 2026-10-13 14:02:05 +09:00
Takeshi 70e76cd073 docs: correct original NTR onset and audit relationship prerequisites 2026-10-13 13:47:57 +09:00
Takeshi 88b9fe030b docs: store checked zero-context UI entry proposal 2026-10-13 13:30:25 +09:00
Takeshi 0a8d6025cd docs: pin actual P24-02 IME and cross-process label evidence 2026-10-13 13:28:38 +09:00
Takeshi 82f4ff69e3 docs: pin submitted P24-02 candidate and passing affected tests 2026-10-13 12:56:25 +09:00
Takeshi 6ea80613f8 docs: record P24-02 parse success and local observer failure 2026-10-13 12:50:23 +09:00
Takeshi dee23f2710 docs: retain full player guard outside review packet with verified compression 2026-10-13 12:40:53 +09:00
Takeshi 71390fd7f6 docs: record P24-02 GUI repair and guarded native preflight 2026-10-13 12:33:49 +09:00
Takeshi a791117e98 docs: pin model routing and current P24-02 acceptance gaps 2026-10-13 11:52:48 +09:00
Takeshi 020d6b014e Record P24-02 preserved work and concrete Runner execution repair 2026-10-13 10:59:18 +09:00
Takeshi a7a68be583 docs: record active single Antigravity P24-02 implementation 2026-10-13 09:47:57 +09:00
Takeshi 1a5abc6516 docs: freeze next P24-02 complete operations and notification acceptance 2026-10-13 09:45:20 +09:00
Takeshi b84c3499d1 docs: formally close P24-03 with reviewed integration and final evidence 2026-10-13 09:41:59 +09:00
Agent Control Runner 0a759f13ae Merge commit '4cefcff849d4dc1211caa5066e24bfae666cc2f4' into HEAD 2026-10-13 09:36:08 +09:00
Takeshi 41a5acbd43 test: complete Runner support and independent P24 acceptance evidence 2026-10-13 09:35:52 +09:00
Takeshi acc0df7ee2 test: retain exact Runner validation and P24 packet preservation evidence 2026-10-13 09:25:31 +09:00
Takeshi 8001b11558 docs: resume authorized P24 closure without redundant approval wait 2026-10-13 09:08:06 +09:00
Takeshi 6a7c032a4d docs: audit P24 packet proposal against exact blobs and malformed inputs 2026-10-13 08:58:51 +09:00
Takeshi 570f686e45 docs: hold unaccepted P13 repair and prioritize validated P24 closure 2026-10-13 08:53:46 +09:00
Takeshi e6e96d86d7 docs: record authorized isolated Runner repair and Claude auth dependency 2026-10-13 08:07:19 +09:00
Takeshi 231b3bd857 docs: preserve P08 feasibility without inventing construction values 2026-10-13 04:02:15 +09:00
Takeshi 256253343f docs: prove full-content P13 review packet dedup proposal 2026-10-13 03:57:29 +09:00
Takeshi e7aafdce39 docs: preserve final P13-03 records and scoped submission recovery proposal 2026-10-13 03:51:55 +09:00
Takeshi 5f766c5bf1 docs: preserve P13-03 gate failures and bounded final repair inputs 2026-10-13 03:45:23 +09:00
Takeshi 1f6c46d9f5 docs: start original P13-03 and preserve spec hash repair evidence 2026-10-13 03:33:42 +09:00
Takeshi e1a1651e15 docs: freeze original P13-03 content difference acceptance contract 2026-10-13 03:25:14 +09:00
Takeshi 470b8fe06c docs: record bounded D05 fee save and logistics diagnostic 2026-10-13 03:22:32 +09:00
Takeshi aec7a2e1ee docs: clarify unapproved mana arithmetic and furnace capacity options 2026-10-13 03:16:04 +09:00
Takeshi 52ee6bec9e docs: pin D05 daily boundary and paired elevator observations 2026-10-13 03:14:47 +09:00
Takeshi 3170e9c28a docs: preserve D05 diagnostic review and bounded followups 2026-10-13 03:10:12 +09:00
Takeshi c3e4c68b97 docs: trace D05 elevator rescue and purchase callbacks 2026-10-13 03:09:20 +09:00
Takeshi 149c302234 docs: trace D05 facility and emergency-stop scope 2026-10-13 03:07:22 +09:00
Takeshi 67d37c3e0b docs: draft unapproved D05 boundary decision options 2026-10-13 03:05:23 +09:00
Takeshi a257976ae2 docs: record P04 submitted preflight limits and failed acceptance 2026-10-13 03:02:18 +09:00
Takeshi 9444b43d3f docs: record final P04 repair protocol and input delivery 2026-10-13 02:55:37 +09:00
Takeshi 94642345b5 docs: preserve P04 audit and verified repair inputs 2026-10-13 02:48:14 +09:00
Takeshi d3ae1d227d docs: measure complete P24 reviewer packet under unchanged cap 2026-10-13 02:42:27 +09:00
Takeshi 7097eadf41 docs: record managed P04 audit start without acceptance credit 2026-10-13 02:39:15 +09:00
Takeshi deb1bcb237 docs: freeze P04 order audit inputs and original acceptance scope 2026-10-13 02:35:44 +09:00
Takeshi 339a118895 docs: retain updated planning validation pins 2026-10-13 02:30:08 +09:00
Takeshi 25467ac502 docs: record P24 exact-candidate validation and review proposal 2026-10-13 02:29:39 +09:00
Agent Control Runner 4cefcff849 P24-03: 選択と保存の受入 2026-10-13 01:20:44 +09:00
Agent Control Runner c2b8772e23 P24-03: 選択と保存の受入 2026-10-13 01:14:19 +09:00
Takeshi 243a3593bb docs: preserve P24 native failure and diagnostic evidence 2026-10-13 01:11:19 +09:00
Agent Control Runner 9c711860a8 P24-03: 選択と保存の受入 2026-10-13 00:57:32 +09:00
Takeshi 286730f88c docs: record P24 start and correct implementation role after read-only loop 2026-10-13 00:46:32 +09:00
Takeshi 9b2ee480a8 docs: freeze original P24-03 selection acceptance contract 2026-10-13 00:34:53 +09:00
Takeshi 4fb8312a33 docs: preserve unapproved mana proposal and independent review findings 2026-10-13 00:29:38 +09:00
Takeshi 5536bc0411 docs: freeze reuse-only repair contract for mana proposal 2026-10-13 00:19:30 +09:00
Takeshi 73cda6b867 docs: preserve unaccepted P06 audit and reconcile current status 2026-10-13 00:12:48 +09:00
Takeshi 0bdc4886cf docs: freeze owner-requested mana proposal contract 2026-10-13 00:06:47 +09:00
Takeshi 74fc69698a docs: record managed Claude decision and P06-01 audit dispatch 2026-10-12 23:45:56 +09:00
Takeshi dff514c774 docs: freeze original P06-01 contract and retained evidence for Runner 2026-10-12 23:39:00 +09:00
366 changed files with 38135 additions and 53 deletions
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
## 現在の成果と次対象(2026-10-13・P24-03完了→P24-02)
P24-03「選択と保存の受入」は提出4cefcff849d4dc1211caa5066e24bfae666cc2f4、最新main統合0a759f13aed03c05fd4a25ab4a2c26eefec94e3cで全7条件を正式完了。既存局所/全回帰/通常OS/同一保存の別プロセス再開証拠を再利用し、JSON版番号の正例17checksを追加。別Claude独立レビュー、最新main統合検証、最終検証、Runnercompleted/traceabilityまで成立。原30パッケージ/88成果単位、部分点なし。現在は正式10/着手22/予定56。全回帰173suite/14810checkやRunner支援の1件を成果数へ加算しない。
次に閉じる1件は既着手P24-02「操作と通知」。原建設・通知UX、既存通知ログ/viewport証拠とP24-03通常OS証拠を再利用し、配置・無効ドロップ・モーダル・停止再開・フキダシ/ログ/カットイン・クリック代替・日本語入力/表示倍率の不足を条件別に確認して必要な修正に限定する。実装者1名と別Claudeレビューを維持し、未知値を作らず、Windows実機が必要な条件だけを分離する。
Runner支援RP24-01は全51必須試験・実OS境界/通常フロー・追加資料保持検証・別Claudeレビュー・統合/最終検証を完了し、本番Runnerへ既存変更を保持して限定導入済み。3provider制限下doctorも合格。ユーザーの最新実行指示と既存main更新許可を適用し、不要な追加確認待ちを解除した。P13支援の未合格変更は未採用。P06値未承認、P23保持入力延期、同一Windows最終配布版受入等の全ゲーム残件は継続し、全体完了を認定しない。
証拠: [P24-03正式閉鎖](execution/p24-03-formal-closure-r01/closure.json)、[全条件の独立レビュー](execution/p24-03-formal-closure-r01/review.json)、[Runner支援の導入](checkpoints/p24-review-packet-proposal-r01/production-runner-adoption-r01/adoption.json)。以下の「現在」は記録時点の履歴。
## 現在のRunner実行(2026-10-12)
ユーザーがmain更新を明示許可し、現成果と原契約入力をmainへ反映済み。元の1成果単位P06-01を範囲とするRunner登録、3CLIの制限下認証確認、Claudeのrun判断、Codex1担当の監査起動まで進んだ。現在の次対象はP06-01。P22-03は必要数量/見積未確定、P23-02の追加性能修正は保留。正式9/着手21/予定58、全体30/88・部分点なし。Runnerの0/1はこの1件だけの運用表示で、全ゲーム分母ではない。証拠検証器は未実装/未実行で未受入。以下の未登録/main接続未解決/P22優先の記述は変更前履歴として保持する。
## 現在の実行順序変更(2026-10-12・ユーザー許可)
P23-02の追加性能修正を保留し、次の優先対象をP22-03「制作量と担当」に変更した。受入済P22-01の614利用記録を制作担当候補・数量入力・技術/内容作業・見積方法に対応させる下書きへ引継ぎ、独立レビューで一般従業員/客16件のSD制作分類を補正。必要数量・具体的見積は未確定で、正式完了は増やさない。現在は正式9/着手20/予定59、30パッケージ/88成果単位・部分点なし。
@@ -1716,7 +1730,7 @@ P00〜P29のIDを維持して過去記録との対応を保つ。各項目には
### P18 関係パラメータ 盾 確定遷移
現在地: 原本の関係3値と盾の全面接続は未着手。
現在地: P18-01の原本・旧5軸保存の照合とバックエンド契約準備に着手。Opus 5.5は保存移行の複雑さからAstraを選択。3値・盾の実接続、通常表示一致、承認済み初期値、検証・独立レビューは未受入。
統合前提: P03, P17。原本対応: B-7.1, B-7.2, B-7.3。
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
# D05 原7領域の有限判断ケース(未承認)
全7領域の比較用入力と期待関係を整理する。試験実施・合格・正式独立レビュー・原成果完了を意味しない。fixture値を本番値に転記しない。閉店/勤務/EVの選択は保留する。
## 1 closing
入力: At the boundary, an active service has one minute remaining.
候補・不変条件: Choice A permits completion only if power/staff/related-facility guards hold; B preserves progress and reservation without completion payment. Manual and scheduled closure scope must be specified.
## 2 power
入力: A service and boarded elevator pair exist when reserve reaches zero.
候補・不変条件: No work completion or sale caused by the stopped interval; preserve identity. Owner chooses safe landing exception versus cabin holding; no fabricated teleport destination.
## 3 destruction
入力: A scheduled destruction precedes the final service interval.
候補・不変条件: Destroyed instance cannot complete service; release owned reservation at most once; later power recovery must not undo destruction.
## 4 departure
入力: Departure and service final interval occur in one tick.
候補・不変条件: Define eligible active versus queued departure. One reservation has one consume or release result, no orphan and no double payment; do not invent a new paid-refund policy.
## 5 charging
入力: The same completion ID is replayed after save/resume.
候補・不変条件: Same payment identity must not add a second ledger transaction, wallet debit, consumed inventory or completion notification.
## 6 shift
入力: Day staff leaves at 18:00 and night staff is not yet physically present.
候補・不変条件: Choice A settles the actual preceding interval then forbids new work without night attendance; B applies shift removal first and holds progress. No stale daytime attendance may start new work.
## 7 midnight
入力: A paid service reaches completion at 00:00 after the daily-close phase.
候補・不変条件: Under observed ordering, closed period excludes the sale timestamp and next-day ledger contains it once. Any changed ordering needs explicit approval; same daily-close ID may not settle payroll/upkeep twice.
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
# D05 同時発生と安全処理:未承認候補
状態は not_approval_ready。原P04-01未完、原30パッケージ/88成果・部分点なしを維持する。これは判断用の草案で、承認・製品変更・修正上限追加・別タスク再登録を行わない。金額、マナ量、猶予時間を新設しない。
原本BASELINE.txt64/67は18:00交代と06:00–18:00/18:00–06:00の勤務枠、71/72は00:00決算、183はマナ枯渇時の全館停止。A01の保有時間按分維持費・00:00精算・未払い繰越は承認済みで、再確認対象ではない。閉店後の開始済サービスや最終勤務区間の意味は原本値として補わない。
## 現在の観測
kernel123–153はcommand適用→時計増分/日境界→TIME_BOUNDARIES→MANA→建設→物流→施設完了→生理→事故/イベント→施設queue→AI→公開。同phase内はhandler ID順。Runtime8421では施設/厨房進行、8441では閉店queue解放後patience、8597では勤務/通勤/出勤投影/清掃と客再計画。FacilityService853以降は非稼働・停電・不足人員を確認して休止/待機/失敗を処理する。この順序の観測自体を承認規約とはしない。
## 判断候補1:閉店と開始済サービス
A(継続契約案): 閉店を新規受付・待ち列の終了と区別し、開始済サービスは完了まで継続可能とする。ただし停電・破壊・必要人員不足等の停止を無効にしない。営業時間終了とプレイヤーの手動閉店を同じ扱いにするかは別に確定する。開始済契約を窓口の閉店だけで失敗させない利点があるが、閉店後も資源・人員が必要になる。
B(境界休止案): 営業終了を完了処理より先に反映し、開始済サービスを進捗/人物/予約保持のまま休止する。営業復帰時に再開し、未完了のサービス完了課金をしない。閉店直前に始めた長時間サービスの滞在が翌営業時間まで延びるため、宿泊等の適用例外と人物退出との衝突を承認前に整理する。
どちらも原本に明示された既存規約とは主張しない。定義ごとの営業時間・有償処理・手動閉店の現実装を照合してから推薦を決める。全施設へ一律に適用する案としては未完成。
## 判断候補2:18:00最終区間
A(区間完了案): [17:59,18:00)の実働が完了条件を満たしたサービスは18:00境界で一回完了できる。以後の新規受付/実働には夜番の実到着を必要とし、前の昼番の出勤投影を再利用しない。『18:00交代』と前区間の精算を分ける案。新規受付の前に勤務境界を反映する接続は、現コードでまだ証明されていない。
B(交代先行案): 18:00の勤務終了と出勤解除を施設完了判定より先に適用する。夜番が未到着ならサービスは待機し、前の投影による完了を許さない。18:00ちょうどに終わる予定でも人員不足の待機が起きる可能性があり、最終1分の意味を規約として明記する必要がある。
原本の通勤渋滞による業務停止を両案で維持する。勤務・通勤・給与・サービスを別々に時間更新して二重進行する実装は採らない。候補はsource変更ではない。
## 安全処理と残る照合
マナ枯渇では全館停止を維持し、未完了を完了として課金しない。復帰が破壊/摘発等の別停止理由を解除しないことを検証する。EV/搬送の現在位置、乗客/対象ID、荷物、予約、残作業を保存することを受入不変条件にするが、緊急降車するか・移動途中のどの位置で停止するかは現EV/救護/物流処理との照合前に確定しない。
費用時点は、既承認の費目をこの草案で動かさない。建設/仕入/給与/サービス/ワープ/炉取引等の対象を列挙し、承認済時点と未確定を分ける必要がある。サービス完了取引の再送/復元は同じidentityを再計上しない。00:00はA01を保持し、同時service売上を終了日のどちらへ所属させるかは現帳簿の期間・UI・保存を突合して候補を仕上げる。
## 承認前に揃える内容
1. 全サービス種別の営業時間終了/手動閉店/必要人員/完了課金を、既存定義と実関数に対応させる。
2. EV/救護/物流の停止位置と復帰、関連費目の既承認時点、日跨ぎ帰属を有限表で示す。
3. 各選択肢について原7領域の具体ケースと、進捗・予約・位置・人物・全台帳・通知の期待関係を示す。未承認の値をfixtureの数値で本番値にしない。
4. 独立した読取専用レビューを受け、未承認差異と影響を揃えてオーナーへ選択を提示する。
P04-01修正2/2は維持し、第3repair/再登録を始めない。現在のalways-fail preflightを完成受入gateとして採用しない。原規約の決定後も、生証拠・意味的来歴結合・全coverage・正式独立レビュー・統合が必要であり、規約承認だけで成果を完了にしない。
## 追加静的照合(現ソースの観測、未受入)
scope-audit.jsonに全施設定義と現default/明示値の区別を保存した。数値を承認値に格上げしていない。定義存在を通常登録・稼働・完成素材の証明としない。重複プロパティは記録だけ行い、この作業で修正しない。
閉店: FacilityInstance208/212は閉店をstateに反映し、can_start_service243はOPEN/DEGRADEDだけを開始可能にする。一方FacilityService853の開始済サービス準備には、閉店単独を理由にpauseする分岐がない。開始済は破壊/関連施設/電力/人員の条件で止まる。継続案Aと近い現動作であるが、全定義の通常動作を試験した結果ではない。
EV: ElevatorService287以降の停止は安全な降車先の有無で分岐する。降車先ありなら乗車中人物をemergency arrivalとしてそこへ返し、未乗車要求は取消。降車先なしなら乗車中は車内保持し待機要求を取消する。これを原本の承認済み安全規則とはしない。判断候補は「現安全降車分岐を保持」と「停電時は常に車内保持」の比較になり、乗客/救護同伴/搬送荷物への反映を確認する必要がある。枯渇時全館停止に安全降車例外を許すかは未承認の論点である。
00:00: OperationsCoordinator1125のpayloadは終了期間をend-exclusive、日別精算IDをdaily-close:<day>とする。TIME_BOUNDARIESが施設完了より先なのは現在の順序であり、帳簿帰属の全producer適合を証明していない。
## 境界処理の追加照合 r02
boundary-followup-r02.jsonに対象版のSHAと8関数の原文を固定した。決算APPLYは給与・維持費精算と期間財務の生成を行い、その関数本体には施設サービスの強制完了呼出しがない。FINALIZEという段階名だけから強制完了を推定しない。
確定財務は[start,end)を集計する。当日UIはcoordinatorの開始時刻から現在時刻までを含む現金流を表示し、確定日のsummaryは別に選択する。従って00:00ちょうどの完了売上の帰属は現順序と承認規約を区別して決める必要がある。給与は決算境界で現金記帳する一方、確定損益はnew_wages_totalを用いWAGE現金行を除外するため、UI現金支出と損益の数値を機械的に同値条件にしない。
EVのcancel_actorは乗車中の同伴組の単独取消を拒否する。停止時は同一の安全降車先について人物ごとのarrivalを生成し、Runtimeは人物ごとに位置を反映する。反映前提の欠損による分離は未再現であり、重大不具合として確定していない。通常操作・保存再開の受入を静的照合で代用しない。未承認・not_approval_ready・9/88は維持する。
## 費目・保存の追加照合 r03(正式受入ではない)
fees-save-followup-r03.jsonに15関数の原文・SHAを固定し、BOUNDARY_CASES.mdで原7領域の有限比較ケースを示した。別Claudeセッションの診断結果と採否はdiagnostic-review-r03.json/review-disposition-r03.jsonに保存した。
| 対象 | 観測した時点・保存 | 受入上の限界 |
|---|---|---|
| 建設費 | 工事job作成前の支払い。失敗時は資源と占有のrollback。 | job.created_atと支払minuteは別経路。通常経路での一致を未検証。 |
| 仕入費 | 倉庫在庫追加と同minuteの購入transfer。失敗時に原在庫・経済状態へ復元。 | 配送完了時の課金ではない。全原費目の承認時点を証明しない。 |
| サービス | 完了時のprice_snapshotとservice.payment.<id>。 | 閉店・勤務境界で完了資格を認める規約は未承認。 |
| 給与・維持費 | 決算境界の支払い。給与損益と現金支出は区別。A01維持費は既承認時点を維持。 | 今回の診断に既存全抜粋を再送していない。既存callsite/boundary資料を保持する。 |
| ワープ・炉 | 受入済みproducerへの対応未完。 | 時点・値を推測で設定しない。 |
| 経済保存 | entry・二重計上防止key・transaction ID・採番・時計を保存し、検証後に復元。 | 保存構造だけで別PID・同操作結果一致を証明しない。 |
| 決算保存 | coordinatorの日別summary・保留境界・処理分を保存。保留通知時はsnapshotを拒否。 | Runtime wrapperは有効coordinatorだけを含む。全パイプライン受入を残す。 |
物流tickは残量正の仕入れ条件の外でも呼ばれるが、実際の取出し・引渡しはallows_logisticsを確認する。同guardは手動営業・電力・耐久・休止・関連施設を確認し、営業時間区間を直接参照しない。したがってtick呼出しだけから停電中の配送完了を断定せず、逆にこのguardだけから搬送中人物の移動停止も断定しない。予定閉店の他経路への伝播を含む受入は未証明。
追加読取は既存goalの許可範囲で行う。診断の『読取にも別途許可が必要』という提案は採用しない。ただし第3repair、別登録による再試行、Runner core変更、D05採用は今回行わない。not_approval_ready・原7領域未完・9/88を維持する。
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
{
"status": "static_trace_only",
"source_head": "aec7a2e1ee2e21ea08d1ff0a673d8a490ef336d4",
"excerpts": [
{
"path": "scripts/economy/economy_service.gd",
"function": "create_snapshot",
"source_sha256": "95aedd0a0421c93e8fa39f0f76fa890cd0a46905d9a25c88c8b17c4d6d47728e",
"start_line": 605,
"end_line": 632,
"excerpt": "func create_snapshot() -> Dictionary:\n\tvar saved_accounts: Array[Dictionary] = []\n\tfor account_id: StringName in _sorted_string_name_keys(_accounts):\n\t\tvar definition: Dictionary = _accounts[account_id]\n\t\tsaved_accounts.append({\n\t\t\t&\"account_id\": String(account_id),\n\t\t\t&\"allow_negative\": bool(definition[&\"allow_negative\"]),\n\t\t\t&\"system\": bool(definition[&\"system\"]),\n\t\t})\n\tvar saved_entries: Array[Dictionary] = []\n\tfor entry: LedgerEntry in _ledger:\n\t\tsaved_entries.append(entry.to_dictionary())\n\tvar saved_idempotency: Array[Dictionary] = []\n\tfor key: StringName in _sorted_string_name_keys(_idempotency_keys):\n\t\tsaved_idempotency.append({\n\t\t\t&\"key\": String(key),\n\t\t\t&\"transaction_id\": String(_idempotency_keys[key]),\n\t\t})\n\treturn {\n\t\t&\"schema_version\": SNAPSHOT_VERSION,\n\t\t&\"current_minute\": current_minute,\n\t\t&\"next_transaction_sequence\": _next_transaction_sequence,\n\t\t&\"accounts\": saved_accounts,\n\t\t&\"entries\": saved_entries,\n\t\t&\"idempotency\": saved_idempotency,\n\t}\n\n\n"
},
{
"path": "scripts/economy/economy_service.gd",
"function": "restore_snapshot",
"source_sha256": "95aedd0a0421c93e8fa39f0f76fa890cd0a46905d9a25c88c8b17c4d6d47728e",
"start_line": 633,
"end_line": 715,
"excerpt": "func restore_snapshot(snapshot: Dictionary) -> bool:\n\tif int(snapshot.get(&\"schema_version\", snapshot.get(\"schema_version\", 0))) != SNAPSHOT_VERSION:\n\t\treturn false\n\tvar saved_accounts: Variant = snapshot.get(&\"accounts\", snapshot.get(\"accounts\", null))\n\tvar saved_entries: Variant = snapshot.get(&\"entries\", snapshot.get(\"entries\", null))\n\tvar saved_idempotency: Variant = snapshot.get(&\"idempotency\", snapshot.get(\"idempotency\", null))\n\tif not saved_accounts is Array or not saved_entries is Array or not saved_idempotency is Array:\n\t\treturn false\n\n\tvar restored_accounts: Dictionary = {}\n\tfor value: Variant in saved_accounts:\n\t\tif not value is Dictionary:\n\t\t\treturn false\n\t\tvar account_id := StringName(value.get(&\"account_id\", value.get(\"account_id\", \"\")))\n\t\tif account_id.is_empty() or restored_accounts.has(account_id):\n\t\t\treturn false\n\t\trestored_accounts[account_id] = {\n\t\t\t&\"allow_negative\": bool(value.get(&\"allow_negative\", value.get(\"allow_negative\", false))),\n\t\t\t&\"system\": bool(value.get(&\"system\", value.get(\"system\", false))),\n\t\t}\n\tif not restored_accounts.has(SYSTEM_SOURCE) or not restored_accounts.has(SYSTEM_SINK):\n\t\treturn false\n\tif not bool((restored_accounts[SYSTEM_SOURCE] as Dictionary)[&\"allow_negative\"]) \\\n\t\tor bool((restored_accounts[SYSTEM_SINK] as Dictionary)[&\"allow_negative\"]):\n\t\treturn false\n\tif not bool((restored_accounts[SYSTEM_SOURCE] as Dictionary)[&\"system\"]) \\\n\t\tor not bool((restored_accounts[SYSTEM_SINK] as Dictionary)[&\"system\"]):\n\t\treturn false\n\tfor account_id: Variant in restored_accounts:\n\t\tif account_id not in [SYSTEM_SOURCE, SYSTEM_SINK] \\\n\t\t\tand bool((restored_accounts[account_id] as Dictionary)[&\"system\"]):\n\t\t\treturn false\n\n\tvar restored_ledger: Array[LedgerEntry] = []\n\tfor value: Variant in saved_entries:\n\t\tif not value is Dictionary:\n\t\t\treturn false\n\t\trestored_ledger.append(LedgerEntryType.from_dictionary(value))\n\n\tvar restored_idempotency: Dictionary = {}\n\tvar idempotent_transactions: Dictionary = {}\n\tfor value: Variant in saved_idempotency:\n\t\tif not value is Dictionary:\n\t\t\treturn false\n\t\tvar key := StringName(value.get(&\"key\", value.get(\"key\", \"\")))\n\t\tvar transaction_id := StringName(value.get(\n\t\t\t&\"transaction_id\",\n\t\t\tvalue.get(\"transaction_id\", \"\")\n\t\t))\n\t\tif key.is_empty() or transaction_id.is_empty() \\\n\t\t\tor restored_idempotency.has(key) or idempotent_transactions.has(transaction_id):\n\t\t\treturn false\n\t\trestored_idempotency[key] = transaction_id\n\t\tidempotent_transactions[transaction_id] = true\n\n\tvar calculated := _calculate_and_validate(\n\t\trestored_accounts,\n\t\trestored_ledger,\n\t\trestored_idempotency\n\t)\n\tif not (calculated[&\"errors\"] as Array).is_empty():\n\t\treturn false\n\tvar restored_transactions: Dictionary = calculated[&\"transactions\"]\n\tvar next_sequence := int(snapshot.get(\n\t\t&\"next_transaction_sequence\",\n\t\tsnapshot.get(\"next_transaction_sequence\", 0)\n\t))\n\tvar restored_minute := int(snapshot.get(&\"current_minute\", snapshot.get(\"current_minute\", -1)))\n\tif next_sequence < 1 or restored_minute < 0:\n\t\treturn false\n\n\t# Atomic swap: live fields are untouched until every saved value is valid.\n\t_accounts = restored_accounts\n\t_ledger = restored_ledger\n\t_idempotency_keys = restored_idempotency\n\t_transaction_ids = restored_transactions\n\t_balance_cache = (calculated[&\"balances\"] as Dictionary).duplicate(true)\n\t_next_transaction_sequence = next_sequence\n\t_pending_transaction_notifications.clear()\n\tcurrent_minute = restored_minute\n\treturn true\n\n\n"
},
{
"path": "scripts/operations/operations_coordinator.gd",
"function": "create_snapshot",
"source_sha256": "871a248ee101b6df543fd5cf0440b5d4b0f02c21fa145a99f0687888c1bc6f90",
"start_line": 620,
"end_line": 712,
"excerpt": "func create_snapshot() -> Dictionary:\n\tif not _initialization_valid:\n\t\tlast_error = \"Operations coordinator initialization is invalid.\"\n\t\treturn {}\n\tif _notification_delivery_deferred or not _notification_queue.is_empty():\n\t\tlast_error = \"Deferred Operations notifications must be resolved before snapshotting.\"\n\t\treturn {}\n\tvar field_cache: Dictionary = {}\n\tvar internal_report := _snapshot_root_report({\n\t\t&\"config\": _config,\n\t\t&\"demand_profiles\": _demand_profiles,\n\t\t&\"arrival_carry\": _arrival_carry,\n\t\t&\"demand_history\": _demand_history,\n\t\t&\"arrival_reports\": _arrival_reports,\n\t\t&\"day_summaries\": _day_summaries,\n\t\t&\"morning_reports\": _morning_reports,\n\t\t&\"alerts\": _alerts,\n\t\t&\"quarantine_report\": _quarantine_report,\n\t}, field_cache, true)\n\tvar shape_error := _internal_snapshot_shape_error()\n\tif not bool(internal_report[&\"ok\"]) or not shape_error.is_empty():\n\t\tlast_error = \"Operations state cannot be serialized: %s\" % [\n\t\t\tinternal_report[&\"code\"] if not bool(internal_report[&\"ok\"]) else shape_error\n\t\t]\n\t\treturn {}\n\tvar saved_profiles: Array[Dictionary] = []\n\tvar saved_carry: Array[Dictionary] = []\n\tfor key: String in _sorted_string_keys(_demand_profiles):\n\t\tvar profile: Dictionary = _demand_profiles[key]\n\t\tsaved_profiles.append({\n\t\t\t&\"facility_tag\": String(profile[&\"facility_tag\"]),\n\t\t\t&\"guest_class\": String(profile[&\"guest_class\"]),\n\t\t\t&\"time_band\": String(profile[&\"time_band\"]),\n\t\t\t&\"components\": _string_key_dictionary(profile[&\"components\"]),\n\t\t\t&\"demand_index\": int(profile[&\"demand_index\"]),\n\t\t\t&\"last_evaluated_at\": int(profile[&\"last_evaluated_at\"]),\n\t\t})\n\t\tsaved_carry.append({\n\t\t\t&\"facility_tag\": String(profile[&\"facility_tag\"]),\n\t\t\t&\"guest_class\": String(profile[&\"guest_class\"]),\n\t\t\t&\"time_band\": String(profile[&\"time_band\"]),\n\t\t\t&\"numerator\": int(_arrival_carry.get(key, 0)),\n\t\t})\n\n\tvar saved_mornings: Array[Dictionary] = []\n\tfor day: int in _sorted_int_keys(_morning_reports):\n\t\tsaved_mornings.append(_morning_reports[day])\n\tvar saved_days: Array[Dictionary] = []\n\tfor day: int in _sorted_int_keys(_day_summaries):\n\t\tsaved_days.append(_day_summaries[day])\n\n\t# These borrowed containers never leave this synchronous method. The final\n\t# canonical conversion recursively creates owned dictionaries and arrays.\n\tvar raw_snapshot := {\n\t\t&\"schema_version\": SNAPSHOT_VERSION,\n\t\t&\"legacy_calendar_last_day\": _legacy_calendar_last_day,\n\t\t&\"legacy_history_last_day\": _legacy_history_last_day,\n\t\t&\"legacy_principal_profit_last_day\": _legacy_principal_profit_last_day,\n\t\t&\"origin_minute\": _origin_minute,\n\t\t&\"current_minute\": current_minute,\n\t\t&\"config\": _string_key_dictionary(_config),\n\t\t&\"demand_profiles\": saved_profiles,\n\t\t&\"arrival_carry\": saved_carry,\n\t\t&\"demand_history\": _demand_history,\n\t\t&\"arrival_reports\": _arrival_reports,\n\t\t&\"day_summaries\": saved_days,\n\t\t&\"morning_reports\": saved_mornings,\n\t\t&\"alerts\": _alerts,\n\t\t&\"processed_demand_minutes\": _sorted_int_keys(_processed_demand_minutes),\n\t\t&\"processed_arrival_minutes\": _sorted_int_keys(_processed_arrival_minutes),\n\t\t&\"population_count\": _population_count,\n\t\t&\"arrears_total\": _arrears_total,\n\t\t&\"consecutive_insolvency_count\": _consecutive_insolvency_count,\n\t\t&\"terminal_state\": String(_terminal_state),\n\t\t&\"pause_requested\": pause_requested,\n\t\t&\"next_arrival_plan_sequence\": _next_arrival_plan_sequence,\n\t\t&\"next_guest_sequence\": _next_guest_sequence,\n\t\t&\"arrival_plan_high_water\": _arrival_plan_high_water,\n\t\t&\"guest_high_water\": _guest_high_water,\n\t\t&\"fair_rotation_counter\": _fair_rotation_counter,\n\t\t&\"pending_boundary_minute\": _pending_boundary_minute,\n\t\t&\"deferred_boundary_minute\": _deferred_boundary_minute,\n\t\t&\"pause_reason\": String(_pause_reason),\n\t\t&\"external_quarantined\": _external_quarantined,\n\t\t&\"quarantine_report\": _quarantine_report,\n\t}\n\tvar tree_report := _snapshot_root_report(raw_snapshot, field_cache, false)\n\tif not bool(tree_report[&\"ok\"]):\n\t\tlast_error = \"Operations state cannot be serialized: %s\" % tree_report[&\"code\"]\n\t\treturn {}\n\treturn tree_report[&\"value\"]\n\n\n"
},
{
"path": "autoload/simulation_runtime.gd",
"function": "_create_operations_runtime_snapshot",
"source_sha256": "d52a995ae715542bbc550f68d35889540658275d12e04ae0b21ac276f5843f39",
"start_line": 3181,
"end_line": 3195,
"excerpt": "func _create_operations_runtime_snapshot() -> Dictionary:\n\treturn {\n\t\t&\"wrapper_version\": OPERATIONS_RUNTIME_WRAPPER_VERSION,\n\t\t&\"enabled\": _operations_enabled,\n\t\t&\"personal_action_points\": _personal_action_points,\n\t\t&\"runtime_failure_latched\": _operations_runtime_failure_latched,\n\t\t&\"runtime_failure_report\": _operations_runtime_failure_report.duplicate(true),\n\t\t&\"deferred_runtime_minute\": _operations_deferred_runtime_minute,\n\t\t&\"coordinator\": (\n\t\t\toperations_coordinator.create_snapshot()\n\t\t\tif _operations_enabled and operations_coordinator != null else {}\n\t\t),\n\t}\n\n\n"
},
{
"path": "scripts/construction/construction_service.gd",
"function": "start_construction",
"source_sha256": "c737eb7aa927097da677ac23ad649ef871af1dea54bcb8103348b88c5303ea25",
"start_line": 111,
"end_line": 186,
"excerpt": "func start_construction(\n\tdefinition: Variant,\n\torigin: Vector3i,\n\trotation: int = 0,\n\tbuild_minutes: int = 0,\n\tcreated_at: int = -1\n) -> CommandResult:\n\tif not _mutation_allowed():\n\t\treturn _unavailable_result()\n\tif _jobs.size() >= MAX_JOBS or _next_job_sequence > MAX_SEQUENCE:\n\t\treturn _failure(\"CONSTRUCTION_LIMIT\", \"Construction job capacity has been reached.\")\n\tif build_minutes > MAX_BUILD_MINUTES:\n\t\treturn _failure(\"INVALID_BUILD_TIME\", \"Construction build time exceeds the supported limit.\")\n\t_mutation_in_progress = true\n\tvar report := validate_placement(definition, origin, rotation)\n\tif not report.can_build:\n\t\t_mutation_in_progress = false\n\t\treturn _failure(\"INVALID_PLACEMENT\", \"Facility placement is invalid.\", {\n\t\t\t&\"placement_report\": report.to_dictionary(),\n\t\t})\n\n\tvar job_id := StringName(\"construction_%08d\" % _next_job_sequence)\n\tvar resource_snapshot: Variant = _capture_resource_state()\n\tvar world_snapshot := _capture_world_state(report.cells)\n\tif not _spend_cost(report.total_cost):\n\t\tvar payment_rolled_back := _restore_resource_state(resource_snapshot)\n\t\t_mutation_in_progress = false\n\t\tif not payment_rolled_back:\n\t\t\t_quarantine(\"Construction payment failed after mutating resources and could not be rolled back.\")\n\t\treturn _failure(\"PAYMENT_FAILED\", \"Construction resources changed before the command was applied.\", {\n\t\t\t&\"cost\": report.total_cost.duplicate(true),\n\t\t\t&\"rolled_back\": payment_rolled_back,\n\t\t\t&\"rollback_failed\": not payment_rolled_back,\n\t\t})\n\n\tif not _world_occupy(report.cells, job_id, &\"construction\"):\n\t\tvar world_rolled_back := _restore_world_state(world_snapshot)\n\t\tvar resources_rolled_back := _restore_resource_state(resource_snapshot)\n\t\tvar rolled_back := world_rolled_back and resources_rolled_back\n\t\t_mutation_in_progress = false\n\t\tif not rolled_back:\n\t\t\t_quarantine(\"Construction reservation failed and transaction rollback was incomplete.\")\n\t\treturn _failure(\"RESERVATION_FAILED\", \"World reservation failed.\", {\n\t\t\t&\"job_id\": job_id,\n\t\t\t&\"rolled_back\": rolled_back,\n\t\t\t&\"rollback_failed\": not rolled_back,\n\t\t\t&\"world_rolled_back\": world_rolled_back,\n\t\t\t&\"resources_rolled_back\": resources_rolled_back,\n\t\t})\n\n\tvar effective_minutes := build_minutes if build_minutes > 0 else report.build_time\n\tvar effective_created_at := current_minute if created_at < 0 else created_at\n\tvar definition_id := StringName(_definition_value(definition, &\"id\", &\"\"))\n\tvar expected_layer := int(_definition_value(definition, &\"layer\", origin.z))\n\tvar job := ConstructionJobType.new().configure(\n\t\tjob_id,\n\t\tdefinition_id,\n\t\torigin,\n\t\trotation,\n\t\texpected_layer,\n\t\treport.cells,\n\t\treport.total_cost,\n\t\teffective_minutes,\n\t\teffective_created_at\n\t)\n\t_jobs[job_id] = job\n\t_last_progress_minutes[job_id] = -1\n\t_next_job_sequence += 1\n\t_mutation_in_progress = false\n\tjob_created.emit(job)\n\treturn CommandResultType.succeeded(0, {\n\t\t&\"job_id\": job_id,\n\t\t&\"placement_report\": report.to_dictionary(),\n\t})\n\n\n"
},
{
"path": "scripts/economy/ledger_backed_resource_state.gd",
"function": "apply_resource_deltas",
"source_sha256": "199442c566185dc0abcc4eea5b4cf59c07330731bb5d5038b605dd801ae0209b",
"start_line": 60,
"end_line": 101,
"excerpt": "func apply_resource_deltas(deltas: Dictionary) -> bool:\n\tif not _validate_deltas(deltas):\n\t\treturn false\n\tvar before := create_snapshot()\n\tvar non_gold: Dictionary = {}\n\tvar gold_delta := 0\n\tfor raw_name: Variant in deltas:\n\t\tvar resource_name := StringName(raw_name)\n\t\tif resource_name == &\"gold\":\n\t\t\tgold_delta += int(deltas[raw_name])\n\t\telse:\n\t\t\tnon_gold[resource_name] = int(deltas[raw_name])\n\tif not non_gold.is_empty() and not bool(_state.call(&\"apply_resource_deltas\", non_gold)):\n\t\treturn false\n\n\tif gold_delta != 0:\n\t\tvar result: CommandResult\n\t\tif gold_delta < 0:\n\t\t\tresult = _economy.transfer(\n\t\t\t\tPLAYER_CASH,\n\t\t\t\t_counter_account,\n\t\t\t\t-gold_delta,\n\t\t\t\t_current_minute(),\n\t\t\t\t_expense_category,\n\t\t\t\t_source_entity_id\n\t\t\t)\n\t\telse:\n\t\t\tresult = _economy.transfer(\n\t\t\t\t_counter_account,\n\t\t\t\tPLAYER_CASH,\n\t\t\t\tgold_delta,\n\t\t\t\t_current_minute(),\n\t\t\t\t_refund_category,\n\t\t\t\t_source_entity_id\n\t\t\t)\n\t\tif not result.is_success():\n\t\t\trestore_snapshot(before)\n\t\t\treturn false\n\t_sync_gold_mirror()\n\treturn true\n\n\n"
},
{
"path": "scripts/economy/ledger_backed_resource_state.gd",
"function": "_current_minute",
"source_sha256": "199442c566185dc0abcc4eea5b4cf59c07330731bb5d5038b605dd801ae0209b",
"start_line": 143,
"end_line": 146,
"excerpt": "func _current_minute() -> int:\n\tif _minute_provider.is_valid():\n\t\treturn maxi(int(_minute_provider.call()), 0)\n\treturn _economy.current_minute\n"
},
{
"path": "scripts/supply/supply_management_service.gd",
"function": "_purchase_paid",
"source_sha256": "e4ad420191020485c027004f64bb00fad9da195fe956ef10dc0c787412018f7f",
"start_line": 83,
"end_line": 126,
"excerpt": "func _purchase_paid(runtime: Variant, warehouse_id: StringName, item_id: StringName,\n\tquantity: int, minute: int, ledger_key: StringName, command_id: int = 0, record_auto_attempt: bool = false) -> CommandResult:\n\t# Shared transaction only; internal replenishment does not enqueue a command.\n\tvar quote := preview_purchase(runtime, warehouse_id, item_id, quantity)\n\tif not bool(quote[&\"ok\"]):\n\t\treturn _purchase_failure(command_id, StringName(quote[&\"reason\"]), quote)\n\tvar facility: FacilityInstance = runtime.facility_service.get_instance(warehouse_id)\n\tvar item := SupplyCatalog.get_item(item_id)\n\tvar inventory_before: Dictionary = runtime.inventory_service.create_snapshot()\n\tvar economy_before: Dictionary = runtime.economy_service.create_snapshot()\n\tvar plans_before: Dictionary = runtime.auto_purchase_plans.create_snapshot() if record_auto_attempt else {}\n\tvar stocked: Dictionary = runtime.inventory_service.add_stack(facility.local_inventory_id, item_id, quantity, 100, minute + int(item[&\"shelf_life_minutes\"]), minute, int(item[&\"unit_weight\"]))\n\tif not bool(stocked.get(&\"ok\", false)):\n\t\truntime.inventory_service.restore_snapshot(inventory_before)\n\t\truntime.economy_service.restore_snapshot(economy_before)\n\t\treturn _purchase_failure(command_id, &\"INVENTORY_ERROR\")\n\tvar memo: StringName = SupplyAutoPurchasePlans.receipt_memo(item_id, quantity, int(item[&\"unit_price\"]), int(quote[&\"total_cost\"])) if record_auto_attempt else &\"supply_purchase\"\n\tif quote.has(&\"purchase_quote\"):\n\t\tmemo = PurchaseQuoteV2.receipt_memo(quote[&\"purchase_quote\"])\n\tvar paid: CommandResult = runtime.economy_service.transfer(&\"PLAYER_CASH\", runtime.OPERATING_EXPENSE_ACCOUNT, int(quote[&\"total_cost\"]), minute, &\"OPERATING_EXPENSE\", warehouse_id, ledger_key, memo, &\"\", false)\n\tif not paid.is_success():\n\t\truntime.inventory_service.restore_snapshot(inventory_before)\n\t\truntime.economy_service.restore_snapshot(economy_before)\n\t\treturn _purchase_failure(command_id, &\"PAYMENT_FAILED\")\n\tvar recorded := true\n\tif record_auto_attempt:\n\t\tif quote.has(&\"purchase_quote\"):\n\t\t\trecorded = runtime.auto_purchase_plans.record_attempt(warehouse_id, item_id, minute, CommandResult.succeeded(0, {&\"transaction_id\": paid.details[&\"transaction_id\"], &\"quantity\": quantity, &\"purchase_quote\": quote[&\"purchase_quote\"], &\"total_cost\": quote[&\"total_cost\"]}), runtime.economy_service)\n\t\telse:\n\t\t\trecorded = runtime.auto_purchase_plans.record_attempt(warehouse_id, item_id, minute, CommandResult.succeeded(0, {&\"transaction_id\": paid.details[&\"transaction_id\"], &\"quantity\": quantity, &\"unit_price\": item[&\"unit_price\"], &\"total_cost\": quote[&\"total_cost\"]}), runtime.economy_service)\n\tif not recorded:\n\t\truntime.inventory_service.restore_snapshot(inventory_before)\n\t\truntime.economy_service.restore_snapshot(economy_before)\n\t\treturn _purchase_failure(command_id, &\"PAYMENT_FAILED\")\n\tif not runtime.economy_service.commit_transaction_notification(StringName(paid.details[&\"transaction_id\"])):\n\t\truntime.inventory_service.restore_snapshot(inventory_before)\n\t\truntime.economy_service.restore_snapshot(economy_before)\n\t\tif record_auto_attempt:\n\t\t\truntime.auto_purchase_plans.restore_snapshot(plans_before, runtime.facility_service, runtime.economy_service, minute)\n\t\treturn _purchase_failure(command_id, &\"PAYMENT_FAILED\")\n\tquote.merge({&\"warehouse_id\": warehouse_id, &\"item_id\": item_id, &\"quantity\": quantity, &\"transaction_id\": paid.details[&\"transaction_id\"]})\n\treturn CommandResult.succeeded(command_id, quote)\n\n\n"
},
{
"path": "autoload/simulation_runtime.gd",
"function": "_advance_inventory_and_logistics",
"source_sha256": "d52a995ae715542bbc550f68d35889540658275d12e04ae0b21ac276f5843f39",
"start_line": 8411,
"end_line": 8420,
"excerpt": "func _advance_inventory_and_logistics(absolute_minute: int) -> void:\n\tif _operations_tick_blocked:\n\t\treturn\n\tinventory_service.current_minute = absolute_minute\n\tinventory_service.process_expired(absolute_minute, &\"inventory.waste\")\n\tif int(_state.get_resource(&\"mana\")) > 0:\n\t\tsupply_management.advance_auto_purchases(self, absolute_minute)\n\t\tsupply_management.ensure_deliveries(self, absolute_minute)\n\tsupply_logistics.tick(absolute_minute)\n\n"
},
{
"path": "scripts/supply/supply_logistics_bridge.gd",
"function": "tick",
"source_sha256": "b9e394af788595d2744b71f1907c8e7c3d762d38ff49992b1ee74e63b9639e80",
"start_line": 43,
"end_line": 103,
"excerpt": "func tick(absolute_minute: int) -> Dictionary:\n\tif _runtime == null:\n\t\treturn {&\"ok\": false, &\"reason\": &\"NOT_CONFIGURED\"}\n\tvar actions: Array[Dictionary] = []\n\tfor request_id: StringName in _request_ids(_runtime.logistics_requests):\n\t\tvar request: LogisticsRequest = _runtime.logistics_requests[request_id]\n\t\tif request.is_terminal():\n\t\t\tcontinue\n\t\tif request.state == LogisticsRequest.State.BLOCKED:\n\t\t\tif absolute_minute >= request.state_changed_at + RETRY_MINUTES:\n\t\t\t\t_rearm(request, absolute_minute)\n\t\t\tcontinue\n\t\tif request.state == LogisticsRequest.State.RESERVED:\n\t\t\tif not _reserved_stock_valid(request):\n\t\t\t\t_block_before_pickup(request, \"SOURCE_STOCK_EXPIRED\", absolute_minute)\n\t\t\telse:\n\t\t\t\t_dispatch(request, absolute_minute)\n\t\t\tcontinue\n\t\tvar task := _active_task(_runtime.staff_service, request.request_id)\n\t\tvar staff: StaffRuntime = _runtime.staff_service.get_staff(request.assigned_carrier_id)\n\t\tif task == null or staff == null or staff.current_task_id != task.task_id:\n\t\t\trequest.state_reason = \"CARRIER_TASK_MISSING\"\n\t\t\tcontinue\n\t\tif request.state == LogisticsRequest.State.DELIVERING and _cargo_quantities(_runtime.inventory_service, _cargo_id(staff.staff_id)).is_empty():\n\t\t\t_cancel_empty_cargo(request, staff, task, \"CARGO_EXPIRED\", absolute_minute)\n\t\t\tcontinue\n\t\tif not staff.can_take_shift():\n\t\t\tif request.state in [LogisticsRequest.State.ASSIGNED, LogisticsRequest.State.PICKING_UP]:\n\t\t\t\t_block_before_pickup(request, \"CARRIER_UNAVAILABLE\", absolute_minute)\n\t\t\telse:\n\t\t\t\trequest.state_reason = \"CARRIER_UNAVAILABLE\"\n\t\t\tcontinue\n\t\tif request.state in [LogisticsRequest.State.ASSIGNED, LogisticsRequest.State.PICKING_UP]:\n\t\t\tif not _reserved_stock_valid(request):\n\t\t\t\t_block_before_pickup(request, \"SOURCE_STOCK_EXPIRED\", absolute_minute)\n\t\t\telif _arrived_for_work(staff, task, absolute_minute):\n\t\t\t\tif _pickup(request, staff, task, absolute_minute):\n\t\t\t\t\tactions.append({&\"request_id\": request_id, &\"action\": &\"PICKED_UP\"})\n\t\telif request.state == LogisticsRequest.State.DELIVERING:\n\t\t\tvar cargo := _cargo_quantities(_runtime.inventory_service, _cargo_id(staff.staff_id))\n\t\t\tif cargo.is_empty():\n\t\t\t\t_cancel_empty_cargo(request, staff, task, \"CARGO_EXPIRED\", absolute_minute)\n\t\t\t\tcontinue\n\t\t\tif not _quantities_cover(cargo, request.item_requirements) and task.task_type != RETURN_TYPE:\n\t\t\t\tvar source := _facility_for_inventory(_runtime.facility_service, request.source_inventory_id)\n\t\t\t\tvar route := _access_path(staff.current_cell, source)\n\t\t\t\tif not bool(route.get(&\"reachable\", false)):\n\t\t\t\t\trequest.state_reason = \"EXPIRED_CARGO_RETURN_BLOCKED\"\n\t\t\t\t\tcontinue\n\t\t\t\tif not _runtime.staff_service.retarget_external_task(task.task_id, route[&\"cell\"], absolute_minute).is_success():\n\t\t\t\t\tcontinue\n\t\t\t\ttask.task_type = RETURN_TYPE\n\t\t\t\trequest.state_reason = RETURNING\n\t\t\t\tcontinue\n\t\t\tif _arrived_for_work(staff, task, absolute_minute):\n\t\t\t\tif _deliver(request, staff, task, absolute_minute):\n\t\t\t\t\tactions.append({&\"request_id\": request_id, &\"action\": &\"DELIVERED\"})\n\tlast_report = {&\"ok\": true, &\"actions\": actions}\n\treturn last_report.duplicate(true)\n\n\n"
},
{
"path": "scripts/supply/supply_logistics_bridge.gd",
"function": "_pickup",
"source_sha256": "b9e394af788595d2744b71f1907c8e7c3d762d38ff49992b1ee74e63b9639e80",
"start_line": 215,
"end_line": 245,
"excerpt": "func _pickup(request: LogisticsRequest, staff: StaffRuntime, task: StaffTask, minute: int) -> bool:\n\tvar source := _facility_for_inventory(_runtime.facility_service, request.source_inventory_id)\n\tif source == null or not _cell_touches_facility(staff.current_cell, source):\n\t\treturn _block_before_pickup(request, \"INVALID_PICKUP_ACCESS\", minute) and false\n\tif not source.allows_logistics():\n\t\treturn _block_before_pickup(request, \"SOURCE_CLOSED\", minute) and false\n\tvar destination := _facility_for_inventory(_runtime.facility_service, request.destination_inventory_id)\n\tif destination == null or not destination.allows_logistics() or not _has_storage_space(destination, request.total_weight):\n\t\treturn _block_before_pickup(request, \"DESTINATION_FULL_OR_CLOSED\", minute) and false\n\tvar route := _access_path(staff.current_cell, destination)\n\tif not bool(route.get(&\"reachable\", false)):\n\t\treturn _block_before_pickup(request, \"NO_DELIVERY_ROUTE\", minute) and false\n\tvar before := _capture(request)\n\tif request.state == LogisticsRequest.State.ASSIGNED and not _advance_request(request, minute):\n\t\t_rollback(request, before)\n\t\treturn false\n\tif not _advance_request(request, minute):\n\t\t_rollback(request, before)\n\t\treturn _block_before_pickup(request, \"PICKUP_FAILED\", minute) and false\n\tif not _runtime.staff_service.progress_task(task.task_id, 1, minute, true).is_success():\n\t\t_rollback(request, before)\n\t\treturn false\n\tstaff.carried_inventory_id = _cargo_id(staff.staff_id)\n\tvar delivery := _create_task(request, DELIVERY_TYPE, route[&\"cell\"], minute)\n\tif delivery == null or not _runtime.staff_service.assign_task_to_staff(delivery.task_id, staff.staff_id, minute).is_success():\n\t\t_rollback(request, before)\n\t\treturn false\n\trequest.state_reason = \"\"\n\treturn true\n\n\n"
},
{
"path": "scripts/supply/supply_logistics_bridge.gd",
"function": "_deliver",
"source_sha256": "b9e394af788595d2744b71f1907c8e7c3d762d38ff49992b1ee74e63b9639e80",
"start_line": 246,
"end_line": 280,
"excerpt": "func _deliver(request: LogisticsRequest, staff: StaffRuntime, task: StaffTask, minute: int) -> bool:\n\tvar returning := task.task_type == RETURN_TYPE\n\tvar destination_id := request.source_inventory_id if returning else request.destination_inventory_id\n\tvar destination := _facility_for_inventory(_runtime.facility_service, destination_id)\n\tif destination == null or not _cell_touches_facility(staff.current_cell, destination):\n\t\trequest.state_reason = \"INVALID_DELIVERY_ACCESS\"\n\t\treturn false\n\tvar quantities := _cargo_quantities(_runtime.inventory_service, _cargo_id(staff.staff_id))\n\tif destination == null or not destination.allows_logistics() or not _has_storage_space(destination, SupplyCatalog.inventory_weight(_runtime.inventory_service, _cargo_id(staff.staff_id))):\n\t\tif not returning:\n\t\t\trequest.state_reason = \"DESTINATION_FULL\"\n\t\treturn false\n\tvar before := _capture(request)\n\tif returning:\n\t\tvar transfers: Array[Dictionary] = []\n\t\tfor item_id: StringName in _sorted_keys(quantities):\n\t\t\ttransfers.append({&\"source_inventory_id\": _cargo_id(staff.staff_id), &\"destination_inventory_id\": destination_id,\n\t\t\t\t&\"item_id\": item_id, &\"quantity\": int(quantities[item_id]), &\"operation_id\": StringName(\"supply.return.%s.%s\" % [request.request_id, item_id])})\n\t\tif not _runtime.inventory_service.transfer_available_batch(transfers, minute)[&\"ok\"] \\\n\t\t\tor not _runtime.logistics_dispatcher.release_assignment_for_request(request.request_id, staff.staff_id, request.total_weight):\n\t\t\t_rollback(request, before)\n\t\t\treturn false\n\t\trequest.cancel(\"CARGO_EXPIRED_RETURNED\", minute)\n\telse:\n\t\tif not _advance_request(request, minute):\n\t\t\t_rollback(request, before)\n\t\t\trequest.state_reason = \"DELIVERY_RETRY\"\n\t\t\treturn false\n\tif not _runtime.staff_service.progress_task(task.task_id, 1, minute, true).is_success():\n\t\t_rollback(request, before)\n\t\treturn false\n\tstaff.carried_inventory_id = &\"\"\n\treturn true\n\n\n"
},
{
"path": "scripts/facility/facility_instance.gd",
"function": "allows_logistics",
"source_sha256": "0c6aa493f3299611e05dd26aa429dda8cf7b5c479e4d09632036fb862f79a324",
"start_line": 248,
"end_line": 251,
"excerpt": "func allows_logistics() -> bool:\n\treturn operator_open and power_available and durability > 0 and suspension_reason.is_empty() and related_facility_operating\n\n\n"
},
{
"path": "scripts/economy/ledger_backed_resource_state.gd",
"function": "create_snapshot",
"source_sha256": "199442c566185dc0abcc4eea5b4cf59c07330731bb5d5038b605dd801ae0209b",
"start_line": 102,
"end_line": 108,
"excerpt": "func create_snapshot() -> Dictionary:\n\treturn {\n\t\t&\"state\": _state.call(&\"create_snapshot\"),\n\t\t&\"economy\": _economy.create_snapshot(),\n\t}\n\n\n"
},
{
"path": "scripts/economy/ledger_backed_resource_state.gd",
"function": "restore_snapshot",
"source_sha256": "199442c566185dc0abcc4eea5b4cf59c07330731bb5d5038b605dd801ae0209b",
"start_line": 109,
"end_line": 127,
"excerpt": "func restore_snapshot(snapshot: Dictionary) -> bool:\n\tif not snapshot.get(&\"state\", null) is Dictionary \\\n\t\tor not snapshot.get(&\"economy\", null) is Dictionary:\n\t\treturn false\n\tvar previous_state: Dictionary = _state.call(&\"create_snapshot\")\n\tvar previous_economy: Dictionary = _economy.create_snapshot()\n\tif not _economy.restore_snapshot(snapshot[&\"economy\"]):\n\t\treturn false\n\tif not bool(_state.call(&\"restore_snapshot\", snapshot[&\"state\"])):\n\t\t_economy.restore_snapshot(previous_economy)\n\t\t_state.call(&\"restore_snapshot\", previous_state)\n\t\treturn false\n\tif int(_state.call(&\"get_resource\", &\"gold\")) != _economy.get_balance(PLAYER_CASH):\n\t\t_economy.restore_snapshot(previous_economy)\n\t\t_state.call(&\"restore_snapshot\", previous_state)\n\t\treturn false\n\treturn true\n\n\n"
}
],
"fee_scope": [
{
"kind": "construction",
"observed_timing": "Spend inside start_construction before job creation; failed placement/payment/reservation does not become a valid job.",
"authority_status": "Observed implementation, not newly approved policy."
},
{
"kind": "supply",
"observed_timing": "Warehouse inventory addition and purchase transfer use the same minute; failed payment restores inventory/economy snapshots.",
"authority_status": "Observed implementation; not delivery completion charging."
},
{
"kind": "service",
"observed_timing": "Completion transaction uses service.payment.<id>, actual completion minute and immutable price_snapshot.",
"authority_status": "See callsite-audit.json; closure/shift boundary eligibility remains D05 pending."
},
{
"kind": "payroll",
"observed_timing": "Daily-close boundary records payment; closed P&L uses new wage accrual and excludes WAGE cash entries.",
"authority_status": "Original midnight daily close exists; no new wage values chosen."
},
{
"kind": "upkeep",
"observed_timing": "Ownership-time accrual and midnight settlement with arrears.",
"authority_status": "A01 approved; do not re-ask or move timing."
},
{
"kind": "warp/furnace",
"observed_timing": null,
"authority_status": "No accepted producer mapped in this bounded audit. Do not treat implementation absence/search result as a completed feature or choose timing."
}
],
"save_observations": [
"Economy snapshot stores every entry, idempotency key to transaction ID mapping, sequence and current_minute.",
"Economy restore validates before atomic assignment and rebuilds transaction metadata.",
"Coordinator snapshot stores day summaries and pending/deferred boundaries; runtime wrapper includes coordinator snapshot."
],
"not_proven": [
"Full save pipeline and cross-PID replay at current version.",
"Original/approved authority for every fee timing.",
"D05 choice and all seven-domain native acceptance."
],
"formal_acceptance": false,
"product_modified": false,
"logistics_observations": [
"Runtime always invokes logistics tick after optional positive-reserve purchasing/delivery generation; therefore tick invocation alone is not evidence of stopped transfer.",
"Pickup/delivery call FacilityInstance.allows_logistics, which requires manual-open, power, durability, no suspension and related-facility operation; it does not inspect opening intervals.",
"Transfer guards do not directly consult operating-hour intervals. End-to-end scheduled closure propagation and carrier movement require further evidence; manual-versus-scheduled stopping is not accepted from this excerpt alone."
]
}
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
{
"status": "not_approval_ready",
"source_head": "a257976ae2b448c27b5756ed86c52cec5d17109f",
"source_pins": {
"docs/traceability/original/BASELINE.txt": "75e4bdbdeb379c9269553f0c776bdb9cc96e01f2d6aa5ca650d132c63a8aeb1a",
"docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/decisions.json": "ad0673051b0fa601e525f05128e0b11e2dddd9d4bae6a3e0170bbf47da35efe9",
"autoload/simulation_runtime.gd": "d52a995ae715542bbc550f68d35889540658275d12e04ae0b21ac276f5843f39",
"scripts/core/simulation_kernel.gd": "341c0c878c4894adbac628d0db6362ff69fc3347bdd9e61e50936e15dc2d1edb",
"scripts/facility/facility_service.gd": "ceb4a3e9224587423f273cdb2b56e6843ab176ac1fc4fe79dd498b5ed5c33b77"
},
"product_modified": false,
"D05_approved": false,
"original_unit_complete": false,
"repair_budget_changed": false,
"remaining": [
"all service scope and manual closure semantics",
"EV/rescue/logistics stopping position and restart",
"cost timing authority and day-period attribution",
"independent proposal review"
],
"original_denominator": {
"packages": 30,
"delivery_units": 88,
"completed": 9
},
"scope_audit_sha256": "a218444238e7cb8f264e6055e80b28ffa17f42c423ec75908b92ab10d605dace",
"definition_count_observed": 37
}
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
{
"status": "not_approval_ready",
"formal_acceptance_review": false,
"D05_approved": false,
"review_job": "bd1b2ea59b8f498b975edb678b872bd8",
"followup_scope": [
"Resolve daily-close FINALIZE label versus actual callback behavior.",
"Provide already-observed ElevatorService stop code and paired-arrival handling to reviewer; potential pair separation is an unproven hypothesis.",
"Map fee producer minute, day aggregation, UI and save using existing contracts."
],
"unproven_risks_not_confirmed_bugs": [
"rescue pair separation on emergency landing",
"missing actor projection on elevator arrival"
],
"product_changed": false,
"boundary_followup": "boundary-followup-r02.json",
"boundary_followup_sha256": "3f45ddad5adb8e3a5db5cecbc686267b31be85f0bd76283c97e382bf2ec49e88",
"resolved_static_questions": [
"Actual daily-close callback has no direct facility completion call.",
"Closed financial period excludes its end; current open-day UI includes current minute.",
"Boarded paired cancellation is explicitly rejected."
],
"remaining_followup": [
"Verify persisted day/ledger identity and same-candidate resume behavior.",
"Map all fee producers to approved authority rather than treating implementation as approval.",
"Complete service-kind/manual closure and logistics scopes, then review finite decision alternatives."
],
"latest_diagnostic": "review-disposition-r03.json"
}
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
{
"status": "not_approval_ready",
"review_job": "3531c49884894be6a38b90715a533505",
"formal_acceptance_review": false,
"D05_approved": false,
"product_modified": false,
"repair_budget_changed": false,
"accepted_findings": [
"Construction job created_at is not directly passed to payment minute; require actual path consistency evidence.",
"The transfer guard does not directly inspect operating intervals; do not extend this to complete scheduled-closure behavior.",
"Snapshot structure does not prove full save pipeline or cross-PID behavior.",
"Unmapped warp/furnace fee timing remains incomplete."
],
"scope_clarifications": [
"Service/payroll/upkeep excerpts already exist in callsite-audit.json and boundary-followup-r02.json; omitted from this deliberately bounded diagnostic, not globally missing source evidence.",
"Additional source reading is already authorized by the active goal; the diagnostic recommendation to request separate read permission is not adopted. New repair/Runner-core change remains outside current authorization.",
"The resource adapter snapshot/restore pair is now recorded: both game state and economy are captured, with rollback on restore inconsistency. This is static evidence, not a proof of every native failure outcome."
],
"finite_remaining": [
"Choose closure/service-kind scope and final shift interval handling.",
"Choose elevator emergency landing versus cabin hold policy under total depletion.",
"Pin all original fee producers and their authority; no fabricated warp/furnace timing.",
"Prove current save/resume, reservation/notification and stopped movement invariants using applicable evidence after policy freeze.",
"Formal independent acceptance and integration remain required."
]
}
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
# MP-01 診断レビュー補足 r02(未承認)
元のPROPOSAL.md/proposal.jsonは未受入worker成果のスナップショットとして保持する。この補足は窓口による算術・判断材料であり、worker修正、正式試験、正式レビュー、P06-01受入を代行しない。修正回数を増やさず、製品値を変更しない。
余裕案の需要63・生成40では200から毎周期23減少し、9周期目に0になる。旧説明の「12周期で枯渇」は「120分時点で0」と「初めて0となる時点」を混同している。numeric-followup-r02.jsonに全9周期の列を記録した。
炉100の投入前に直前残量だけで空き容量100を確認しても安全ではない。容量300・B=200・世界樹20・需要16・炉100では、需要精算後も304となり4が捨てられる。人物消費後のoverflowを許さない契約を選ぶなら、この入力は拒否する必要がある。B=196なら最終300でoverflow0、B=300なら104のoverflowになる。比較は候補式に対する計算であり、炉を動作させた結果ではない。
承認候補として、(A) 世界樹と需要を仮計算した後の空き容量で炉を判定する、(B) 需要を差し引く前に世界樹込みの空き容量を予約する、を区別する。Aは当該周期の需要ぶんを有効活用でき、Bはより保守的に投入を拒否する。いずれも人物・残量・投入receiptを一括確定し、拒否時に人物を消費しない。ここでA/Bを採用しない。
残量0から世界樹で復帰する案は生成Gが保持需要Dを超える場合に限られる。生成が需要以下でafter=0なら、原本の全館停止を維持する。「不足がないから稼働」とする別ルールに変更しない。生成停止と配電線断を区別し、後者では正の残量でも局所停止し得る。
独立診断の「1炉100では需要63を補えない」は数値として採用しない。世界樹20+炉100は63を上回る。ただし人物消費コスト、持続可能性、副作用、未定義13施設の需要は未承認であり、バランス保証にはならない。人物分類や忠誠度の副作用を既存数値から捏造しない。
not_approval_readyを維持する。次の正式段階は、未決契約の選択、全入力付き比較と保存domainの整理、Runnerのproposal-consistency検証、別セッション正式レビューである。原30パッケージ/88成果、完了9件は変えない。
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
# 未承認・製品未反映:MP-01 マナ契約候補
承認用の候補案です。P06-01の受入や原88成果の完了を意味せず、分母にも加えません。製品・人物・資源・仕様原本・台帳は変更していません。正式試験と別セッションレビューはRunnerが実施します。
## 根拠と区別
原本 `docs/traceability/original/BASELINE.txt` 9.1は枯渇時の全館停止、10.6はマナ炉6×3・裏地下・奴隷消費を規定します。6.1/6.5の代替不可能・解雇売却不可・原則ロストしない人物は投入から除外します。数値、容量、生成周期、炉の収率は原本にありません。
現実装 `autoload/game_state.gd` の初期mana=100は残量です。`autoload/simulation_runtime.gd` のSTARTER_MANA_OUTPUT=100はネットワーク供給能力であり、100 Mana/10分という承認済み生成率ではありません。`maintenance_mana` は完成施設のconsumer需要に登録され、`mana_network_service.gd` の10ゲーム分周期で配電されます。これは現時点で残量から差し引く維持エネルギーではありません。ネットワークの優先配電・75%の縮退・10分の停止保持と、全館のreserve>0ゲートは別です。Runtimeの定期マナ更新はネットワーク評価と電力投影であり、有限残量helperの定期生成消費接続ではありません。
`tests/s2/test_mana_reserve_balance.gd` の残量7・容量10・時刻360、時刻370の生成5・需要8→残量4は試験入力です。承認済み製品値ではなく、今回その試験を実行していません。現sourceのSHA256と区分はJSONのsource_pinsに記録しました。候補の来歴はcandidate、原本・実装・fixtureと区別しています。
## 承認する候補範囲
| 案 | 初期Mana | 容量Mana | 世界樹生成Mana/10ゲーム分 |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| 推薦 | 100 | 300 | 20 |
| 慎重 | 100 | 200 | 10 |
| 余裕 | 200 | 600 | 40 |
全て未承認です。推薦は現初期残量100を維持する候補であり、100を原本値と主張しません。容量300は初期の3倍の有限バッファ、生成20は下記の通常需要16を4だけ上回り、全定義一基ずつの需要63には足りない設計上の選択です。周期10は現配電評価境界への整合を理由に提案します。全ゲームのバランス保証ではありません。
換算案は各完成・保有施設のmaintenance_manaを1周期のMana消費量とし、D=Σ(基数×定義値)とします。閉店・停止中も維持需要を計上し、枯渇による需要免除と無償復帰の振動を避けます。撤去・破壊済みは除外します。金維持費の承認A01と同一契約ではなく、別途承認するマナ案です。Manaは整数、時刻はゲーム内分、初回は初期時刻360から370までの一周期です。現実時間10秒=ゲーム内1時間との関係を生成量へ重複換算しません。
B=直前残量、C=容量、G=その周期の世界樹生成、F=確定した炉生成、D=需要。
- available=B+G+F
- consumed=min(available,D)
- shortage=D-consumed
- overflow=max(0,available-consumed-C)
- after=min(C,available-consumed)
需要を賄ってから余剰を蓄積し、超過は明記して破棄します。after=0では需要ゼロ施設も含め全館停止。供給そのものは停止館外の世界樹から復帰可能とし、次の境界でafter>0かつ局所配電条件成立の場合だけ再開します。ネットワークstorageと残量を二重計上しません。ネットワーク供給100をGとして足すこともしません。供給能力・局所切断と残量の二つのゲートを保ちます。
## 需要と計算比較
JSONはdata/facilities配下の全37定義を列挙します。省略されたmaintenance_manaはFacilityDefinitionの現default=0と明示し、未定義施設のunknownとは区別します。各行のpath・definition_id・observed_maintenance_manaを入力に、全定義一基ずつの合計は63です。定義の存在を通常登録・稼働とみなしません。
歴史監査CURRENT_FACILITY_AUDIT.mdにある対応定義なし13施設(VIPスイート、ドミトリー、レストラン、屋台、カジノ、闘技場、高級ソープ、SM拷問室、覗き部屋、地下牢、マナ炉、ワープ、魔法砲台)は需要unknownです。魔力制御室3×2は原本マナ炉6×3の代替ではありません。現在の定義一覧と歴史監査の登録数も混同しません。
比較は候補式の計算のみです。F=0、初期時刻360、10分刻み。低負荷D=2(食堂一基)、通常D=16(食堂・厨房・大浴場・客EV・受付・警備員詰所各一基)、需要超過D=63(全37定義各一基)を120分計算します。zero・capacityは10分、供給喪失復帰は30分。全入力、各周期結果、shortage/overflowはJSONに保存しています。
| 条件 | 推薦の結果 | 慎重の結果 | 余裕の結果 |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| 低負荷120分 | 300 Mana | 196 Mana | 600 Mana |
| 通常120分 | 148 Mana | 28 Mana | 488 Mana |
| 需要超過120分 | 0 Mana | 0 Mana | 0 Mana |
| 初期0・通常需要10分 | 4 Mana | 0 Mana | 24 Mana |
| 初期満容量・低負荷10分 | 300 Mana | 200 Mana | 600 Mana |
| 生成0→0→通常・需要16、30分 | 72 Mana | 62 Mana | 192 Mana |
| 通常10分後、同分再送 | 104 Mana | 94 Mana | 224 Mana |
推薦の需要超過は100→57→14→0、3周期目にshortage29、その後は毎周期shortage43。通常は100+12×(20−16)=148。供給喪失復帰は100→84→68→72。初期0は生成20−需要16=4で次境界復帰、慎重案は生成10でshortage6、停止を維持します。満容量では需要を支払った余剰のみoverflow。余裕案は復帰しやすい一方、需要63には12周期で枯渇します。
同分再送は全案とも保存済み結果の返却だけで残量不変。同じ分で異なる入力は拒否します。局所供給線だけ喪失する場合もpower_available=falseを投影し、残量が正でも停止します。復帰は局所配電の停止保持条件を満たした評価境界で行い、残量が0なら再開しません。これらは設計比較で、実機受入結果ではありません。
## 炉の候補
原本寸法・裏地下を維持。所有する一般奴隷1名→100 Mana、一炉につき次の10分境界で一回の明示投入を提案します。ユニーク・代替不可能・売却不可・保護対象・ヒロイン・ライバル、客、一般従業員、分類不明な拘束者は除外。適格性が不明なら拒否します。自動投入は行わない案です。
投入前に所有・適格性・炉稼働・空き容量100以上を再検証。人物除去、Mana加算、投入IDと境界・対象ID・適格性根拠・前後残量の履歴を一つの保存可能な原子操作として確定する案です。容量不足では投入せず、人物を消費してoverflowを捨てる案にしません。確定前中断は無変更で取消、確定後中断は保存receiptから復帰して再消費しません。枯渇中の炉は稼働しないため世界樹で先に復帰します。これは将来実装契約の候補で、今回は実際の人物消費も資源変更もありません。
## 更新順序と保存
D05はdecisions.jsonのpendingです。現順序はAPPLY_COMMANDS→TIME_BOUNDARIES→MANA→CONSTRUCTION→LOGISTICS→FACILITY_COMPLETION→VITALS_AND_ENVIRONMENT→INCIDENTS_AND_EVENTS→FACILITY_QUEUES→AI_DECISIONS→PUBLISH_SNAPSHOT。推薦はこのphase列を保持し、MANA内で入力snapshot→生成/炉取引のstage→残量計算→局所配電→全館ゲート→receipt確定とします。
00:00の既承認Gold維持費は閉店・停電でも所有時間に応じて精算し、マナ停止を理由に取り消しません。06:00/18:00の勤務境界は保持。マナ評価後の物流・サービス完了・queueは確定電力を参照する案です。未完了サービスを完了として課金せず、EV/搬送は位置・荷物・ID・ルートを保持して停止、復帰で重複搬送しない案。日跨ぎ完了・費用時点・移動中の具体処理はD05承認前に製品へ接続しません。
旧GameStateは非負値を復元でき0を許し、get_resourceで欠落も0として参照されます。0は現在の投影では停止であり、無制限・満量の証拠ではありません。ネットワークsnapshot版1、save format1/2は新しい残量容量・生成率契約の承認を意味しません。
移行案は適用元版と新domain版を明示し、preview・検証済みbackup後に原子的適用。明示旧0は0・停止を維持。正値は承認容量内のみ保持。欠落、曖昧、負値、非整数、容量超過は拒否して元保存・live状態を保持し、黙って切り詰めません。新保存は残量・容量・最後の境界/flow・炉receipt・配電投影を保持。同境界同入力は再消費・イベント再発行なし、異入力/逆行は拒否。時間飛びは各10分境界を順に処理し、offline生成は別承認なしには行いません。
## 不足・承認待ちと検証
D04の値と換算、D05の境界処理、炉の対象判定・収率・履歴、新保存domain版と移行元適用条件を承認範囲として分けます。未定義13施設の需要、実際の配置基数、全ゲームの性能・経済バランスは未確定です。原P06-01は未達を維持します。
静的に参照sourceと計算を確認した成果です。正式proposal-consistency試験・別Claudeレビュー・承認・統合・完了確定はRunnerに委ね、合格を自己宣言しません。
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
{
"observed_at_jst": "2026-10-13T00:25:48.063475+09:00",
"status": "draft_unaccepted_not_approval_ready",
"original_counts": {
"packages": 30,
"delivery_units": 88,
"completed": 9
},
"applied_to_product": false,
"entries": [
{
"path": "docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/checkpoints/mana-proposal-draft-r01/PROPOSAL.md",
"sha256": "95024959e7c301c6a68a24de36dd6629e45b189f9d038f4397757124ba0bb41f",
"bytes": 9918,
"source": "/Users/korizatou114/Projects/TheTree-managed-worktrees/mana-proposal/MP-01-implement/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/mana-proposal/PROPOSAL.md",
"scope": "unaccepted draft snapshot only; not original unit acceptance"
},
{
"path": "docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/checkpoints/mana-proposal-draft-r01/proposal.json",
"sha256": "aca6d781d5ce730c9f905b5dc817f27548b372b043beea68cf6de73761f6f0d2",
"bytes": 71713,
"source": "/Users/korizatou114/Projects/TheTree-managed-worktrees/mana-proposal/MP-01-implement/docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/mana-proposal/proposal.json",
"scope": "unaccepted draft snapshot only; not original unit acceptance"
}
],
"root_checks": {
"source_pins_verified": 53,
"arithmetic_flows_verified": 126,
"demand_resources": 37,
"one_each_observed_load": 63,
"scope": "proposal arithmetic/source traceability only; no game or formal Runner acceptance"
},
"known_formal_gaps": [
"source_pins list differs from fixed mapping schema",
"formal proposal-consistency not executed",
"formal Runner reviewer not executed",
"managed worker stopped after two correction attempts; no unlimited retries"
],
"read_only_content_review_job": "9d8583a74456470ea73a2bd531feb8ca",
"diagnostic_review_completed": true,
"content_findings": [
"HIGH-1 furnace headroom moment ambiguous; same-boundary tree generation can create overflow after consuming actor; furnace F>0 boundary cases absent",
"HIGH-2 restore from zero only possible when generation exceeds retained demand; after==0 stop must preserve original depletion constraint; unconditional recovery claim needs qualification and owner decision",
"MED-1 generous excess demand reaches zero on ninth interval, not twelfth",
"MED-2 distinguish tree generation loss from local distribution loss; stock balance and local power result separate"
],
"review_disposition": "review-disposition.json"
}
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
{
"status": "unapproved_diagnostic_supplement",
"formal_acceptance": false,
"product_modified": false,
"original_delivery_complete": false,
"worker_repair_started": false,
"worker_snapshot_preserved": true,
"cases": [
{
"B": 200,
"C": 300,
"G": 20,
"D": 16,
"F": 100,
"available": 320,
"consumed": 16,
"after": 300,
"overflow": 4,
"post_tree_demand_headroom": 96,
"proposed_no_overflow_acceptance": false
},
{
"B": 196,
"C": 300,
"G": 20,
"D": 16,
"F": 100,
"available": 316,
"consumed": 16,
"after": 300,
"overflow": 0,
"post_tree_demand_headroom": 100,
"proposed_no_overflow_acceptance": true
},
{
"B": 300,
"C": 300,
"G": 20,
"D": 16,
"F": 100,
"available": 420,
"consumed": 16,
"after": 300,
"overflow": 104,
"post_tree_demand_headroom": -4,
"proposed_no_overflow_acceptance": false
},
{
"B": 100,
"C": 300,
"G": 20,
"D": 63,
"F": 100,
"available": 220,
"consumed": 63,
"after": 157,
"overflow": 0,
"post_tree_demand_headroom": 243,
"proposed_no_overflow_acceptance": true
}
],
"generous_excess_demand": {
"initial": 200,
"generation": 40,
"demand": 63,
"intervals_to_zero": 9,
"amounts": [
200,
177,
154,
131,
108,
85,
62,
39,
16,
0
]
},
"open_choices": [
"Reserve capacity after staging tree generation and demand, or reserve conservative capacity before demand; owner must approve the chosen contract.",
"Actor eligibility and loyalty side effects need authority; no numerical penalty invented.",
"Separate tree generation loss from local distribution failure; do not equate positive stock with operational power."
]
}
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
{
"observed_at_jst": "2026-10-13T00:29:23.970192+09:00",
"status": "not_approval_ready",
"product_modified": false,
"original_delivery_completed": false,
"diagnostic_review": "diagnostic-independent-review.json",
"accepted_findings": [
"HIGH-1 furnace headroom moment ambiguous; same-boundary tree generation can create overflow after consuming actor; furnace F>0 boundary cases absent",
"HIGH-2 restore from zero only possible when generation exceeds retained demand; after==0 stop must preserve original depletion constraint; unconditional recovery claim needs qualification and owner decision",
"MED-1 generous excess demand reaches zero on ninth interval, not twelfth",
"MED-2 distinguish tree generation loss from local distribution loss; stock balance and local power result separate"
],
"review_suggestions_not_auto_adopted": [
"Replacing depletion stop with shortage-only would change original depletion constraint; do not apply automatically",
"MED-3 assertion that one furnace cannot offset demand63 is numerically incorrect: generation20+furnace100 exceeds63 each interval; actual actor cost and sustainable operation still unapproved",
"Furnace loyalty side effects and bankruptcy actor eligibility remain proposal decisions; do not fabricate original numeric effect"
],
"other_findings_deferred": [
"infirmary.tres duplicate properties and unknown queue_staff_min recorded outside proposal scope; no unsolicited fix"
],
"formal_workflow_gaps": [
"source_pins list differs from registered mapping schema",
"formal validator and Runner review absent",
"worker correction stopped due forbidden reuse-input reads, despite exact local copy; retry cap respected"
],
"next_original_candidate": "P24-03",
"proposal_numeric_choices_unapproved": true
}
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
{
"schema_version": 1,
"scope": "Internal evidence-format design within P04-01 checker work, not a new game rule or acceptance waiver. Missing or unsupported semantic proof must fail.",
"input_path": "BUILD_OUTPUT_DIR/p04-evidence/index.json",
"required_index_fields": {
"schema_version": 1,
"task_id": "P04-01",
"candidate_commit": "exact candidate Git SHA",
"source_map": "repository-relative file to raw SHA256; all observed runtime/kernel/affected service sources required",
"environment": "engine path/hash, OS, configuration and inputs raw pins",
"artifacts": "unique artifact id to build-relative path/bytes/sha256/type; resolve safely within evidence dir; reject missing, duplicate, symlink, traversal",
"domains": "exact7 required domain objects",
"authority": "original file raw pin + applicable approved decision refs; pending mandatory rules are errors",
"review_status": "pending_review or approved; pending review may pass mechanical stage only if every original evidence predicate passed",
"formal_acceptance": false
},
"required_domains": [
"閉店",
"停電",
"破壊",
"退出",
"課金",
"シフト交代",
"00:00決算"
],
"domain_fields": {
"source_refs": "actual current functions/phase order source pins",
"authority_refs": "original/approved refs; implementation observations alone do not authorize a missing rule",
"cases": "finite scenario IDs and artifact IDs binding input, before state, delivered operation/clock boundary, after state, producer/consumer PID and unchanged raw save package where applicable",
"invariants": "supported predicate descriptors on actual raw JSON observation/state data; not boolean pass claims or test counts",
"applicability": "exact source/config/input/environment bindings; old mismatch cannot auto-pass"
},
"native_receipt_predicates": [
"actual owned PID>0; start/end PID identical; exit0 and engine_ended; receipt bound to pinned rawstdout/native logs",
"source pins in observation and phase receipt match index and checkout; config/input pins are verified",
"where cross-process evidence is claimed, PIDs differ and exact formal save members match producer and consumer pins"
],
"invariant_predicate_format": {
"artifact_id": "existing pinned raw observation or state artifact",
"json_pointer": "RFC6901 JSON pointer into artifact JSON",
"operator": "one of eq, nonnegative, distinct, same_literal, count_eq; reject unknown",
"expected": "only applicable original/approved rule values or independently computed actual state relationships, never unapproved numeric policy",
"paired_artifact_id": "when comparing before/after or restart, required paired pinned raw artifact",
"paired_json_pointer": "comparison source if needed",
"authority_ref": "original/approved authority for this condition",
"raw_origin": "actual engine-produced source or explicit root derivation with each raw input hash and documented formula; unsupported derivation rejected"
},
"original_invariant_mapping": [
"停止が有効な区間のactual service/payment/accounting before-after差が許可されない売上を含まない。停止が未確定D05ならfail。",
"同じ00:00境界の精算receiptが1回、同境界再送と再開で資金/台帳が不変。A01時点は承認済み。",
"閉店/破壊/退出でlive reservationsとactive targetの対応が一致し、除去/復元後の孤立が0。",
"課金の再送/再開で同じservice/payment identityが重複反映されない。",
"閉店後serviceとシフト最終区間等の未承認解釈を実装観測だけでpassしない。"
],
"fail_closed": [
"missing index or mandatory fields",
"duplicate keys/IDs, invalid field types or paths",
"unknown predicate or unsupported proof source",
"raw file hash/size, source/config/input/environment mismatch",
"mandatory D05 rule pending or authority missing",
"unexecuted proof, incomplete7domain or required boundary coverage",
"selfreported pass/test count as substitute for actual state invariants"
],
"implementation_note": "Implement this finite mechanical protocol and document exact supported predicates. If evidence is absent, output actual missing IDs and exit nonzero. No requirement to create fake pass evidence. Do not change source/Clock/game numbers; no engine/test run by worker."
}
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# Runner実行担当からの第1修正入力
これは原ゲーム仕様の変更ではありません。旧Runtimeと差分診断を追加試験入力として供給します。既存監査を再実装せず、技術的な証拠index形式とfailclosed checkerを作成してください。原7領域とD05 pendingを維持します。原条件の証拠欠損は検証失敗です。rootは検証器のsourceを変更していません。
読取専用入力(Runner allocation.build_dir内):
- /Users/korizatou114/Projects/TheTree-managed-worktrees/p04-01/.runtime/P04-01/build/audit-support/support.json
- /Users/korizatou114/Projects/TheTree-managed-worktrees/p04-01/.runtime/P04-01/build/audit-support/historical-runtime.txt
旧Runtime SHA256: 2d7e2cea5424585e9aa4302ab66d1fc4dbaefe743ce4328fccc1efa2f19b82e4。入力を検証してからdiffしてください。
内部indexの形式設計はspecの検証器作成指示に含まれる技術判断であり、原ゲーム規則の補完ではありません。欠損/古いソース/不正hash/未実行/未定義必須規則は必ず非0にしてください。全証拠が揃わないまま元成果を完了扱いにしないでください。エンジン・全回帰・製品source編集は0。
実際のClaude commanderの記録済み判断:
{
"action": "request-repair",
"task_id": "P04-01",
"reason": "初回Codex blockedの原因は、検証器tools/check_p04_order_evidence.pyが未作成だったこと(missing gate schemaで仕様補完を避けて停止)。これは内部証拠formatの実装判断で、原ゲーム仕様の不足ではない。既存specの検証器作成指示が、元要件を守るfailclosed形式の設計を許可している。repairs=0で、第1repairは残2/2以内。入力は再起動に十分: input.json等のlocal copy、current source pins、14差分(production7とmanaged14を区別、追加7はroot対managedでCRLF→LFのみbyte検証済み、rawSHA差は隠さない)、正確な旧Runtime(SHA 2d7e2cea完全一致)をbuild_dir/audit-support/historical-runtime.txtへraw保存済み。support.jsonとこのtxtを読取専用の追加試験入力として使う(Git変更scopeなし)。repair範囲: (1) 既存のorder-audit.jsonとORDER_AUDIT.mdは保持し、重複作成しない。必要なら最小の追記・訂正のみ。(2) --verify-onlyのcheckerを作成する。BUILD_OUTPUT_DIR/p04-evidence/index.jsonを必須とし、7領域、不変のsource pin、raw proof hash、適用性を検証する。欠損、D05 pending、stale source、未実行proof、自己申告pass、test count単独のpassは非0で終了する。raw証拠が全て不足していてもcheckerは作成する。生証拠を作ったことにはしない。D05は未承認のまま、その不足がある受入をpassにしない。(3) 全回帰・engine実行、ゲームsource変更、Clock・値の変更は0。原7領域/元30/88/部分点なしの受入分母は維持し、仕様変更・分母変更・予算拡大・main統合は含めない。allowed_pathsは検証器と実行ディレクトリ配下に限る。"
}
追加技術入力: 同じaudit-support内のruntime-diff.patchは旧SHA確認済みRuntimeと現Runtimeのdiff -u出力です。原ソース2件と突合して利用できます。
前回shellのhere-documentは/tmp作成制限で失敗しています。sandbox/権限を変更せず、既存のpython -c等の一時ファイル不要の方式、または許可scopeへのapply_patchを使ってください。前回未読だったこの文書とP04_ORDER_EVIDENCE_PROTOCOL.jsonを最初に読んでください。index形式は技術設計であり、未知ゲーム規則の確定ではありません。D05や証拠不足は非0を維持し、検証器と設計書をsubmittedとして提出することは元成果acceptedではありません。
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
{
"task_id": "P04-01",
"base_commit": "deb1bcb2374eb378b840ca345db952bd8572cb6e",
"status": "blocked",
"preexisting_files": ["order-audit.json", "ORDER_AUDIT.md"],
"verifier_created": false,
"blockers": [
"Local inputs specify no evidence index schema, mandatory proof identifiers, raw-proof predicates or authority binding. Implementing an accepting verifier would supplement unspecified requirements.",
"D05 remains pending; approved A01 is retained without reconfirmation.",
"Verified local historical raw proofs and exact old Runtime source are required for reuse and exact diff. Artifact paths are provenance only."
],
"read_only_observations": [
"Current kernel lines 123-153 and Runtime registrations 364-427 confirm the phase sequence recorded in the preexisting audit.",
"Git read-only path history lists ten Runtime revisions; this turn has not scanned their content hashes."
],
"hash_reconfirmation": "Not completed: shell rejected temporary-file creation for the Python here-document before execution. Preexisting hash claims are not new verification results.",
"tests_executed": false,
"original_unit_complete": false,
"counted_units_added": 0,
"next_step": "Supply evidence protocol and verified local historical source/raw proofs; Runner performs formal validation and independent review."
}
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
{
"original_id": "P04-01",
"first_repair_terminal_job": "c1adc9490e8e4e86b84ff631527e7a56",
"first_repair_result": "worker_blocked; verifier not created",
"verified_unread_input_cause": "worker command log did not read ROOT_REPAIR_INPUT or audit-support; file search matched P04/ORDER",
"final_repair_decision": {
"action": "request-repair",
"task_id": "P04-01",
"reason": "残り1回(repairs 1/2)の使用を妥当と判断します。前回blockedの原因は仕様不足ではなく入力不足です。実stdoutのcommand記録では、workerはROOT_REPAIR_INPUT.mdとbuild/audit-supportを読んでいませんでした。探索パターンが*P04*/*ORDER*だったため、供給された補足入力に当たらなかったと見られます。現在はP04_ORDER_REPAIR_INPUT.mdとP04_ORDER_EVIDENCE_PROTOCOL.jsonをallowed docsに供給済みです。両ファイルを実際に読むよう、既存の補足inputに指示も保存済みです。protocolは内部証拠schemaの技術設計です。具体field、typed raw predicate、native receipt、authority binding、全7 domain、failcaseを定めており、原ゲーム仕様、受入分母、予算の変更には当たりません。旧Runtime pinとraw pinは解決済みで、追加7件の差分は改行差として解決済みです。再試行の条件は次のとおりです。(1) 変更はtools/check_p04_order_evidence.pyと許可されたexecution/p04-01配下の最小docに限る。(2) D05がpendingならfailにする。(3) 証拠が未収集なら具体的な不足を出す。(4) 新projectでも修正回数はresetしない。このrepairでも仕様不足でblockedになった場合は、3回目の自動再試行はせず、オーナー判断に回します。"
},
"final_run_decision": {
"action": "run",
"task_id": "P04-01",
"reason": "P04-01は repair_ready で、repairs は 2/2(max_repair_attempts=2)です。第2repairは実dispatch済みで、必要な入力は供給済みです。入力はP04_ORDER_REPAIR_INPUT.mdとP04_ORDER_EVIDENCE_PROTOCOL.json、pin検証済みのoldRuntime/raw diff、here-doc不要の実行方法です。これは同一taskの最終runで、上限回避の新projectではありません。範囲はallowed_paths内の tools/check_p04_order_evidence.py と execution/p04-01/** に限ります。元spec範囲のまま、具体的な技術schemaに従って検証器を作成します。D05 pendingと証拠不足はfailとし、製品source変更、engine実行、full回帰は行いません。元の7/30/88分母も維持します。仕様変更、分母変更、予算拡大、承認、main統合は含みません。このrunが再失敗した場合は第3repairを行わず、オーナー判断へ戻します。"
},
"repair_job": "4d757d5ee0064fcb8732ac020797e5f9",
"final_run_job": "7ee8c11565634ed2946c68ca7977e8dc",
"final_run_id": "c7923e00641d4d988a4b3729ef6a4e79",
"input_read_confirmed_in_command_log": true,
"repairs": 2,
"max_repairs": 2,
"verifier_source_written_by_root": false,
"technical_protocol_only": true,
"D05_approved": false,
"formal_acceptance": false,
"original_denominator": {
"packages": 30,
"deliveries": 88,
"completed": 9,
"partial_credit": false
}
}
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
# P04-01 監査状態
原単位は未完了。D05の閉店後開始済サービスと18:00最終勤務区間は未承認であり、現実装の観測を承認済み規約に置き換えない。A01の00:00保有時間按分維持費は承認済み。
正式試験はRunnerが実行する。旧証跡参照は来歴であり、現版の生証跡・ソース・設定・入力・環境の適用性確認なしに合格として再利用しない。
## 現行ソースの観測
`scripts/core/simulation_kernel.gd:123-153` の順序は APPLY_COMMANDS → 時計増分・日境界signal → TIME_BOUNDARIES → MANA → CONSTRUCTION → LOGISTICS → FACILITY_COMPLETION → VITALS_AND_ENVIRONMENT → INCIDENTS_AND_EVENTS → FACILITY_QUEUES → AI_DECISIONS → PUBLISH_SNAPSHOT。同phase内はhandler IDの辞書順(242行)。Runtimeの登録は364-427行。時計や製品ロジックは変更していない。
| 領域 | 現行呼出しと先後 | 原本・承認・不足 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 閉店 | `_advance_facilities` の後、`_advance_guest_queues` が `_release_closed_business_queues` を実行し、patienceより先に予約解放を試みる。 | 閉店後開始済サービスはD05保留。旧business試験は部分候補。open serviceの00:00証拠を代用しない。 |
| 停電 | `_advance_mana` → `mana_power_projection.apply` → FacilityService `_prepare_service_for_tick`。NO_POWERはpause、復電はresume。 | 草案の961停止/962復電/963不変は生証跡未確認。進捗・予約・帳簿・通知を現版で確認する必要がある。 |
| 破壊 | commandはAPPLY_COMMANDSで先行。`_advance_defense` は完了後のINCIDENTS。BROKENはサービス準備時に失敗。 | 先行破壊44と後段完了45を区別。失敗診断も保持し、原本適合と断定しない。 |
| 退出 | 公開queue leave → 完了 → INCIDENTS → queue patience解放 → AI再計画/予定退出。LEAVINGのdespawnは入状態分より後。 | 公開leave・自動patience・overdue退出の正式保存/別PID証跡は参照のみ。孤立0を現版で証明する必要がある。 |
| 課金 | `_complete_service` callback → `_complete_service_transaction` → `_apply_service_transaction`。予約消費後、service IDによるpayment keyで記帳し、通知scopeを終了。 | 原価格・時間を変えない。静的なidempotency keyの存在や試験数だけで二重課金・二重生成なしとしない。 |
| シフト交代 | 完了後の `_advance_staff_ai` 内でstaff更新・commute・staffing投影。 | 原本64/67行の18:00交代を保持。最終区間の解釈はD05保留。1080診断を承認規約に格上げしない。 |
| 00:00決算 | TIME_BOUNDARIESのweather/upkeep/operationsが完了より先。OperationsCoordinatorのdaily closeと同分service売上は別区間。 | 原本71/72行、承認済A01を保持。1440一回/1441不変の生証跡と適用性が必要。給与0fixtureを非ゼロ給与証拠に数えない。 |
## 再利用の制限
詳細ハッシュ・7領域の不足は `order-audit.json` に記録した。ローカル旧mapはSHA256 `df8328ea8b6a7bc400caad8a52f6ead710c01942a726e5a6b530b82411c55da5`、1299件、欠落0件。主要6ソースの指定pinは一致。旧mapとの差は14件で、契約記載のRuntime/main/preview/performance/path/2試験の7件に加え、Kenney同梱サンプル/URL7件がバイト不一致だった。追加7件の原因・境界への無影響は未確定で、素材を編集していない。
Runtimeは現行の施設・勤務・Mana・課金・退出の呼出しを読んだ。ローカルGitのRuntime path履歴10版を検索したが、旧SHA `2d7e2cea` 完全一致版を得られなかったため、正確な旧版diffは実施できていない。旧ソースの検証済ローカルコピーが必要。現在のpath/infrastructure連携は移動・勤務・客選択・復元到達性に関わるため、主要サービス一致だけで全旧証跡を再利用しない。
ローカル入力は旧summary/map/draftであり、生の保存package・stdout・engineログ・開始終了記録・設定・入力・環境証拠は提供されていない。外部worktreeのartifactパスは来歴に留め、読んでいない。正式保存8境界27状態、fresh Reader A/B、P04-02/fullの成功記載は未検証参照で、P04-01受入を意味しない。
## blockedと有限検証計画
`BUILD_OUTPUT_DIR/p04-evidence/index.json` の項目形式、必須証跡ID、生証跡の判定形式と原本規約への結合方法は入力にない。これらを独自規約で補完しないため `tools/check_p04_order_evidence.py` は未作成。D05未定義・証跡欠落・stale/unexecutedを必ず失敗させ、独立レビューはmachine段階だけ保留可能とする要件を保持する。
1. Rootから証跡形式、検証済旧Runtime、生証跡のローカルコピーを受領する。
2. 14差分と実呼出しの適用性を確認し、設定・入力・環境とハッシュが揃う有限証跡だけ再利用する。
3. D05承認後に閉店/18:00の依存境界だけ補完し、停止復電・先行後段破壊・公開/自動退出・00:00・再送/復元の不足分を絞る。
4. Runnerがp04-acceptanceと全条件の独立レビュー・統合を実施する。native Windows限定条件が必要なら個別保留とする。
試験・Runner操作・Git書込み・他エージェント起動は行っていない。原30パッケージ/88成果の既存1単位内の準備であり、成果追加0、正式完了0。
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
{
"input_hashes": {
"docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p04-01-input-r01/ORDER_CONTRACT_DRAFT.md": "c4dd8b907321b8859ba0744b9ae3d1447615d98fbe548983f9bb9fcad2d9d989",
"docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p04-01-input-r01/input.json": "1286f865656aafb6146c7bcd95c92c53c00b6c706f3f690d96e998d5e45e2b79",
"docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p04-01-input-r01/historical-audit.json": "90d2dbd3c04aed7ab409afa4f05f884832a4661cc506d28b818c72aadc352950",
"docs/plans/original-completion-2026-10-02/execution/p04-01-input-r01/historical-source-map.json": "df8328ea8b6a7bc400caad8a52f6ead710c01942a726e5a6b530b82411c55da5"
},
"source_pins": {
"autoload/simulation_runtime.gd": {
"expected": "d52a995ae715542bbc550f68d35889540658275d12e04ae0b21ac276f5843f39",
"actual": "d52a995ae715542bbc550f68d35889540658275d12e04ae0b21ac276f5843f39",
"matches": true
},
"scripts/facility/facility_service.gd": {
"expected": "ceb4a3e9224587423f273cdb2b56e6843ab176ac1fc4fe79dd498b5ed5c33b77",
"actual": "ceb4a3e9224587423f273cdb2b56e6843ab176ac1fc4fe79dd498b5ed5c33b77",
"matches": true
},
"scripts/economy/economy_service.gd": {
"expected": "95aedd0a0421c93e8fa39f0f76fa890cd0a46905d9a25c88c8b17c4d6d47728e",
"actual": "95aedd0a0421c93e8fa39f0f76fa890cd0a46905d9a25c88c8b17c4d6d47728e",
"matches": true
},
"scripts/guest/guest_service.gd": {
"expected": "56880410e9a00816f9a95d30821982955532de8dd976980934e12016a9f2b21e",
"actual": "56880410e9a00816f9a95d30821982955532de8dd976980934e12016a9f2b21e",
"matches": true
},
"scripts/staff/staff_service.gd": {
"expected": "355ad5c3c9f85dc4d4ffc3bc4293e36f81078c403d1662512a735b2c8d815fb3",
"actual": "355ad5c3c9f85dc4d4ffc3bc4293e36f81078c403d1662512a735b2c8d815fb3",
"matches": true
},
"scripts/mana/mana_network_service.gd": {
"expected": "96f195cf2a28b0966d12cd7c6fab86d13eae97c8342d07d70f52e598fbf49af9",
"actual": "96f195cf2a28b0966d12cd7c6fab86d13eae97c8342d07d70f52e598fbf49af9",
"matches": true
}
},
"historical_map_entries": 1299,
"differences": [
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_dungeon/Tiled/sampleMap.tmx",
"old_sha256": "fc545787837e2655c9d2078cc1b167df0d9ea2755f6ec3912c7987e8501339e3",
"current_sha256": "3849e083e3d4f6a71dbf725d8473e93fa6ef8cdc9d314368eee15c980cf41775"
},
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_dungeon/Tiled/sampleSheet.tsx",
"old_sha256": "02f1b90cfdb37bcccddc83d074954272aaffd297ed4fabce7bb670f2f3f4be71",
"current_sha256": "a2cca2c5e50b14023ce00f5d4112fb0b8264bfff9407d7a5198656e28d67fa16"
},
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_dungeon/Visit Kenney.url",
"old_sha256": "0dd1a0b295582cd3185547f0c1d92b4d5392c7782b90a428e192944a496052e0",
"current_sha256": "6787defa3ecb6118622e1903b65802c0200628fae5164b51b4fd467f92f3f284"
},
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_dungeon/Visit Patreon.url",
"old_sha256": "84be5ef26b07905fa7e196e943c9807bf84138c3a71d87f51c6fd57b85c48c34",
"current_sha256": "2fcba31333935f4aa35e9de2e74e2b7ba1b1a8011540e08016ff6d81e9dd7490"
},
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_town/Tiny Dungeon (base pack).url",
"old_sha256": "6cf442be20ad3364ba87183461744da9e979b5d4f243c83e2404f2cf884500d9",
"current_sha256": "6d93bb958f9b7d5f21ceb8cbd24c184dc5c9f87aee7c680b336ecba7a89823d8"
},
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_town/Visit Kenney.url",
"old_sha256": "0dd1a0b295582cd3185547f0c1d92b4d5392c7782b90a428e192944a496052e0",
"current_sha256": "6787defa3ecb6118622e1903b65802c0200628fae5164b51b4fd467f92f3f284"
},
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_town/Visit Patreon.url",
"old_sha256": "84be5ef26b07905fa7e196e943c9807bf84138c3a71d87f51c6fd57b85c48c34",
"current_sha256": "2fcba31333935f4aa35e9de2e74e2b7ba1b1a8011540e08016ff6d81e9dd7490"
},
{
"path": "autoload/simulation_runtime.gd",
"old_sha256": "2d7e2cea5424585e9aa4302ab66d1fc4dbaefe743ce4328fccc1efa2f19b82e4",
"current_sha256": "d52a995ae715542bbc550f68d35889540658275d12e04ae0b21ac276f5843f39"
},
{
"path": "scenes/main/main.gd",
"old_sha256": "a7ae44c680eb9b70a117ddc8c6cbf0ca290b8e8d485eac41b4122698fde2a620",
"current_sha256": "a3d7d7ddd08a8df1f987806e60accf51792d728cf71c06e6b822f5a31d8ed3e3"
},
{
"path": "scenes/main/world_preview.gd",
"old_sha256": "3df29be32d3a016d8fb9dc1ee2bd32e2360ac8fad9810293f6be9b58d26046e0",
"current_sha256": "75d5b0bd23204f5a485540512e44b89e1d2a4596b368f70177a238ba078ff42d"
},
{
"path": "scripts/core/performance_budget.gd",
"old_sha256": "79d18e8f0dcc3932801cd02ea8a8ba037af02ef57665387cba8dbe3b3e9af917",
"current_sha256": "0e2278f88d29919a0634fc1b527328a0d0c12d87e2cd612f3eee1526aabdb073"
},
{
"path": "scripts/world/path_service.gd",
"old_sha256": "2e68653e4898387cb5a76402813a10595bd5ca7d5fb841c7ed8c55af77d7a918",
"current_sha256": "447135729a1106639a6eee6754af3195c8a8b458ca26980ae91fa39d80dcfbd4"
},
{
"path": "tests/s1/test_path_service.gd",
"old_sha256": "0f48bb44c27e32f08477b9aed61a0db5c8808219490928f734c3570a07efb251",
"current_sha256": "17d9fd42b35004376bf96e435f53d6bce41e79258ec7f6daf3ab04ae5d8c3e1d"
},
{
"path": "tests/ui/test_pixel_tower.gd",
"old_sha256": "93bdbb195f2ceec07dbe052e0d0a3017d84b56f1e8ec46b87be8d98105ec0f88",
"current_sha256": "f149f4b5507247dadf623e777e90b9bdb81f54324b406a8f55adaf89b649866a"
}
],
"missing_map_paths": [],
"task_id": "P04-01",
"base_commit": "deb1bcb2374eb378b840ca345db952bd8572cb6e",
"status": "blocked",
"original_unit_complete": false,
"counted_units_added": 0,
"tests_executed": false,
"authority": {
"original": "docs/traceability/original/BASELINE.txt:64,67,71,72",
"approved": "A01: ownership-time apportioned upkeep at midnight; retained without reconfirmation",
"pending": "D05: started service after closure, final shift interval at 18:00, unresolved EV/transport stopping/cost/day crossing rules; no invented policy"
},
"phase_order": "scripts/core/simulation_kernel.gd:123-153: APPLY_COMMANDS, clock increment/calendar boundary signals, TIME_BOUNDARIES, MANA, CONSTRUCTION, LOGISTICS, FACILITY_COMPLETION, VITALS_AND_ENVIRONMENT, INCIDENTS_AND_EVENTS, FACILITY_QUEUES, AI_DECISIONS, PUBLISH_SNAPSHOT. Handler IDs sorted lexically within phase at line242.",
"domains": [
{
"domain": "閉店",
"current_functions": [
"simulation_runtime._advance_facilities",
"simulation_runtime._advance_guest_queues",
"simulation_runtime._release_closed_business_queues",
"simulation_runtime._release_closed_business_request"
],
"order": "Facility completion precedes queue closure release; release occurs before patience spending. Started-service closure semantics remain D05 pending.",
"old_evidence": "Historical phases 001/002: business closure/operations; midnight open-service proof cannot establish closure behavior.",
"missing": "Approved started-service closure rule and exact-version boundary raw proof."
},
{
"domain": "停電",
"current_functions": [
"simulation_runtime._advance_mana",
"mana_power_projection.apply",
"FacilityService._prepare_service_for_tick",
"FacilityService._complete_service"
],
"order": "Commands precede MANA power projection, then facility completion. NO_POWER pauses active service and power recovery resumes it.",
"old_evidence": "Draft reports formal 961 stop/962 recovery, fresh Reader A/B, one consume/notification and unchanged economy at 963; raw not supplied.",
"missing": "Exact-source/config/input/environment raw stop/recovery proofs including same reservations and all ledgers."
},
{
"domain": "破壊",
"current_functions": [
"simulation_runtime._process_tick_commands",
"simulation_runtime._advance_defense",
"FacilityService._prepare_service_for_tick",
"FacilityService._fail_service"
],
"order": "Command destruction precedes facility processing; INCIDENTS_AND_EVENTS destruction follows completion. BROKEN fails during service preparation.",
"old_evidence": "Draft reports early failure44/charge0/release once, late destruction after completion45 and next-minute failure for incomplete service.",
"missing": "Verified raw early/late destruction and failed diagnostic history; current infrastructure/path applicability."
},
{
"domain": "退出",
"current_functions": [
"simulation_runtime._execute_leave_facility_queue",
"simulation_runtime._leave_guest_queue_boundary",
"simulation_runtime._advance_guest_queues",
"simulation_runtime._advance_guest_ai_decisions"
],
"order": "Public leave command precedes completion; patience release occurs in queues; AI replanning/planned exit follows. LEAVING despawns only after state-entered minute.",
"old_evidence": "Draft reports public reservation release, automatic45-minute patience and completion-before-exit boundaries.",
"missing": "Exact-version leave/patience and overdue-LEAVING reload proofs, no orphan reservations and replay generation checks."
},
{
"domain": "課金",
"current_functions": [
"FacilityService._complete_service",
"simulation_runtime._complete_service_transaction",
"simulation_runtime._apply_service_transaction",
"EconomyService.post"
],
"order": "Completion callback consumes reservations then posts service.payment.<service_id>; notification scope ends after transaction effects. Static code alone does not prove all boundary rollback paths.",
"old_evidence": "P04-02 and historical full are references only; test counts do not establish P04-01 original acceptance.",
"missing": "Raw ledger/inventory/notification proof for stopped, failed, replay and paid completion paths; closure/shift rule dependent proof."
},
{
"domain": "シフト交代",
"current_functions": [
"simulation_runtime._advance_facilities",
"simulation_runtime._advance_staff_ai",
"StaffService.advance_one_minute",
"simulation_runtime._sync_facility_staffing"
],
"order": "Facility completion precedes staff AI, commute and staffing projection. Final18:00 interval design meaning is D05 pending.",
"old_evidence": "Historical phase083 hardening includes shift-end interruption; draft retains diagnostic1080 predicate failure without claiming original violation.",
"missing": "Approved final-interval rule then exact-version1080 boundary including nonzero cost where required."
},
{
"domain": "00:00決算",
"current_functions": [
"simulation_runtime._advance_facility_upkeep",
"simulation_runtime._advance_operations_time",
"OperationsCoordinator._process_minute_boundaries",
"OperationsCoordinator._process_daily_close",
"simulation_runtime._complete_service_transaction"
],
"order": "TIME_BOUNDARIES weather/upkeep/operations precedes facility completion; prior day[0,1440) accounting differs from sale at1440. A01 upkeep already approved.",
"old_evidence": "Draft reports real settlement/payroll/upkeep once, service25 once, unchanged ledgers/history1441; zero payroll fixture is not proof of nonzero payroll.",
"missing": "Current raw midnight/retry/reload idempotency proof and applicable nonzero payroll boundary; full original conformity review."
}
],
"old_evidence_applicability": {
"raw_available_for_reuse": false,
"assessment": "Only local summaries/maps/draft read; original artifact paths remain provenance. No approved reuse asserted.",
"source": "14 byte differences, zero missing mapped paths; six immutable current pins match.",
"config_input_environment": "Not established by raw local evidence; each required proof must pin these independently.",
"runtime_git": "git log --all lists10 Runtime revisions. Content scan of path history found no blob matching old2d7e2cea. Exact diff unavailable; current called functions inspected but old equivalence not established.",
"known_difference_impact": "Runtime/PathService may alter infrastructure, movement, staffing, guest selection and recovery boundary reachability; UI/main/preview and performance budget changes prevent blanket whole-full reuse. Two changed tests cannot supply old exact-version evidence. Seven additional Kenney metadata/sample byte differences require applicability classification, not product edits."
},
"blockers": [
"No index.json schema or supported raw-proof format/mandatory proof identifiers/authority binding supplied; implementing a passing verifier would invent evidence protocol. tools/check_p04_order_evidence.py not created.",
"Old exact Runtime source unavailable in local Git path history; root must supply verified local raw old source before exact diff analysis.",
"No verified local raw historical proofs/config/input/environment supplied; draft pass claims are not acceptance evidence.",
"D05 remains pending; original unit must not be frozen or completed."
],
"validation_plan": [
"Runner/root supplies index/raw proof format and verified local historical source/proofs; confirm immutable pins and all14 map differences.",
"Compare exact old/current Runtime and actual callees; classify infrastructure/route boundary effects and Kenney metadata differences.",
"After D05 approval verify only affected closure/18:00 boundaries; retain failed diagnostics and approved A01.",
"Verify applicable stop/recovery, early/late destruction, public/patience/overdue exit, midnight/replay/reload evidence with raw hashes and source/config/input/environment pins; request fresh finite proofs only where reuse fails.",
"Runner executes p04-acceptance and independent all-condition review/integration; native Windows conditions individually pending only if applicable. No engine/all-regression run here."
]
}
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
{
"historical_runtime": {
"path": "/Users/korizatou114/Projects/TheTree-managed-worktrees/p04-01/.runtime/P04-01/build/audit-support/historical-runtime.txt",
"original_path": "/Users/korizatou114/Projects/とりにく工房ゲーム制作部/artifacts/original-completion-2026-10-02/p04-01-power-formal-recovery-native-r04/stage/autoload/simulation_runtime.gd",
"sha256": "2d7e2cea5424585e9aa4302ab66d1fc4dbaefe743ce4328fccc1efa2f19b82e4"
},
"crlf_only_additional_differences": [
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_dungeon/Tiled/sampleMap.tmx",
"production_raw_sha256": "fc545787837e2655c9d2078cc1b167df0d9ea2755f6ec3912c7987e8501339e3",
"managed_raw_sha256": "3849e083e3d4f6a71dbf725d8473e93fa6ef8cdc9d314368eee15c980cf41775",
"normalized_byte_equality": true,
"normalization": "CRLF to LF only; no acceptance equivalence claim"
},
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_dungeon/Tiled/sampleSheet.tsx",
"production_raw_sha256": "02f1b90cfdb37bcccddc83d074954272aaffd297ed4fabce7bb670f2f3f4be71",
"managed_raw_sha256": "a2cca2c5e50b14023ce00f5d4112fb0b8264bfff9407d7a5198656e28d67fa16",
"normalized_byte_equality": true,
"normalization": "CRLF to LF only; no acceptance equivalence claim"
},
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_dungeon/Visit Kenney.url",
"production_raw_sha256": "0dd1a0b295582cd3185547f0c1d92b4d5392c7782b90a428e192944a496052e0",
"managed_raw_sha256": "6787defa3ecb6118622e1903b65802c0200628fae5164b51b4fd467f92f3f284",
"normalized_byte_equality": true,
"normalization": "CRLF to LF only; no acceptance equivalence claim"
},
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_dungeon/Visit Patreon.url",
"production_raw_sha256": "84be5ef26b07905fa7e196e943c9807bf84138c3a71d87f51c6fd57b85c48c34",
"managed_raw_sha256": "2fcba31333935f4aa35e9de2e74e2b7ba1b1a8011540e08016ff6d81e9dd7490",
"normalized_byte_equality": true,
"normalization": "CRLF to LF only; no acceptance equivalence claim"
},
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_town/Tiny Dungeon (base pack).url",
"production_raw_sha256": "6cf442be20ad3364ba87183461744da9e979b5d4f243c83e2404f2cf884500d9",
"managed_raw_sha256": "6d93bb958f9b7d5f21ceb8cbd24c184dc5c9f87aee7c680b336ecba7a89823d8",
"normalized_byte_equality": true,
"normalization": "CRLF to LF only; no acceptance equivalence claim"
},
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_town/Visit Kenney.url",
"production_raw_sha256": "0dd1a0b295582cd3185547f0c1d92b4d5392c7782b90a428e192944a496052e0",
"managed_raw_sha256": "6787defa3ecb6118622e1903b65802c0200628fae5164b51b4fd467f92f3f284",
"normalized_byte_equality": true,
"normalization": "CRLF to LF only; no acceptance equivalence claim"
},
{
"path": "assets/kenney/tiny_town/Visit Patreon.url",
"production_raw_sha256": "84be5ef26b07905fa7e196e943c9807bf84138c3a71d87f51c6fd57b85c48c34",
"managed_raw_sha256": "2fcba31333935f4aa35e9de2e74e2b7ba1b1a8011540e08016ff6d81e9dd7490",
"normalized_byte_equality": true,
"normalization": "CRLF to LF only; no acceptance equivalence claim"
}
],
"production_changed_paths": 7,
"managed_changed_paths": 14,
"D05_approved": false,
"formal_acceptance": false,
"technical_gate_schema": "Worker may design an internal index format and document it; this is engineering within the requested evidence checker, not approval of unknown game rules. Incomplete required evidence or mandatory rule must fail.",
"first_dispatch_job": "d48e47c6b6e64a8298d2b80894750116",
"first_dispatch_terminal": "failed: worker_blocked",
"gate_not_created_in_first_run": true,
"request_repair_commander_job": "fe389193edd74cfa8ef49709274c0d31",
"repair_job": "b28eb5f573cd44b08c7d5f3cdda51582",
"recorded_repair_count": 1,
"max_repairs": 2,
"repair_run_commander_job": "361b38c222474eaa95decd4ca6ed2a2e",
"repair_dispatch_job": "c1adc9490e8e4e86b84ff631527e7a56",
"commander_repair_decision": {
"action": "request-repair",
"task_id": "P04-01",
"reason": "初回Codex blockedの原因は、検証器tools/check_p04_order_evidence.pyが未作成だったこと(missing gate schemaで仕様補完を避けて停止)。これは内部証拠formatの実装判断で、原ゲーム仕様の不足ではない。既存specの検証器作成指示が、元要件を守るfailclosed形式の設計を許可している。repairs=0で、第1repairは残2/2以内。入力は再起動に十分: input.json等のlocal copy、current source pins、14差分(production7とmanaged14を区別、追加7はroot対managedでCRLF→LFのみbyte検証済み、rawSHA差は隠さない)、正確な旧Runtime(SHA 2d7e2cea完全一致)をbuild_dir/audit-support/historical-runtime.txtへraw保存済み。support.jsonとこのtxtを読取専用の追加試験入力として使う(Git変更scopeなし)。repair範囲: (1) 既存のorder-audit.jsonとORDER_AUDIT.mdは保持し、重複作成しない。必要なら最小の追記・訂正のみ。(2) --verify-onlyのcheckerを作成する。BUILD_OUTPUT_DIR/p04-evidence/index.jsonを必須とし、7領域、不変のsource pin、raw proof hash、適用性を検証する。欠損、D05 pending、stale source、未実行proof、自己申告pass、test count単独のpassは非0で終了する。raw証拠が全て不足していてもcheckerは作成する。生証拠を作ったことにはしない。D05は未承認のまま、その不足がある受入をpassにしない。(3) 全回帰・engine実行、ゲームsource変更、Clock・値の変更は0。原7領域/元30/88/部分点なしの受入分母は維持し、仕様変更・分母変更・予算拡大・main統合は含めない。allowed_pathsは検証器と実行ディレクトリ配下に限る。"
},
"commander_run_decision": {
"action": "run",
"task_id": "P04-01",
"reason": "P04-01はrepair_ready(repairs 1、上限2未満)で、request-repairは実dispatch済みです。既存監査は保持済みで、ROOT_REPAIR_INPUT.mdとread-only追加入力(build_dir/audit-support/support.json、historical-runtime.txt)も供給済みです。そのため前判断の範囲で再runできます。範囲は、workerがtools/check_p04_order_evidence.pyと許可docs内で技術indexformatを設計し、gate作成だけを完結することです。D05 pendingや証拠不足は非0終了とします。全回帰とゲームsource変更は行わず、original 7/30/88の分母は維持します。仕様変更、予算拡大、承認、main統合は含みません。"
},
"formal_independent_review": false
}
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
{
"action": "wait",
"task_id": "P04-01",
"reason": "waitが妥当。新しいrepairは出さない。\n1) 失敗の性質: 正式validateの失敗は、証拠index欠損とD05 pendingによる設計どおりのfail-closedである。checkerは最後に必ず非0で終わる初期preflightで、元成果を完了させる検証器ではない。root検査12caseは欠損/重複JSON/nonfinite/symlink/traversal/stale hash/pointer型/bool schema/stale commitをすべて拒否し、original acceptedはfalseだった。ここから見つかる技術的なfail-open欠陥は、提供されたsource全文とroot結果の範囲ではない。ただし、この診断は読取専用の別セッションによるもので、正式な独立acceptance reviewではない。\n2) 区別すべき欠落: 次の3点は欠陥ではなく、未承認の原規約と未収集の生証跡に起因する欠落である。(a) D05の原規約が未承認。(b) 自己申告receiptとraw native source/log/receiptの意味的結合、および別PID保存memberの一致が未対応。(c) 必須scenario coverageと期待値の承認根拠が未対応。これらは第3repairで解消できない。解消すると、仕様変更・原条件緩和・受入基準の実質変更に当たる。\n3) 現在gateの採用可否: 原受入gateとしては不採用。正式独立acceptance reviewを通ったとは扱わない。a19737b(ソース/成果単位)のmain採用もしない。有効なのは、常時失敗する読取専用preflightと、欠落を可視化した監査記録としての位置づけだけである。\n4) 旧境界の証拠: Runtime旧→現diff(3519 bytes)は、施設/客の候補path query batch、pathcost、connector reuseに限られ、phase登録は変更されていない。ただし、移動・勤務・客の再計画には影響し得る。このため、旧境界のraw proofは一括承認せず、適用可否を個別に判断する。\n5) 次の判断(オーナー判断が必要): repair上限は2/2使用済みで、再登録、上限変更、原条件緩和は禁止されている。したがって、D05具体承認候補の作成が必要かを、有限の選択としてオーナーに提示する。必要性は高い。D05が承認されない限り、どの証拠でもgateは解除できないためである。候補の範囲は、EV/搬送停止、費用時点、日跨ぎ順序、閉店/停電/退出/課金/シフト交代の同一Tick順序に限り、A01承認済みの維持費時点は再確認しない。承認、仕様変更、受入分母の変更はオーナーのみが決める。Commanderは承認可否を決めない。\n6) 以上より、オーナーの明示判断(D05方針、または別契約での検証器拡張と生証跡の供給)が出るまでwaitとする。"
}
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
{
"task_id": "P04-01",
"commit": "a19737b1606ba360a18c8fe0914594f038034924",
"kind": "validation",
"checks": [
{
"id": "p04-acceptance",
"exit_code": 1,
"artifact": "/Users/korizatou114/Library/Application Support/agent-control/the-tree-p04-01/runs/60378a7c53904a54846b0752a7914209",
"passed": false
}
],
"passed": false
}
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
{
"scope": "Synthetic negative tests of submitted checker; not native execution, original-unit acceptance or independent review",
"candidate_commit": "a19737b1606ba360a18c8fe0914594f038034924",
"checker_sha256": "a80a0145064d25a7b8c8e7708cd3a280a1a3c87f335b42236ac020db2ce219a7",
"cases": [
{
"case": "no-index",
"rejected": true
},
{
"case": "duplicate-json-keys",
"rejected": true
},
{
"case": "nonfinite-json",
"rejected": true
},
{
"case": "symlink",
"rejected": true
},
{
"case": "traversal",
"rejected": true
},
{
"case": "absolute-path",
"rejected": true
},
{
"case": "stale-hash",
"rejected": true
},
{
"case": "invalid-pointer-escape",
"rejected": true
},
{
"case": "leading-zero-array-index",
"rejected": true
},
{
"case": "bool-is-not-int",
"rejected": true
},
{
"case": "bool-schema-version",
"rejected": true
},
{
"case": "stale-candidate",
"rejected": true
}
],
"negative_cases": 12,
"unexpected_accepts": 0,
"original_unit_accepted": false
}
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
{
"original_id": "P04-01",
"candidate_commit": "a19737b1606ba360a18c8fe0914594f038034924",
"submitted": true,
"formal_validation_job": "4be66cbedd2b4b6287c82a4215244053",
"formal_validation_passed": false,
"validation_gap": "mandatory evidence index absent; no native/current7boundary proof collected",
"negative_rejection_cases": 12,
"unexpected_accepts": 0,
"initial_preflight_only": true,
"semantic_native_provenance_binding_implemented": false,
"mandatory_scenario_coverage_implemented": false,
"D05_approved": false,
"current_task_state": "repair_pending",
"repairs_used": 2,
"max_repairs": 2,
"third_repair_authorized": false,
"main_adopted": false,
"formal_independent_acceptance_review": false,
"diagnostic_only_independent_Claude_session": "94101c515aa7418dba422a1f71acd6ed",
"original_unit_complete": false,
"root_disposition": [
"Do not adopt always-reject initial preflight as completed acceptance verifier.",
"Semantic provenance and coverage are unfinished original-required verification, not waived conditions. Adding those checks does not by itself relax original conditions, contrary to that broad implication in commander diagnosis.",
"No third repair/new project to bypass cap. D05 candidates can be prepared as unapproved planning documents, without adopting game rules or changing task state.",
"Formal independent acceptance review remains required after actual complete applicable evidence and validation."
]
}

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More